
Citation: | Boyan Lin, Wenjie Shi, Qiongxuan Lu, Takumi T. Shito, Haiyan Yu, Bo Dong. 2023: Establishment of a developmental atlas and transgenetic tools in the ascidian Styela clava. Marine Life Science & Technology, 5(4): 435-454. DOI: 10.1007/s42995-023-00200-2 |
Ascidians such as Halocynthia roretzi, Ciona intestinalis, and Phallusia mammillata have long been used as model organisms for studying embryonic development and its underlying regulatory mechanisms (McDougall et al. 2011; Satoh 1994, 2013). Due to the transparent nature of the embryo and its relatively small cell number, Conklin (1905a) used the fertilized oocytes of S. clava to track the regularity of cell division based on observations of the specific distribution and allocation of cytoplasmic pigmentum during embryogenesis, and established a cell lineage for embryonic development. Later studies found special mosaic developmental patterns in solitary ascidians such as Halocynthia roretzi and Ciona robusta (Ciona intestinalis type A) (Nishida 2005). In addition, the manipulation of embryos such as the construction of ascidian libraries and transgenes (Corbo et al. 1997), genome assembly at the chromosomal level and transcriptome profiling during development (Dehal et al. 2002; Satou et al. 2019; Wei et al. 2020), gene editing (Christiaen et al. 2009; Sasaki et al. 2014; Small et al. 2007; Stolfi et al. 2014) and other technology platforms, improved the capacity for embryo manipulation at the genetic level. Considering the special evolutionary status (Delsuc et al. 2006) and the comprehensive database (Brozovic et al. 2016; Tassy et al. 2010) of ascadians, research using these organisms can provide insights into the origin of chordate organs, and how vertebrates evolved from the common ancestor of chordates.
Styela clava is classified as a member of the class Ascidiacea, order Stolidobranchia, and family Styelidae. It was originally described by Herdman (1881) from dredged specimens in the Sea of Okhotsk (Abbott and Johnson 1972). Styela clava is a tunicate that shows global environmental adaptation (Dupont et al. 2009; Goldstien et al. 2010; Locke et al. 2007) because of its invasiveness, which may negatively affect native species and cause serious damage to commercial aquaculture such as scallop farming (Davis and Davis 2010). Adults can be collected all year round because of the high tolerance of S. clava to a wide range of temperatures (Cinar 2016).
Styela clava adults have multiple gonads, compared to a single gonad in C. robusta species. There is no outer covering of follicle cells on the eggs of S. clava whereas such a covering is present on the eggs of Ciona spp. (Bhattachan et al. 2020). The eggs of S. clava are up to 200 microns in diameter with a tough chorion. The fertilized egg needs around 10 h to develop into a hatched larva which acquires complete swimming ability instantly. After a swimming period of about 2.5 h post hatching (hph), adhesion will occur. In contrast, adhesion occurs after about 4.5 h ' swimming period in C. robusta (Matsunobu and Sasakura 2015). At around 3 hph, S. clava larvae have completed the swimming larval stage and the rapid tail regression process is initiated. Although there are significant structural differences between S. clava embryos and other ascidians (Dardaillon et al. 2020; Guignard et al. 2020; Hotta et al. 2007, 2020), detailed images of developmental stages are still needed to better identify the differences between species.
In this study, we constructed a standard three-dimensional (3D) developmental table and collected confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM) images of embryogenes in S. clava by annotating the morphology at each defined stage sequentially at 23 ℃. We also provided a continuous time-lapse movie with standard developmental stages and time duration. Morphometrical information about the length of the tail-to-trunk ratio is also described for each stage. We deposited the raw data on the Resources of Ascidian Morphology Network-based (RAMNe) at https://chordate.bpni.bio.keio.ac.jp/RAMNe/latest/index_styela.html, thereby providing a comprehensive record of the spatiotemporal morphological changes that occur during the early developmental processes of S. clava. This enables easy access to 3D angles of each embryo and slices of different layers, and facilitates systematic comparisons of the morphology and development process of C. robusta and A. aspersa at the same stage, which is valuable for studying chordate development. In addition, we developed an easy procedure to remove the chorion from fertilized eggs by the chemical-washing method and applied tissue-specific fluorescent labeling in S. clava embryos.
We observed and defined 22 stages of embryogenesis and larval development in S. clava, from egg fertilization to hatching of larvae, based on morphology and developmental events. For each stage, we provide corresponding differential interference contrast (DIC) images of embryos with a chorion (Supplementary Fig. S1), DIC images of embryos without a chorion (Supplementary Fig. S2), and 3D reconstruction images of embryos without a chorion using Phalloidin 488 staining (Fig. 1). Embryogenesis was partitioned into six periods: zygote, cleavage, gastrula, neurula, tailbud, and larva.
The criteria for staging of the zygote to cleavage period (stages 1–10) depend on the embryo shape and the quantity of cells. After stage 10, the criteria are based primarily on embryo morphology, the tail-to-trunk ratio (recorded after stage 15), and distinct developmental event features referencing those previously described for C. robusta (Hotta et al. 2007).
The "standard development time" (in hours) was established to represent the normalized hours post-fertilization (hpf) at 23 ℃ by converted staging information. The optimal incubation temperatures were between 16 and 23 ℃, based on our observations and previously published research (Cinar 2016). The hatching times, which were determined by time-lapse imaging of chorionic embryos co-cultured with dechorionic embryos at different temperatures, were 10 ± 0.50 h at 23 ℃, 12 ± 0.38 h at 20 ℃, 17 ± 0.48 h at 18 ℃, and 20 ± 0.43 h at 16 ℃ (n = 5, 5, 5, 5 at different temperatures), respectively.
The zygote period (0–0.8 hpf at 23 ℃) consisted of only one stage, stage 1, which lasted from fertilization to the end of the first mitotic cell division (Fig. 2). The initial mitotic division is shown in Fig. 2B, B'(optical section). Although narrowed, the cleavage furrow between the two daughter cells is not yet fully formed. The egg diameter was 180 ± 5 µm (n = 10).
The cleavage period (0.8–3.0 hpf at 23 ℃) consisted of eight stages, i.e., stages 2–9 (Figs. 2C, 3A). The cleavage stage was characterized by a sequence of mitotic divisions that culminated in the formation of numerous blastomeres. The embryos underwent seven divisions during this period and were bilaterally symmetrical. At the 16-cell stage, unequal cell division (UCD) occurred resulting in the formation of two smaller cells (Hibino et al. 1998). The asynchronous vegetative half split more quickly than the animal half following this stage, forming 32-, 44-, and 64-cell stages (McDougall et al. 2019). The developmental stages during this period were defined both by cell quantity and cell morphology. After each division of the blastomere contraction process (Supplementary Movies 1, 2), the morphological changes were particularly obvious before and after the contraction of 16-cell and 32-cell stages. These two stages were further separated into two sub-stages.
Two-cell stage (0.8 hpf, Fig. 2C). The first cleavage plane is determined by the embryo dividing into the left and right halves.
Four-cell stage (1.2 hpf; Fig. 2D). The second cleavage plane is determined by the embryo dividing into anterior and posterior halves. Following cell division, each blastomere was initially arranged loosely with a gap in the center (Fig. 2D). Eventually, the blastomeres compacted and the gap was filled in.
Eight-cell stage (1.4 hpf; Fig. 2E). The embryo underwent a third cell division to separate the vegetal plane of the cell from the animal plane. These two planes were at a slight slanted angle and were not orthogonal. We used the nomenclature established by Conklin (1905b) to label the four founder cell lineages of S. clava as follows: a, animal anterior; b, animal posterior; A, vegetal anterior; B, vegetal posterior. Each blastomere in live embryos might be recognized based on its size (Fig. 2E, B4.2 blastomere is the largest). Eventually, embryo compaction occurred so that it resembled a sphere (Supplementary Movie 1, T = 1 h 17 min).
