+Advanced Search
Volume 3 Issue 2
Apr.  2021
Article Contents

Citation:

One cell at a time:droplet-based microbial cultivation, screening and sequencing

  • Corresponding author: Wenbin Du, wenbin@im.ac.cn
  • Received Date: 2020-05-29
    Accepted Date: 2020-07-22
    Published online: 2021-01-19
  • SPECIAL TOPIC: Cultivation of uncultured microorganisms.
  • Edited by Chengchao Chen.
  • Microbes thrive and, in turn, influence the earth's environment, but most are poorly understood because of our limited capacity to reveal their natural diversity and function. Developing novel tools and effective strategies are critical to ease this dilemma and will help to understand their roles in ecology and human health. Recently, droplet microfluidics is emerging as a promising technology for microbial studies with value in microbial cultivating, screening, and sequencing. This review aims to provide an overview of droplet microfluidics techniques for microbial research. First, some critical points or steps in the microfluidic system are introduced, such as droplet stabilization, manipulation, and detection. We then highlight the recent progress of droplet-based methods for microbiological applications, from high-throughput single-cell cultivation, screening to the targeted or whole-genome sequencing of single cells.
  • 加载中
  • Abate AR, Weitz DA (2011) Faster multiple emulsification with drop splitting. Lab Chip 11:1911-1915 doi: 10.1039/c0lc00706d
    Abate AR, Hung T, Mary P, Agresti JJ, Weitz DA (2010) High-throughput injection with microfluidics using picoinjectors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:19163-19166 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1006888107
    Agresti JJ, Antipov E, Abate AR, Ahn K, Rowat AC, Baret JC, Marquez M, Klibanov AM, Griffiths AD, Weitz DA (2010) Ultrahigh-throughput screening in drop-based microfluidics for directed evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:4004-4009 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0910781107
    Autour A, Ryckelynck M (2017) Ultrahigh-throughput improvement and discovery of enzymes using droplet-based microfluidic screening. Micromachines 8:128 doi: 10.3390/mi8040128
    Bai Y, He X, Liu D, Patil SN, Bratton D, Huebner A, Hollfelder F, Abell C, Huck WTS (2010) A double droplet trap system for studying mass transport across a droplet-droplet interface. Lab Chip 10:1281-1285 doi: 10.1039/b925133b
    Baret J (2012) Surfactants in droplet-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 12:422-433 doi: 10.1039/C1LC20582J
    Baret J, Miller OJ, Taly V, Ryckelynck M, El-Harrak A, Frenz L, Rick C, Samuels ML, Hutchison JB, Agresti JJ, Link DR, Weitz DA, Griffiths AD (2009) Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS): efficient microfluidic cell sorting based on enzymatic activity. Lab Chip 9:1850-1858 doi: 10.1039/b902504a
    Blainey PC (2013) The future is now: single-cell genomics of bacteria and archaea. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37:407-427 doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12015
    Blattman SB, Jiang W, Oikonomou P, Tavazoie S (2020) Prokaryotic single-cell RNA sequencing by in situ combinatorial indexing. Nat Microbiol 5:1-10 doi: 10.1038/s41564-019-0652-x
    Boedicker JQ, Li L, Kline TR, Ismagilov RF (2008) Detecting bacteria and determining their susceptibility to antibiotics by stochastic confinement in nanoliter droplets using plug-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 8:1265-1272 doi: 10.1039/b804911d
    Boedicker JQ, Vincent ME, Ismagilov RF (2009) Microfluidic confinement of single cells of bacteria in small volumes initiates high-density behavior of quorum sensing and growth and reveals its variability. Angew Chem Int Edit 48:5908-5911 doi: 10.1002/anie.200901550