16-cell stage (1.6 hpf; Fig. 2F–G). All cells in both the vegetal and animal poles underwent a fourth cleavage. The embryo's distinct anterior–posterior polarity was apparent first and the B5.2 blastomere was much smaller than the others. In C. robusta and Phallusia, the occurrence of these phenomena is caused by the effect of the centrosome-attracting body (CAB) (Dumollard et al. 2017; Negishi et al. 2007). However, in S. clava, we were unable to observe this structure clearly using phalloidin staining. This stage was divided into two parts: an early, uncompacted 16-cell stage (stage 5a, Fig. 2F–F') and a late, compacted 16-cell stage (stage 5b, Fig. 2G–G').
32-cell stage (2.0 hpf; Fig. 2H–I). All blastomeres underwent a fifth cell division, which happened earlier in the vegetal than the animal lineages. The B5.2 division was once again asymmetric, resulting in a tiny posterior B6.3 cell. In C. robusta, this was caused by the CAB's effect, which was not observed in S. clava. This stage was divided into two parts: an early, uncompacted 32-cell stage which was almost spherical (stage 6a, Fig. 2H–H') and a late, compacted 32-cell stage which was flatter and had a bulging B6.2 cell (stage 6b, Fig. 2I–I').
44-cell stage (2.3 hpf; Fig. 2J). Only vegetal blastomeres underwent a sixth cell division during this stage. Bulging in vegetal blastomeres was observed.
64-cell stage (2.6 hpf; Fig. 2K). The animal blastomeres completed a sixth cell division. Due to the projection of the A7.8 and B7.4 blastomeres, the embryo appeared more angular than round when viewed from the animal pole.
76-cell stage (2.8 hpf; Fig. 3A). The vegetal half of the embryo had an asymmetrical pattern of cell division. Compared to animal cells, the vegetal blastomeres were taller and more columnar (Fig. 3A''). The vegetal side of the embryo became flattened and did not begin to sink until gastrulation was initiated. This stage was the last one prior to gastrulation.
The gastrula period (3.0–4.0 hpf at 23 ℃) consisted of four stages: stages 10–13 (Fig. 3B–E"). Gastrulation occurred at three stages between the sixth and seventh cleavages of the ascidian embryo. The initial stage is endoderm invagination, followed by mesoderm involution, and ultimately ectoderm epiboly (Swalla 1993).
Initial gastrula (3.0 hpf; Fig. 3B–B''). Gastrulation began with A7.1 blastomere apical constriction. The invagination in the middle of the vegetal pole was obvious in longitudinal sections (Fig. 3B", arrowhead).
Early gastrula stage (3.2 hpf; Fig. 3C–C"). The embryo developed into a cup-shaped structure as the endoderm cells progressively invaginated. When viewed from the vegetal aspect, the embryo was horseshoe-shaped.
Mid-gastrula stage (3.6 hpf; Fig. 3D–D"). The embryo's blastopore was still open in the middle. Six rows of cells—three rows of a-line cells (upper) and three rows of A-line cells (lower)—were arranged in a highly regular pattern on the flat neural plate.
Late gastrula stage (4.0 hpf; Fig. 3E–E"). The blastopore of the embryo was almost closed at the posterior end. The embryo elongated anteriorly. Six or more rows of the neural plate formed, and the first two A-line neural rows (Ⅰ and Ⅱ near the blastopore) began to curve (start of neurulation).
The neurula period (4.0–4.8 hpf at 23 ℃) consisted of three stages: stages 14–16 (Fig. 4A–C"). Neurulation is the transformation of a flat neuroectodermal sheet called the neural plate into a closed and extended neural tube (Nicol and Meinertzhagen 1988a, b). The neural tube then splits from the epidermis, forming the rudiments of the nervous system (Hashimoto et al. 2015).
Early neurula stage (4.0 hpf; Fig. 4A–A"). The a-line neural plate initially bent to form a furrow bordered by raised neural folds. The blastopore was completely closed. Zippering of neural tubes started from the posterior region of the embryo (Fig. 4A).
Mid-neurula stage (4.3 hpf; Fig. 4B–B"). The neural tube remained open. The neural plate of the A-line cells also caused a neural fold and the embryo was oval in shape (Fig. 4B).
Late neurula stage (4.6 hpf; Fig. 4C–C"). The neural tube closure commenced in the posterior area (Fig. 4C, arrowhead). The embryo elongated as the notochord precursors converged and intercalated.
The tailbud period (4.8–10 hpf at 23 ℃) consisted of five stages: stages 17–21 (Figs. 4D–D", 5A–D"'). The tailbud period was separated into four canonical stages: initial tailbud, early tailbud, mid-tailbud, and late tailbud. The late tailbud stage was divided into two sub-stages due to the prolonged development time and the significant morphological changes.
Initial tailbud stage (4.8 hpf; Fig. 4D–D"). Separation between trunk and tail regions was present in embryos. The trunk and tail were equal in length. The neuropore migrated anteriorly, and the neural tube closure in the posterior area was nearly complete. Two rows of notochord cells were arranged in the left–right direction, some of which were still interdigitating and in the process of intercalation.
Early tailbud stage (5.2 hpf; Fig. 5A–A"). The neuropore had closed at the top of the trunk. Separation between tail and trunk regions was more distinct and the tail was significantly longer than the trunk (Tail/Trunk ratio = 1.2). Neurulation, and the intercalation of the few notochord cells that were positioned most anteriorly, were completed.
Mid-tailbud stage (5.9 hpf; Fig. 5B–B"). The length of the tail was 1.8 times that of the trunk (Table 3). The intercalation of notochord cells was completed. Viewed from the lateral aspect, the tail contained three rows of muscles on each side, with each medio-lateral line having seven muscles and each lateral line having four muscles. In general, a total of 36 muscle cells and 40 notochord cells were found in S. clava (see section mode of RAMNe).
Late tailbud stage Ⅰ (7.0 hpf; Fig. 5C–C"). Pigmentation of the otoliths could be observed under an anatomical microscope (Supplementary Fig. S2). The length of the tail was 2.3 times longer that of the trunk.
Late tailbud stage Ⅱ (8.0 hpf; Fig. 5D–D"). The length of the tail was four times that of the trunk. The epidermal cells in front of the trunk developed in a columnar fashion but did not protrude to form into palps. The notochord and muscle cells elongated along the A-P axis. Immediately prior to hatching, tail twitching was occasionally observed.
Hatching larva (10.0 hpf at 23 ℃, Fig. 6). The trunk grew longer and became more rectangular. The otoliths and ocellus could be observed under an anatomical microscope (Supplementary Fig. S3). Only one siphon primordium (either atrial or oral siphon primordium) was observed in the posterior region of the trunk.
We observed sereval unique organogenesis events during early development of S. clava, including the processes of notochord formation, the disappearance of palps, and tail regression.
In ascidians, notochord tissue is the most significant tissue localized at the midline region of the tail. It provides mechanochemical signals and serves as a hydrostatic skeleton during embryogenesis and the hatching larva stage. The notochord organogenesis process can be separated into three main phases in C. robusta embryogenesis (Lu et al. 2019): cell intercalation, which leads to the notochord forming a single row of cells; cell elongation, which lengthens the notochord along the A-P axis; and tubulogenesis, which provides more flexibility and rigidity to notochord tissue (Mizotani et al. 2018; Peng et al. 2020; Zhao et al. 2021). Ascidiella aspersa also seems to go through all three stages based on the available data (Funakoshi et al. 2021). In contrast, we observed only the first two phases during embryogenesis in S. clava. The intercalation of notochord cells was completed during the initial tailbud to early tailbud stage. After the mid-tailbud stage, coin-like notochord cells were elongated along the A–P axis to form drum-shaped cells (Fig. 7A). However, no lumen structure was detected in the notochord after cell elongation, even at the stage of tail regression initiation (Fig. 7A, hatching larva). These findings are not consistent with a previous study which reported luminization in S. clava (Jiang and Smith 2007). We also found that the embryos and larvae of S. clava did not form palps. In C. robusta and A. aspersa (Funakoshi et al. 2021), the anterior-most ectoderm cells thicken and protrude into three palps at the front of the nerve plate. The palps are involved in larval attachment and metamorphosis, and function in both chemo- and mechano-sensation (Wagner et al. 2014; Wakai et al. 2021). From the late tailbud stage to the hatching larva stage, we performed a 3D reconstruction of the trunk and confirmed that no protruding structures are present on the top of the trunk in S. clava embryos and larvae (Fig. 7B, yellow arrowhead). However, a thickening of the anterior ectoderm cells was detected from the late tailbud Ⅱ stage (Fig. 5D', arrowhead).
Another obviously distinct developmental characteristic of S. clava larvae is tail regression. The tail regression process appears to differ greatly among ascidians (Cloney 1982). The time duration of tail regression and how the tail tissue is arranged in the trunk are the two key differences. Styela clava larval tail regression started at 3 hph and took only about 15 min to complete at 23 ℃ (from tail regression initiation to tail completely regressed into the trunk), while C. robusta larval tail regression starts at 12 hph and takes more than one hour to complete at 18 ℃ (Matsunobu and Sasakura 2015). Furthermore, the arrangement of the regressed-tail tissue in the trunk differs significantly between S. clava and C. robusta. The notochord cells of S. clava were concentrated in the posterior part of the trunk part and were completely seperated from other regressed-tail tissues; muscle cells rapidly buckled into a spherical shape and were scattered along the edge of the posterior part of the trunk; the trunk tissue was compressed into the anterior part of the trunk (Fig. 7C, left). In contrast, the internal tissues of C. robusta's tail were stacked in a coiled form, called coiled internal tissues (IT) (Yamaji et al. 2020), and the muscle and notochord tissues were spirally arranged in the posterior part of the trunk with no obvious cell buckling or tissue reconstruction (Fig. 7C, right).
The present study also revealed notable differences among S. clava, C. robusta, and A. aspersa. We found only one siphon primordium (either atrial or oral) at the posterior end of the trunk in S. clava larvae (Fig. 6A, A"), whereas there are two atrial siphon primordia in C. intestinalis and A. aspersa larvae (Funakoshi et al. 2021; Hotta et al. 2007). We also compared the ratio of the tail-to-trunk length among the three species and found that C. robusta had the highest, followed by S. clava, and A. aspersa (Table 4). Among these three ascidians, a decrease in the ratio of tail-to-trunk length was observed only in S. clava. This occurred at the hatching larva stage and was caused by an increase in trunk length. Moreover, we also compared the number of lateral epidermal cells in the tail of the three species and found that C. robusta had the highest number, i.e., ~ 60 cells (Hotta et al. 2007), A. aspersa had the lowest, i.e., ~ 40 cells (Funakoshi et al. 2021), while S. clava has a middle number, i.e., ~ 50 cells. Furthermore, from stage 18 to stage 20, there was no significant ventral bending of the tail in dechorionated S. clava embryos (Fig. 5A–C), whereas such bending is present in both C. robusta and A. aspersa embryos (Funakoshi et al. 2021; Hotta et al. 2007; Kogure et al. 2022; Lu et al. 2020). It is noteworthy, however, that dechorionation might have had an effect on the developmental potential of embryos at the tailbud stages.
We integrated the raw data of S. clava into a web-based database, "RAMNe." The images were exported as a series of files to enable easy viewing of cross-sectional and 3D images using a web browser (Fig. 8, https://chordate.bpni.bio.keio.ac.jp/RAMNe/latest/index_styela.html). At the web interface of the developmental table, images were linked to information on developmental stages, developmental nomenclature, hour post-fertilization (hpf), % hatch, cell lineage, and time-lapse movies. Additionally, 3D reconstruction images, cross-sectional images, and DIC images of the embryos are also displayed (Fig. 8A). Users can interactively view 3D images (Fig. 8B) and z-section images (Fig. 8C) online by selecting any developmental stage from the table. Furthermore, the database also displays corresponding images from C. robusta and A. aspersa (Funakoshi et al. 2021; Hotta et al. 2007, 2020), which can easily be compared with S. clava (Fig. 8D). The detailed usage of the RAMNe database has been described previously (Funakoshi et al. 2021).
The eggs of S. clava are difficult to dechorionate due to their thick and dense chorions. These structures primarily comprise covered cylindrical box-like follicular cells on the outside and test cells dispersed irregularly on the inside, similar to Styela plicata eggs (Villa and Patricolo 2000). To establish the ideal dechorionation method, we first tested enzymes (chitosan, chitinase, and NaClO) and other components of the dechorionation solution used in C. robusta, such as altering the amounts of NaOH and sodium thioglycolate (see Table 1). Our results showed that the dechorionation solution with chitosan or chitinase cannot remove the chorion within 30 min; using NaClO caused destruction of the oocyte; and increasing the concentration of NaOH and sodium thioglycolate did not significantly reduce dechorionation duration, but the embryos were more susceptible to malformation. The optimum dechorionation solution for S. clava was found to be 1% sodium thioglycolate, 0.05% proteinase E, 55 µL 10 N NaOH, and 10 mL filtered seawater (FSW). Compared with the dechorionation method for C. robusta embryos, extra NaOH (55 μL) needed to be added to the dechorionation solution, while the concentration of protease E and sodium thioglycolate remained unchanged. Furthermore, a longer dechorionation time duration (18 min) was necessary to totally remove the chorion for S. clava embryos. Based on the above experimental results, we developed a standard protocol for S. clava embryo dechorionation. The feritilized eggs were immersed in the dechorionation solution (Fig. 9A, step 1) and, by gently pepetting for around 18 min, the chorion can be removed (Fig. 9A, step 2). Dechorionated eggs were then washed five times with FSW and transfered into an agarose-coated dish. To avoid harm and aberrant development due to the dechorionation solution, the dechorionation process must be completed within 18 min. The dechorionated eggs could either be used for the subsequent electroporation process or incubated for morphological observation.
Different Enzyme | Chitosana | NaClOb | Proteinase Ec | ||||||
Dechorionation solution components | Chitosan | 2 mL | NaClO | 0.05 mL or 0.1 mL | Proteinase E | 0.05% | |||
Acetic acid | 0.2 mL | FSW | Up to 10 mL | Sodium thioglycolate | 1% | 1% | 1.5% | 1% | |
FSW | 10 mL | 10N NaOH (µL) | 48 | 55 | 55 | 60 | |||
FSW | Up to 10 mL | ||||||||
Dechorionation duration (min) | > 30 min | < 6 min | 20 | 18 | 19.5 | 17.5 | |||
Dechorionation efficiency | Chorions unremovable | Oocytes destructed | × | √ | × | × | |||
Using chitosana for over 30 min failed to remove the chorions. Using NaClOb, the oocytes were destroyed before the chorions. Using different concentrations of NaOH and sodium thioglycolatec, the dechorionation time did not alter significantly and abnormalities of embryos were more likely to arise |
Subsequently, we explored the optimum transgene technology in S. clava by electroporation. By using the Gene Pulser Xcell System (BIO-RAD, Hercules, USA), we optimized the electroporation-related parameters, including electroporation voltage, capacitance, and plasmid concentration. The initial voltage value was calculated from the size of the egg, and the specific formula was as follows (Zeller 2018):
Ec=Vc0.75×dcell , |
where Ec is the critical field strength in volts per centimeter, Vc is the membrane permeation voltage (1 at 20 ℃) and dcell is the cell diameter in centimeters (Multiporator manual, www.eppendorf.com). The diameter of S. clava eggs was 180 ± 5 µm (n = 10) and, together with our experimental quantification on the survival rate after electroporation, the optimal voltage value was 45 V (see Table 2). After determining the voltage, we searched for the ideal value of capacitance. A previous study showed that higher capacitance values improved transfection but reduced viability (Zeller 2018). Capacitances ranging from 1500 to 3000 µF were investigated and it was found that 2000 and 2500 µF was suitable for electroporation. We also found that a higher concentration of plasmid DNA was necessary for high transgene efficiency. Thus, we established a standard protocal for S. clava embryo electroporation, which resulted in an electroporation efficiency of 37.2 ± 9.7%. In brief, dechorionated fertilized eggs (300 μL) were mixed with 80 μg plasmid DNA in a prefabricated electrotransfer solution (0.77 mol/L mannitol in ddH2O). Then, the mixture was transfered into 4 mm cuvettes with a Gene Pulser Xcell System (BIO-RAD) and electroporated with expontential decay pulse. Electroporated eggs were recovered for around 10 min, washed once, transferred into an agarose-coated dish (Fig. 9B) and incubated at 18 ℃.