    Boers SA, Hays JP, Jansen R (2015) Micelle PCR reduces chimera formation in 16S rRNA profiling of complex microbial DNA mixtures. Sci Rep-UK 5:14181 doi: 10.1038/srep14181
    Burmeister A, Grünberger A (2020) Microfluidic cultivation and analysis tools for interaction studies of microbial co-cultures. Curr Opin Biotech 62:106-115 doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2019.09.001
    Burmeister A, Hilgers F, Langner A, Westerwalbesloh C, Kerkhoff Y, Tenhaef N, Drepper T, Kohlheyer D, von Lieres E, Noack S, Grünberger A (2019) A microfluidic co-cultivation platform to investigate microbial interactions at defined microenvironments. Lab Chip 19:98-110 doi: 10.1039/C8LC00977E
    Chen D, Liu S, Du W (2019) Chemotactic screening of imidazolinone-degrading bacteria by microfluidic SlipChip. J Hazard Mater 366:512-519 doi: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2018.12.029
    Chijiiwa R, Hosokawa M, Kogawa M, Nishikawa Y, Ide K, Sakanashi C, Takahashi K, Takeyama H (2020) Single-cell genomics of uncultured bacteria reveals dietary fiber responders in the mouse gut microbiota. Microbiome 8:5 doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0779-2
    Chiou PY, Ohta AT, Wu MC (2005) Massively parallel manipulation of single cells and microparticles using optical images. Nature 436:370-372 doi: 10.1038/nature03831
    Chiu FWY, Stavrakis S (2019) High-throughput droplet-based microfluidics for directed evolution of enzymes. Electrophoresis 40:2860-2872 doi: 10.1002/elps.201900222
    Chowdhury MS, Zheng W, Kumari S, Heyman J, Zhang X, Dey P, Weitz DA, Haag R (2019) Dendronized fluorosurfactant for highly stable water-in-fluorinated oil emulsions with minimal inter-droplet transfer of small molecules. Nat Commun 10:4546 doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-12462-5
    Christopher GF, Anna SL (2007) Microfluidic methods for generating continuous droplet streams. J Phys D Appl Phys 40:R319-R336 doi: 10.1088/0022-3727/40/19/R01
    Clausell-Tormos J, Lieber D, Baret JC, El-Harrak A, Miller OJ, Frenz L, Blouwolff J, Humphry KJ, Koster S, Duan H, Holtze C, Weitz DA, Griffiths AD, Merten CA (2008) Droplet-based microfluidic platforms for the encapsulation and screening of mammalian cells and multicellular organisms. Chem Biol 15:427-437 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2008.04.004
    Courtois F, Olguin LF, Whyte G, Theberge AB, Huck WTS, Hollfelder F, Abell C (2009) Controlling the retention of small molecules in emulsion microdroplets for use in cell-based bssays. Anal Chem 81:3008-3016 doi: 10.1021/ac802658n
    Cramer C, Fischer P, Windhab EJ (2004) Drop formation in a co-flowing ambient fluid. Chem Eng Sci 59:3045-3058 doi: 10.1016/j.ces.2004.04.006
    Daniel R (2005) The metagenomics of soil. Nat Rev Microbiol 3:470-478 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1160
    Davis KER, Sangwan P, Janssen PH (2011) Acidobacteria, Rubrobacteridae and Chloroflexi are abundant among very slow-growing and mini-colony-forming soil bacteria. Environ Microbiol 13:798-805 doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2010.02384.x
    De Bourcy CFA, De Vlaminck I, Kanbar JN, Wang J, Gawad C, Quake SR (2014) A quantitative comparison of single-cell whole genome amplification methods. PLoS ONE 9:e105585 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0105585
    Eastburn DJ, Huang Y, Pellegrino M, Sciambi A, Ptáček LJ, Abate AR (2015) Microfluidic droplet enrichment for targeted sequencing. Nucleic Acids Res 43:e86 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkv297
    Falkowski PG, Barber RT, Smetacek V (1998) Biogeochemical controls and feedbacks on ocean primary production. Science 281:200-207 doi: 10.1126/science.281.5374.200
    Fenneteau J, Chauvin D, Griffiths AD, Nizak C, Cossy J (2017) Synthesis of new hydrophilic rhodamine based enzymatic substrates compatible with droplet-based microfluidic assays. Chem Commun 53:5437-5440 doi: 10.1039/C7CC01506B