Voltage | Different voltage | Different capacitance | ||||||
60 V | 50 V | 45 V | 40 V | 45 V | 45 V | 45 V | ||
Capacitance | 2500/2000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 3000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 1500 µF | |
Transfection efficiency | × a | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | × | |
Normal development | × | × | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Using higher voltage values improved transfection efficiency but damaged the egg in identical capacitance conditions. We were unable to determine plasmid transfection at 60 V (a) since the eggs were entirely broken and undeveloped. Under the same voltage condition, similarly, higher capacitance values improved transfection but reduced viability |
We next attempted to introduce exogenous plasmids into fertilized eggs of S. clava. We designed a tissue-specific fluorescent fusion construct to specifically label the tissue cells. The upstream 3 kb of the C. robusta homologous genes MA1 and Epi1 (Chiba et al. 1998) were used as the driver to force a GFP or tdTomato fluorescent reporter to be expressed in specific tissue cells (Fig. 9C). After electroporation of these constructs, the results showed that the Sc-Ma1 > eGFP plasmid was expressed in tail muscle cells (Fig. 9D), whereas the Sc-Epi1 > tdTomato plasmid was expressed in the epidermal cells (Fig. 9E). Due to the mosaic expression in ascidians, the constructs were only expressed in part of the target tissue cells. The fluorescently labeled embryos could develp into larval stages in our experiments, by which the subcellular location of proteins could be visualized in a living embryo to track the dynamics of this protein.
In this study, we developed a chemical method that can easily remove the chorionic membrane from the eggs of S. clava, allowing us to observe the early embryogenesis easily and offer the possibility to genetically manuplate the eggs. Based on this technique, we established a developmental atlas of S. clava and defined the developmental stages for this species for the first time. Combining CLSM, DIC, and time-lapse imaging, the internal and exterior structures of the embryo at each stage and time of development were meticulously documented. We accurately depicted the anatomy and developmental stages of S. clava and established a standard developmental table, which enables detailed comparison of tissue morphology and differentiation between wild-type embryos and knockout mutant embryos. The processes of embryogenesis and quantitative data of S. clava are summarized in Table 3, including the developmental duration, basic embryonic morphological characteristics, time ratio to hatch, and tail-to-trunk length ratios. We also compared the tail-to-trunk length ratios and tail length with C. robusta and A. aspersa (Table 4). Additionally, based on the mature electroporation technique in C. robusta, we applied the electroporation technique in S. clava for the first time. DNA constructs were successfully introduced into S. clava fertilized eggs. These new techniques, and the developmental atlas of S. clava embryos and larvae, provide a crucial basis for S. clava to be used as a marine model organism for reserach on developmental biology, evo-devo, ecology, and cell biology.
Stage | Characteristics | Measurement of embryos | |||
Time after fertilization | % Hatch | Tail/trunk ratio | |||
Ⅰ. Zygote period (0–0.8 h) | |||||
St. 1 | One cell | Zygote, the fertilized egg | 0 | 0% | |
Ⅱ. Cleavage period (0.8–3 h) | |||||
St. 2 | Two-cell | The embryo is composed of two cells | 50 min | 9% | |
St. 3 | Four-cell | The embryo is composed of four cells | 1 h 10 min | 12% | |
St. 4 | Eight-cell | The embryo is composed of eight cells | 1 h 24 min | 14% | |
St. 5a | Early 16-cell | The embryo is composed of 16 cells, Blastomeres are uncompacted | 1 h 40 min | 17% | |
St. 5b | Late 16-cell | The embryo is composed of 16 cells, Blastomeres have been compacted | 1 h 55 min | 20% | |
St. 6a | Early 32-cell | The embryo is composed of 32 cells, Blastomeres are uncompacted | 2 h 03 min | 21% | |
St. 6b | Late 32-cell | The embryo is composed of 32 cells, Blastomeres have been compacted | 2 h 12 min | 23% | |
St. 7 | 44-cell | The embryo is composed of 44 cells. Bulging in vegetal blastomeres | 2 h 21 min | 24% | |
St. 8 | 64-cell | The embryo is composed of 64 cells | 2 h 36 min | 27% | |
St. 9 | 76-cell | The embryo is composed of 76 cells. Planarization on its vegetal side in preparation for gastrulation | 2 h 47 min | 29% | |
Ⅲ. Gastrula period (3–4 h) | |||||
St. 10 | Initial gastrula | Gastrulation starts with the apical constriction of A7.1 blastomeres, which is the center of invagination | 2 h 57 min | 30% | |
St. 11 | Early gastrula | The vegetal side of the embryo has a horseshoe shape | 3 h 09 min | 32% | |
St. 12 | Mid-gastrula | The blastopore is located posteriorly and is still open. The embryo starts to lengthen along the a-p axis and is no longer spherical | 3 h 40 min | 38% | |
St. 13 | Late gastrula | The blastopore is located posteriorly and is nearly closed | 3 h 57 min | 41% | |
Ⅳ. Neurula period (4–4.8 h) | |||||
St. 14 | Early neurula | Neural plate forms a furrow. The blastopore is completely closed | 4 h 04 min | 42% | |
St. 15 | Mid-neurula | The embryo has an oval shape. A-line cells create a neural fold | 4 h 20 min | 45% | |
St. 16 | Late neurula | The neural tube closure starts in the posterior part | 4 h 37 min | 48% | 0.9 |
Ⅴ. Tailbud period (4.8–10 h) | |||||
St. 17 | Initial tailbud | First indication of a separation between trunk and tail parts in this stage | 4 h 47 min | 49% | 1.0 |
St. 18 | Early tailbud | A few anterior notochord cells finish intercalation and the neuropore has just closed | 5 h 10 min | 53% | 1.4 |
St. 19 | Mid-tailbud | Intercalation of the notochord cells is completed. Tail twice as long as trunk | 5 h 52 min | 60% | 1.9 |
St. 20 | Late tailbud Ⅰ | The pigmentation of the otolith starts | 7 h 07 min | 73% | 2.3 |
St. 21 | Late tailbud Ⅱ | On the verge of hatching. Tail four times as long as trunk | 9 h 06 min | 88% | 4.3 |
Ⅵ. Larva period (10 h) | |||||
St. 22 | Hatching larva | Hatching. Swimming instantly. The trunk has an elongated rectangular shape | 9 h 43 min | 100% | 3.5 |
A total of 22 stages were divided into six periods. Columns from left to right: "Characteristics" were primarily based on observations of specimens under a dissecting microscope. "Measurement of embryos": Time after fertilization (23 ℃, n = 5), % hatch = rate of T (min)/583 (min), and ratio of tail/trunk length |
Stage | Styela clava | Ciona robusta | Ascidiella aspersa | |||||||
Tail/trunkratio | Trunk length (µm) | Tail Length (µm) | Corresponding stage | Tail/trunk ratio | Trunk length (µm) | Tail Length (µm) | Tail/trunk ratio | |||
St. 16 | Late neurula | 0.9 | 100.3 ± 3.1 | 98.1 ± 10.4 | St. 16 | 1.0 | 85.3 | 84.2 | ||
St. 17 | Initial tailbud | 1.0 | 98.0 ± 1.8 | 105.6 ± 6.5 | St. 17 | 1.0 | 89.9 | 87.8 | 0.9 | |
St. 18 | Early tailbud | 1.4 | 97.0 ± 1.2 | 132.5 ± 3.4 | St. 19 | 1.2 | 103.0 | 120.3 | 1.0 | |
St. 19 | Mid-tailbud | 1.9 | 113.6 ± 0.9 | 216.7 ± 15.7 | St. 21 | 1.6 | 114.3 | 180.7 | 1.5 | |
St. 20 | Late tailbud Ⅰ | 2.3 | 118.6 ± 1.1 | 279.9 ± 18.9 | St. 23 | 2.1 | 118.9 | 255.1 | 2.0 | |
St. 21 | Late tailbud Ⅱ | 4.3 | 127.0 ± 0.8 | 548.8 ± 7.3 | St. 25 | 3.9 | 143.7 | 558.6 | 2.8 | |
St. 22 | Hatching larva | 3.5 | 178.3 ± 3.0 | 641.7 ± 14.2 | St. 26 | 4.2 | 159.3 | 661.6 | 3.0 | |
Tail-to-trunk ratios and lengths of trunk and tail (each stage, n = 3) from seven stages of late neurula to hatching larva (stages 16–22) in S. clava. "Corresponding stage" corresponds to C. robusta at the same stage as S. clava. The data of C. robusta and A. aspersa are from the literature (Funakoshi et al. 2021; Hotta et al. 2007) |
Styela clava is a potential model organism for studying morphological changes such as tail retraction during metamorphosis. Additionally, notochord development in S. clava embryos was straightforward during the tailbud period and did not involve vacuolation to generate the lumen, making it an ideal model for research on intercellular insertion and polarity establishment. However, it is noteworthy that dechorionation has been found to have a slight impact on morphogenesis (Oonuma et al. 2016; Kourakis et al. 2021). Nevertheless, based on the present findings, we expect chorionated specimens of S. clava to be used in future research on developmental processes.
It has been reported that the leathery sea squirt ascidian S. clava is an invasive species that shows high capacity for environmental adaptation and tolerance to temperature and salinity (Dupont et al. 2009; Goldstien et al. 2010; Locke et al. 2007). The results of studies on transcription factors and chromosome-level gene expression in S. clava have revealed a significant increase in the number of transposons and heat shock protein-related genes (Wei et al. 2020). These findings shed light on the organism's environmental adaptation mechanisms based on its genome and molecular networks. However, experimental validation and detailed molecular mechanisms are impossible without transgenic manuplation. Based on the dechornation and electroporation tenniques reported here, transgenic technologies, such as gene knockout and overexpression, could easily be applied in S. clava. This would significantly improve the operability of embryonic genes, shedding a powerful new light on the molecular mechanisms of the development of invasive ascidians and chordates.
Adults of S. clava (Herdman, 1881) were collected from Weihai City, China, and acclimated into seawater at 18 ℃ under constant light to accumulate gametes in the laboratory. The 18S rRNA gene was amplified and the PCR products were sequenced for species identification (Wei et al. 2020). The adult animals were dissected, and the mature eggs and sperm were isolated from the gonoducts from different individuals. A drop of 1 mol/L Tris pH 9.5 (Kobayashi and Satou 2018) was added to activate the sperm which was then mixed with eggs at room temperature for 15–20 min. Fertilized eggs were washed with seawater through a nylon filter to remove sperm and debris and incubated in FSW at 16 ~ 23 ℃.
The chorion provides protection to eggs, promotes fertilization, and prevents self-fertilization and polyspermism (Villa and Patricolo 2000). Additionally, we found that eggs without the chorion cannot be fertilized. Therefore, unless needed for specific experimental purposes, we typically removed the chorion after fertilization. Fertilized eggs were washed with FSW to remove impurities and sperm, and were then transferred to a 60 mm 0.1% agarose-coated dish with dechorionation solution. The chorions can be adequately digested by the enzyme after 18 min of blowing the eggs evenly using the dropper. Eggs might be blown violently for the first 10 min, and then carefully and gently during the next 8 min. A dissecting microscope was required to examine the proportion of dechorionated eggs. When the chorions of the majority of eggs (~ 80%) were removed, the dechorionated eggs were concentrated by gently swirling the dish to gather them in the center. They were then transferred to an agarose-coated dish and washed with FSW five times to clean the residual dechorionation solution. The dechorionated eggs were used either for incubation or electrical transfer.
Using a pipette, 300 μL of seawater with the required amount of dechorionated eggs was transferred into a 1.5 mL tube holding 80 μL of ddH2O, 80 μg plasmid DNA and 420 μL of electrotransfer solution (electroporation solution: 6.3 g mannitol, 5 mL FSW, and 45 mL ddH2O). The solution was then gently mixed and transferred into a cuvette, which was placed in a holder. After electroporation with suitable parameters (45 V voltage, 2000–2500 µF capacitance, and 4 mm electrode cuvette width), the sample was gently transferred into a 90 mm 0.1% agarose-coated dish with FSW and incubated for about 10 min. Gently swirlling the dish enabled the eggs to be concentrated in the center and transferred into a new dish. The embryos were then allowed to develop at 18 ℃.
Two types of tissue-specific genes of S. clava were obtained from homologous Epi1 and MA1 genes (Chiba et al. 1998) in Ciona. The upstream 3 kb promoters of these were amplified from the genome of S. clava by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with Phanta® Max Super-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (Vazyme, P505-d1). The vectors without promoters were reverse-amplified from fluorescent protein clones pEGFP or tdTomato with an identical polymerase. After purification by electrophoresis, the promoter recombined with one fluorescent protein vector, i.e., pEGFP or ptdTomato, by homologous recombination (Vazyme ClonExpress® Ⅱ One Step Cloning Kit, C112-01) to create a tissue-specific fluorescent labeling clone. The primers and templates used are presented in Supplementary Table S2. The expression clones were sequenced with the primers shown in Supplementary Table S2 and promoter transfection efficiency was verified by electroporation.
Time-lapse imaging movies from zygote development to swimming larva after dechorionation were taken using differential interference contrast (DIC) microscopy (OLYMPUS IX73). The room temperature was maintained at 23 ℃ by an air conditioner and the images were acquired every 1–3 min.
Confocal images were taken with a ZEISS confocal laser scanning microscope (CLSM) equipped with 20X (Numerical aperture: 0.75) and 63X oil immersion objectives (NA: 1.4). Z-series images were taken at intervals of 0.8–1 µm, resulting in stacks of 80–100 images. Image analysis and 3D reconstruction were performed with ZEISS software packages. Some of the lengthier embryos were photographed integrally using the tile function. Adobe Photoshop and ImageJ were used to pseudocolor the images. Embryos were fixed every 0.5–1 h from the fertilization of the egg to the hatching larva stage. Distinct representative embryos in each stage (Fig. 1) were chosen based on the C. intestinalis staging criteria from CLSM data (Hotta et al. 2007). Because of the dark color of S. clava embryos, the whole embryo could not be scanned directly, and only the fluorescence signal from appromaxiately half the thickness of the embryo could be received. Therefore, the 3D reconstructed images displayed in the Results section were all half embryos, and the ventral and dorsal images of the same period were from different individuals. Cortical actin filaments were stained using Alexa FluorTM 488 Phalloidin (ThermoFisher, A12379).