    Frenz L, Blank K, Brouzes E, Griffiths AD (2009) Reliable microfluidic on-chip incubation of droplets in delay-lines. Lab Chip 9:1344-1348 doi: 10.1039/B816049J
    Fu Y, Li C, Lu S, Zhou W, Tang F, Xie XS, Huang Y (2015) Uniform and accurate single-cell sequencing based on emulsion whole-genome amplification. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:11923-11928 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1513988112
    Garcia SL (2016) Mixed cultures as model communities: hunting for ubiquitous microorganisms, their partners, and interactions. Aquat Microb Ecol 77:79-85 doi: 10.3354/ame01789
    Gielen F, Hours R, Emond S, Fischlechner M, Schell U, Hollfelder F (2016) Ultrahigh-throughput-directed enzyme evolution by absorbance-activated droplet sorting (AADS). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:E7383-E7389 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1606927113
    Girault M, Kim H, Arakawa H, Matsuura K, Odaka M, Hattori A, Terazono H, Yasuda K (2017) An on-chip imaging droplet-sorting system: a real-time shape recognition method to screen target cells in droplets with single cell resolution. Sci Rep-UK 7:40072 doi: 10.1038/srep40072
    Griffiths AD, Tawfik DS (2006) Miniaturising the laboratory in emulsion droplets. Trends Biotechnol 24:395-402 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2006.06.009
    Gruner P, Riechers B, Chacòn Orellana LA, Brosseau Q, Maes F, Beneyton T, Pekin D, Baret J (2015) Stabilisers for water-in-fluorinated-oil dispersions: Key properties for microfluidic applications. Curr Opin Colloid In 20:183-191 doi: 10.1016/j.cocis.2015.07.005
    Gruner P, Riechers B, Semin B, Lim J, Johnston A, Short K, Baret J (2016) Controlling molecular transport in minimal emulsions. Nat Commun 7:10392 doi: 10.1038/ncomms10392
    Guo MT, Rotem A, Heyman JA, Weitz DA (2012) Droplet microfluidics for high-throughput biological assays. Lab Chip 12:2146-2155 doi: 10.1039/c2lc21147e
    Habbu P, Warad V, Shastri R, Madagundi S, Kulkarni VH (2016) Antimicrobial metabolites from marine microorganisms. Chin J Nat Medicines 14:101-116 doi: 10.1016/S1875-5364(16)60003-1
    Hassan S, Zhang X (2020) Microfluidics as an emerging platform for tackling antimicrobial resistance (AMR): a Review. Curr Anal Chem 16:41-51 doi: 10.2174/1573411015666181224145845
    He X, McLean JS, Edlund A, Yooseph S, Hall AP, Liu S, Dorrestein PC, Esquenazi E, Hunter RC, Cheng G, Nelson KE, Lux R, Shi W (2015) Cultivation of a human-associated TM7 phylotype reveals a reduced genome and epibiotic parasitic lifestyle. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:244-249 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1419038112
    Holland-Moritz DA, Wismer MK, Mann BF, Farasat I, Devine P, Guetschow ED, Mangion I, Welch CJ, Moore JC, Sun S, Kennedy RT (2020) Mass activated droplet sorting (MADS) enables high-throughput screening of enzymatic reactions at nanoliter scale. Angew Chem Int Edit 59:4470-4477 doi: 10.1002/anie.201913203
    Holtze C, Rowat AC, Agresti JJ, Hutchison JB, Angilè FE, Schmitz CHJ, Köster S, Duan H, Humphry KJ, Scanga RA, Johnson JS, Pisignano D, Weitz DA (2008) Biocompatible surfactants for water-in-fluorocarbon emulsions. Lab Chip 8:1632-1639 doi: 10.1039/b806706f
    Hori M, Fukano H, Suzuki Y (2007) Uniform amplification of multiple DNAs by emulsion PCR. Biochem Bioph Res Co 352:323-328 doi: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2006.11.037
    Hosokawa M, Nishikawa Y, Kogawa M, Takeyama H (2017) Massively parallel whole genome amplification for single-cell sequencing using droplet microfluidics. Sci Rep-UK 7:5199 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-05436-4
    Hu B, Xu B, Yun J, Wang J, Xie B, Li C, Yu Y, Lan Y, Zhu Y, Dai X, Huang Y, Huang L, Pan J, Du W (2020) High-throughput single-cell cultivation reveals the underexplored rare biosphere in deep-sea sediments along the Southwest Indian Ridge. Lab Chip 20:363-372 doi: 10.1039/C9LC00761J