The online version contains supplementary material available at https://doi.org/10.1007/s42995-023-00200-2.
This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFC2601304; 2022YFC2601302), the Science & Technology Innovation Project of Laoshan Laboratory (LSKJ202203002), and the Taishan Scholar Program of Shandong Province, China (to BD). Database Construction was supported by the Research Institute of Marine Invertebrates (IKU2021-02), the Keio University Doctorate Student Grant-in-Aid Program from Ushioda Memorial Fund and JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number JP 22J22628, and Keio Gijuku Education with a ResearchAdjusted Budget to TTS.
BD conceived and guided the study. BL and WS collected the samples and performed the experiments. BL and WS prepared the figures and wrote the manuscript. TS constructed the website. QL assisted with defining the stages of embryogenesis. BD, QL, HY, and TS revised and edited the manuscript. All authors contributed to the article and approved the submitted version.
The authors declare that most datasets generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Author Bo Dong is a member of the Editorial Board, but he was not involved in the journal's review of, or decision related to this manuscript.
All of the procedures involved in the handling and treatment of ascidians in this study were approved by the Ocean University of China Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (OUC-IACUC) prior to the initiation of the study (Approval number 2020–0082-0101, 8 September 2020). All experiments and relevant methods were carried out in accordance with the approved guidelines and regulations of OUC-IACUC.
Abbott DP, Johnson JV (1972) The ascidians Styela barnharti, S. plicata, S. clava, and S. montereyensis in Californian waters. Bull South Calif Acad Sci 71:95–105
|
Bhattachan P, Qiao R, Dong B (2020) Identification and population genetic comparison of three ascidian species based on mtDNA sequences. Ecol Evol 10:3758–3768 doi: 10.1002/ece3.6171
|
Brozovic M, Martin C, Dantec C, Dauga D, Mendez M, Simion P, Percher M, Laporte B, Scornavacca C, Di Gregorio A, Fujiwara S, Gineste M, Lowe EK, Piette J, Racioppi C, Ristoratore F, Sasakura Y, Takatori N, Brown TC, Delsuc F et al (2016) ANISEED 2015: a digital framework for the comparative developmental biology of ascidians. Nucl Acids Res 44:D808-818 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv966
|
Chiba S, Satou Y, Nishikata T, Satoh N (1998) Isolation and characterization of cDNA clones for epidermis-specific and muscle-specific genes in Ciona savignyi embryos. Zool Sci 15:239–246 doi: 10.2108/zsj.15.239
|
Christiaen L, Wagner E, Shi W, Levine M (2009) Electroporation of transgenic DNAs in the sea squirt Ciona. Cold Spring Harb Protoc 4: pdb prot5345 doi: 10.1101/pdb.prot5345
|
Cinar ME (2016) The alien ascidian Styela clava now invading the Sea of Marmara (Tunicata: Ascidiacea). Zookeys 563:1–10 doi: 10.3897/zookeys.563.6836
|
Cloney RA (1982) Ascidian larvae and the events of metamorphosis. Am Zool 22:817–826 doi: 10.1093/icb/22.4.817
|
Conklin EG (1905a) The mutation theory from the standpoint of cytology. Science 21:525–529 doi: 10.1126/science.21.536.525
|
Conklin EG (1905b) Organization and cell lineage of the ascidian egg. Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia
|
Corbo JC, Levine M, Zeller RW (1997) Characterization of a notochord-specific enhancer from the Brachyury promoter region of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis. Development 124:589–602 doi: 10.1242/dev.124.3.589
|
Dardaillon J, Dauga D, Simion P, Faure E, Onuma TA, DeBiasse MB, Louis A, Nitta KR, Naville M, Besnardeau L, Reeves W, Wang K, Fagotto M, Gueroult-Bellone M, Fujiwara S, Dumollard R, Veeman M, Volff JN, Roest Crollius H, Douzery E et al (2020) ANISEED 2019: 4D exploration of genetic data for an extended range of tunicates. Nucl Acids Res 48:D668–D675
|
Davis MH, Davis ME (2010) The impact of the ascidian Styela clava Herdman on shellfish farming in the Bassin de Thau, France. J Appl Ichthyol 26:12–18 doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0426.2010.01496.x
|
Dehal P, Satou Y, Campbell RK, Chapman J, Degnan B, De Tomaso A, Davidson B, Di Gregorio A, Gelpke M, Goodstein DM, Harafuji N, Hastings KE, Ho I, Hotta K, Huang W, Kawashima T, Lemaire P, Martinez D, Meinertzhagen IA, Necula S et al (2002) The draft genome of Ciona intestinalis: insights into chordate and vertebrate origins. Science 298:2157–2167 doi: 10.1126/science.1080049
|
Delsuc F, Brinkmann H, Chourrout D, Philippe H (2006) Tunicates and not cephalochordates are the closest living relatives of vertebrates. Nature 439:965–968 doi: 10.1038/nature04336
|
Dumollard R, Minc N, Salez G, Aicha SB, Bekkouche F, Hebras C, Besnardeau L, McDougall A (2017) The invariant cleavage pattern displayed by ascidian embryos depends on spindle positioning along the cell's longest axis in the apical plane and relies on asynchronous cell divisions. eLife 6:e19290 doi: 10.7554/eLife.19290
|
Dupont L, Viard F, Dowell MJ, Wood C, Bishop JD (2009) Fine- and regional-scale genetic structure of the exotic ascidian Styela clava (Tunicata) in southwest England, 50 years after its introduction. Mol Ecol 18:442–453 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2008.04045.x
|
Funakoshi HM, Shito TT, Oka K, Hotta K (2021) Developmental table and three-dimensional embryological image resource of the ascidian Ascidiella aspersa. Front Cell Dev Biol 9:789046 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2021.789046
|
Goldstien SJ, Schiel DR, Gemmell NJ (2010) Regional connectivity and coastal expansion: differentiating pre-border and post-border vectors for the invasive tunicate Styela clava. Mol Ecol 19:874–885 doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2010.04527.x
|
Guignard L, Fiuza UM, Leggio B, Laussu J, Faure E, Michelin G, Biasuz K, Hufnagel L, Malandain G, Godin C, Lemaire P (2020) Contact area-dependent cell communication and the morphological invariance of ascidian embryogenesis. Science 369:6500 doi: 10.1126/science.aar5663
|
Hashimoto H, Robin FB, Sherrard KM, Munro EM (2015) Sequential contraction and exchange of apical junctions drives zippering and neural tube closure in a simple chordate. Dev Cell 32:241–255 doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2014.12.017
|
Hibino T, Nishikata T, Nishida H (1998) Centrosome-attracting body: a novel structure closely related to unequal cleavages in the ascidian embryo. Dev Growth Differ 40:85–95 doi: 10.1046/j.1440-169X.1998.t01-5-00010.x
|
Hotta K, Dauga D, Manni L (2020) The ontology of the anatomy and development of the solitary ascidian Ciona: the swimming larva and its metamorphosis. Sci Rep 10:17916 doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73544-9
|
Hotta K, Mitsuhara K, Takahashi H, Inaba K, Oka K, Gojobori T, Ikeo K (2007) A web-based interactive developmental table for the ascidian Ciona intestinalis, including 3D real-image embryo reconstructions: Ⅰ. From fertilized egg to hatching larva. Dev Dyn 236:1790–1805 doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21188
|
Jiang D, Smith WC (2007) Ascidian notochord morphogenesis. Dev Dyn 236:1748–1757 doi: 10.1002/dvdy.21184
|
Kobayashi K, Satou Y (2018) Microinjection of exogenous nucleic acids into eggs: Ciona species. Adv Exp Med Biol 1029:5–13 doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-7545-2_2
|
Kogure YS, Muraoka H, Koizumi WC, Gelin-Alessi R, Godard B, Oka K, Heisenberg CP, Hotta K (2022) Admp regulates tail bending by controlling ventral epidermal cell polarity via phosphorylated myosin localization in Ciona. Development 149:dev200215 doi: 10.1242/dev.200215
|
Kourakis MJ, Bostwick M, Zabriskie A, Smith WC (2021) Left/right asymmetry disruptions and mirror-image reversals to behavior and brain anatomy in Ciona. bioRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.03.03.433807
|
Locke A, Hanson JM, Ellis KM, Thompson J, Rochette R (2007) Invasion of the southern Gulf of St. Lawrence by the clubbed tunicate (Styela clava Herdman): Potential mechanisms for invasions of Prince Edward Island estuaries. J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 342:69–77 doi: 10.1016/j.jembe.2006.10.016
|
Lu Q, Bhattachan P, Dong B (2019) Ascidian notochord elongation. Dev Biol 448:147–153 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2018.11.009
|
Lu Q, Gao Y, Fu Y, Peng H, Shi W, Li B, Lv Z, Feng XQ, Dong B (2020) Ciona embryonic tail bending is driven by asymmetrical notochord contractility and coordinated by epithelial proliferation. Development 147:24 doi: 10.1242/dev.185868
|
Matsunobu S, Sasakura Y (2015) Time course for tail regression during metamorphosis of the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Dev Biol 405:71–81 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.06.016
|
McDougall A, Chenevert J, Godard BG, Dumollard R (2019) Emergence of embryo shape during cleavage divisions. Results Probl Cell Differ 68:127–154 doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-23459-1_6
|
McDougall A, Chenevert J, Lee KW, Hebras C, Dumollard R (2011) Cell cycle in ascidian eggs and embryos. In: Kubiak JZ (ed) Cell cycle in development. Results and problems in cell differentiation. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 153–169
|
Mizotani Y, Suzuki M, Hotta K, Watanabe H, Shiba K, Inaba K, Tashiro E, Oka K, Imoto M (2018) 14-3-3εa directs the pulsatile transport of basal factors toward the apical domain for lumen growth in tubulogenesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:E8873–E8881 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1808756115
|
Negishi T, Takada T, Kawai N, Nishida H (2007) Localized PEM mRNA and protein are involved in cleavage-plane orientation and unequal cell divisions in ascidians. Curr Biol 17:1014–1025 doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2007.05.047
|
Nicol D, Meinertzhagen IA (1988a) Development of the central nervous system of the larva of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis L. Ⅰ. The early lineages of the neural plate. Dev Biol 130:721–736 doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90363-6
|
Nicol D, Meinertzhagen IA (1988b) Development of the central nervous system of the larva of the ascidian, Ciona intestinalis L. Ⅱ. Neural plate morphogenesis and cell lineages during neurulation. Dev Biol 130:737–766 doi: 10.1016/0012-1606(88)90364-8
|
Nishida H (2005) Specification of embryonic axis and mosaic development in ascidians. Dev Dyn 233:1177–1193 doi: 10.1002/dvdy.20469
|
Oonuma K, Tanaka M, Nishitsuji K, Kato Y, Shimai K, Kusakabe TG (2016) Revised lineage of larval photoreceptor cells in Ciona reveals archetypal collaboration between neural tube and neural crest in sensory organ formation. Dev Biol 420:178–185 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2016.10.014
|
Peng H, Qiao R, Dong B (2020) Polarity establishment and maintenance in ascidian notochord. Front Cell Dev Biol 8:597446 doi: 10.3389/fcell.2020.597446
|
Sasaki H, Yoshida K, Hozumi A, Sasakura Y (2014) CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene knockout in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis. Dev Growth Differ 56:499–510 doi: 10.1111/dgd.12149
|
Satoh N (1994) Developmental biology of ascidians. Cambridge University Press, New York
|
Satoh N (2013) A brief introduction to ascidians. In: Satoh N (ed) Developmental genomics of ascidians. Wiley-Blackwell, Hoboken, pp 1–7
|
Satou Y, Nakamura R, Yu D, Yoshida R, Hamada M, Fujie M, Hisata K, Takeda H, Satoh N (2019) A nearly complete genome of Ciona intestinalis type A (C. robusta) reveals the contribution of inversion to chromosomal evolution in the genus Ciona. Genome Biol Evol 11:3144–3157 doi: 10.1093/gbe/evz228
|
Small KS, Brudno M, Hill MM, Sidow A (2007) Extreme genomic variation in a natural population. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:5698–5703 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0700890104
|
Stolfi A, Gandhi S, Salek F, Christiaen L (2014) Tissue-specific genome editing in Ciona embryos by CRISPR/Cas9. Development 141:4115–4120 doi: 10.1242/dev.114488
|
Swalla BJ (1993) Mechanisms of gastrulation and tail formation in ascidians. Microsc Res Tech 26:274–284 doi: 10.1002/jemt.1070260403
|
Tassy O, Dauga D, Daian F, Sobral D, Robin F, Khoueiry P, Salgado D, Fox V, Caillol D, Schiappa R, Laporte B, Rios A, Luxardi G, Kusakabe T, Joly JS, Darras S, Christiaen L, Contensin M, Auger H, Lamy C et al (2010) The ANISEED database: digital representation, formalization, and elucidation of a chordate developmental program. Genome Res 20:1459–1468 doi: 10.1101/gr.108175.110
|
Villa LA, Patricolo E (2000) The follicle cells of Styela plicata (Ascidiacea, Tunicata): a sem study. Zoolog Sci 17:1115–1121 doi: 10.2108/zsj.17.1115
|
Wagner E, Stolfi A, Gi Choi Y, Levine M (2014) Islet is a key determinant of ascidian palp morphogenesis. Development 141:3084–3092 doi: 10.1242/dev.110684
|
Wakai MK, Nakamura MJ, Sawai S, Hotta K, Oka K (2021) Two-round Ca2+ transient in papillae by mechanical stimulation induces metamorphosis in the ascidian Ciona intestinalis type A. Proc R Soc B 288:20203207 doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.3207
|
Wei J, Zhang J, Lu Q, Ren P, Guo X, Wang J, Li X, Chang Y, Duan S, Wang S, Yu H, Zhang X, Yang X, Gao H, Dong B (2020) Genomic basis of environmental adaptation in the leathery sea squirt (Styela clava). Mol Ecol Resour 20:1414–1431 doi: 10.1111/1755-0998.13209
|
Yamaji S, Hozumi A, Matsunobu S, Sasakura Y (2020) Orchestration of the distinct morphogenetic movements in different tissues drives tail regression during ascidian metamorphosis. Dev Biol 465:66–78 doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2020.07.009
|
Zeller RW (2018) Electroporation in ascidians: history, theory and protocols. In: Sasakura Y (ed) Transgenic ascidians. Springer, Singapore, pp 37–48
|
Zhao L, Gao F, Gao S, Liang Y, Long H, Lv Z, Su Y, Ye N, Zhang L, Zhao C, Wang X, Song W, Zhang S, Dong B (2021) Biodiversity-based development and evolution: the emerging research systems in model and non-model organisms. Sci China Life Sci 64:1236–1280 doi: 10.1007/s11427-020-1915-y
|
1. | Chiara Anselmi, Katherine J. Ishizuka, Karla J. Palmeri, et al. Speed vs completeness: a comparative study of solitary and colonial tunicate embryogenesis. Frontiers in Cell and Developmental Biology, 2025, 13 DOI:10.3389/fcell.2025.1540212 |
2. | Alessandro Pennati, Miloš Jakobi, Fan Zeng, et al. Optimizing CRISPR/Cas9 approaches in the polymorphic tunicate Ciona intestinalis. Developmental Biology, 2024, 510: 31. DOI:10.1016/j.ydbio.2024.03.003 |
3. | Hongan Long, Bo Dong. Special topic on EvoDevo: emerging models and perspectives. Marine Life Science & Technology, 2023, 5(4): 431. DOI:10.1007/s42995-023-00208-8 |
Different Enzyme | Chitosana | NaClOb | Proteinase Ec | ||||||
Dechorionation solution components | Chitosan | 2 mL | NaClO | 0.05 mL or 0.1 mL | Proteinase E | 0.05% | |||
Acetic acid | 0.2 mL | FSW | Up to 10 mL | Sodium thioglycolate | 1% | 1% | 1.5% | 1% | |
FSW | 10 mL | 10N NaOH (µL) | 48 | 55 | 55 | 60 | |||
FSW | Up to 10 mL | ||||||||
Dechorionation duration (min) | > 30 min | < 6 min | 20 | 18 | 19.5 | 17.5 | |||
Dechorionation efficiency | Chorions unremovable | Oocytes destructed | × | √ | × | × | |||
Using chitosana for over 30 min failed to remove the chorions. Using NaClOb, the oocytes were destroyed before the chorions. Using different concentrations of NaOH and sodium thioglycolatec, the dechorionation time did not alter significantly and abnormalities of embryos were more likely to arise |
Voltage | Different voltage | Different capacitance | ||||||
60 V | 50 V | 45 V | 40 V | 45 V | 45 V | 45 V | ||
Capacitance | 2500/2000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 3000 µF | 2500/2000 µF | 1500 µF | |
Transfection efficiency | × a | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | × | |
Normal development | × | × | √ | √ | × | √ | √ | |
Using higher voltage values improved transfection efficiency but damaged the egg in identical capacitance conditions. We were unable to determine plasmid transfection at 60 V (a) since the eggs were entirely broken and undeveloped. Under the same voltage condition, similarly, higher capacitance values improved transfection but reduced viability |
Stage | Characteristics | Measurement of embryos | |||
Time after fertilization | % Hatch | Tail/trunk ratio | |||
Ⅰ. Zygote period (0–0.8 h) | |||||
St. 1 | One cell | Zygote, the fertilized egg | 0 | 0% | |
Ⅱ. Cleavage period (0.8–3 h) | |||||
St. 2 | Two-cell | The embryo is composed of two cells | 50 min | 9% | |
St. 3 | Four-cell | The embryo is composed of four cells | 1 h 10 min | 12% | |
St. 4 | Eight-cell | The embryo is composed of eight cells | 1 h 24 min | 14% | |
St. 5a | Early 16-cell | The embryo is composed of 16 cells, Blastomeres are uncompacted | 1 h 40 min | 17% | |
St. 5b | Late 16-cell | The embryo is composed of 16 cells, Blastomeres have been compacted | 1 h 55 min | 20% | |
St. 6a | Early 32-cell | The embryo is composed of 32 cells, Blastomeres are uncompacted | 2 h 03 min | 21% | |
St. 6b | Late 32-cell | The embryo is composed of 32 cells, Blastomeres have been compacted | 2 h 12 min | 23% | |
St. 7 | 44-cell | The embryo is composed of 44 cells. Bulging in vegetal blastomeres | 2 h 21 min | 24% | |
St. 8 | 64-cell | The embryo is composed of 64 cells | 2 h 36 min | 27% | |
St. 9 | 76-cell | The embryo is composed of 76 cells. Planarization on its vegetal side in preparation for gastrulation | 2 h 47 min | 29% | |
Ⅲ. Gastrula period (3–4 h) | |||||
St. 10 | Initial gastrula | Gastrulation starts with the apical constriction of A7.1 blastomeres, which is the center of invagination | 2 h 57 min | 30% | |
St. 11 | Early gastrula | The vegetal side of the embryo has a horseshoe shape | 3 h 09 min | 32% | |
St. 12 | Mid-gastrula | The blastopore is located posteriorly and is still open. The embryo starts to lengthen along the a-p axis and is no longer spherical | 3 h 40 min | 38% | |
St. 13 | Late gastrula | The blastopore is located posteriorly and is nearly closed | 3 h 57 min | 41% | |
Ⅳ. Neurula period (4–4.8 h) | |||||
St. 14 | Early neurula | Neural plate forms a furrow. The blastopore is completely closed | 4 h 04 min | 42% | |
St. 15 | Mid-neurula | The embryo has an oval shape. A-line cells create a neural fold | 4 h 20 min | 45% | |
St. 16 | Late neurula | The neural tube closure starts in the posterior part | 4 h 37 min | 48% | 0.9 |
Ⅴ. Tailbud period (4.8–10 h) | |||||
St. 17 | Initial tailbud | First indication of a separation between trunk and tail parts in this stage | 4 h 47 min | 49% | 1.0 |
St. 18 | Early tailbud | A few anterior notochord cells finish intercalation and the neuropore has just closed | 5 h 10 min | 53% | 1.4 |
St. 19 | Mid-tailbud | Intercalation of the notochord cells is completed. Tail twice as long as trunk | 5 h 52 min | 60% | 1.9 |
St. 20 | Late tailbud Ⅰ | The pigmentation of the otolith starts | 7 h 07 min | 73% | 2.3 |
St. 21 | Late tailbud Ⅱ | On the verge of hatching. Tail four times as long as trunk | 9 h 06 min | 88% | 4.3 |
Ⅵ. Larva period (10 h) | |||||
St. 22 | Hatching larva | Hatching. Swimming instantly. The trunk has an elongated rectangular shape | 9 h 43 min | 100% | 3.5 |
A total of 22 stages were divided into six periods. Columns from left to right: "Characteristics" were primarily based on observations of specimens under a dissecting microscope. "Measurement of embryos": Time after fertilization (23 ℃, n = 5), % hatch = rate of T (min)/583 (min), and ratio of tail/trunk length |
Stage | Styela clava | Ciona robusta | Ascidiella aspersa | |||||||
Tail/trunkratio | Trunk length (µm) | Tail Length (µm) | Corresponding stage | Tail/trunk ratio | Trunk length (µm) | Tail Length (µm) | Tail/trunk ratio | |||
St. 16 | Late neurula | 0.9 | 100.3 ± 3.1 | 98.1 ± 10.4 | St. 16 | 1.0 | 85.3 | 84.2 | ||
St. 17 | Initial tailbud | 1.0 | 98.0 ± 1.8 | 105.6 ± 6.5 | St. 17 | 1.0 | 89.9 | 87.8 | 0.9 | |
St. 18 | Early tailbud | 1.4 | 97.0 ± 1.2 | 132.5 ± 3.4 | St. 19 | 1.2 | 103.0 | 120.3 | 1.0 | |
St. 19 | Mid-tailbud | 1.9 | 113.6 ± 0.9 | 216.7 ± 15.7 | St. 21 | 1.6 | 114.3 | 180.7 | 1.5 | |
St. 20 | Late tailbud Ⅰ | 2.3 | 118.6 ± 1.1 | 279.9 ± 18.9 | St. 23 | 2.1 | 118.9 | 255.1 | 2.0 | |
St. 21 | Late tailbud Ⅱ | 4.3 | 127.0 ± 0.8 | 548.8 ± 7.3 | St. 25 | 3.9 | 143.7 | 558.6 | 2.8 | |
St. 22 | Hatching larva | 3.5 | 178.3 ± 3.0 | 641.7 ± 14.2 | St. 26 | 4.2 | 159.3 | 661.6 | 3.0 | |
Tail-to-trunk ratios and lengths of trunk and tail (each stage, n = 3) from seven stages of late neurula to hatching larva (stages 16–22) in S. clava. "Corresponding stage" corresponds to C. robusta at the same stage as S. clava. The data of C. robusta and A. aspersa are from the literature (Funakoshi et al. 2021; Hotta et al. 2007) |