    Hultman J, Tamminen M, Pärnänen K, Cairns J, Karkman A, Virta M (2018) Host range of antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment plant influent and effluent. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 94: fiy038 
    Huys GR, Raes J (2018) Go with the flow or solitary confinement: a look inside the single-cell toolbox for isolation of rare and uncultured microbes. Curr Opin Microbiol 44:1-8 doi: 10.1016/j.mib.2018.05.002
    Jakiela S, Kaminski TS, Cybulski O, Weibel DB, Garstecki P (2013) Bacterial growth and adaptation in microdroplet chemostats. Angew Chem Int Edit 52:8908-8911 doi: 10.1002/anie.201301524
    Jarosz DF, Brown JCS, Walker GA, Datta MS, Ung WL, Lancaster AK, Rotem A, Chang A, Newby GA, Weitz DA, Bisson LF, Lindquist S (2014) Cross-kingdom chemical communication drives a heritable, mutually beneficial prion-based transformation of metabolism. Cell 158:1083-1093 doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.07.025
    Ji P, Zhang Y, Wang J, Zhao F (2017) MetaSort untangles metagenome assembly by reducing microbial community complexity. Nat Commun 8:14306 doi: 10.1038/ncomms14306
    Jian X, Guo X, Wang J, Tan ZL, Xing X, Wang L, Zhang C (2020) Microbial microdroplet culture system (MMC): an integrated platform for automated, high-throughput microbial cultivation and adaptive evolution. Biotechnol Bioeng 117:1724-1737 doi: 10.1002/bit.27327
    Jiang C, Dong L, Zhao J, Hu X, Shen C, Qiao Y, Zhang X, Wang Y, Ismagilov RF, Liu S, Du W (2016) High-throughput single-cell cultivation on microfluidic streak plates. Appl Environ Microb 82:2210-2218 doi: 10.1128/AEM.03588-15
    Kaeberlein T, Lewis K, Epstein SS (2002) Isolating "uncultivable" microorganisms in pure culture in a simulated natural environment. Science 296:1127-1129 doi: 10.1126/science.1070633
    Kaminski TS, Scheler O, Garstecki P (2016) Droplet microfluidics for microbiology: techniques, applications and challenges. Lab Chip 16:2168-2187 doi: 10.1039/C6LC00367B
    Kaushik AM, Hsieh K, Chen L, Shin DJ, Liao JC, Wang T (2017) Accelerating bacterial growth detection and antimicrobial susceptibility assessment in integrated picoliter droplet platform. Biosens Bioelectron 97:260-266 doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2017.06.006
    Kim HJ, Boedicker JQ, Choi JW, Ismagilov RF (2008) Defined spatial structure stabilizes a synthetic multispecies bacterial community. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105:18188-18193 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0807935105
    Kintses B, Hein C, Mohamed MF, Fischlechner M, Courtois F, Lainé C, Hollfelder F (2012) Picoliter cell lysate assays in microfluidic droplet compartments for directed enzyme evolution. Chem Biol 19:1001-1009 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2012.06.009
    Köster S, Angilè FE, Duan H, Agresti JJ, Wintner A, Schmitz C, Rowat AC, Merten CA, Pisignano D, Griffiths AD, Weitz DA (2008) Drop-based microfluidic devices for encapsulation of single cells. Lab Chip 8:1110-1115 doi: 10.1039/b802941e
    Lagier J, Khelaifia S, Alou MT, Ndongo S, Dione N, Hugon P, Caputo A, Cadoret F, Traore SI, Seck EH, Dubourg G, Durand G, Mourembou G, Guilhot E, Togo A, Bellali S, Bachar D, Cassir N, Bittar F, Delerce J et al (2016) Culture of previously uncultured members of the human gut microbiota by culturomics. Nat Microbiol 1:16203 doi: 10.1038/nmicrobiol.2016.203
    Lan F, Demaree B, Ahmed N, Abate AR (2017) Single-cell genome sequencing at ultra-high-throughput with microfluidic droplet barcoding. Nat Biotechnol 35:640-646 doi: 10.1038/nbt.3880
    Laxminarayan R, Duse A, Wattal C, Zaidi AK, Wertheim HF, Sumpradit N, Vlieghe E, Hara GL, Gould IM, Goossens H, Greko C, So AD, Bigdeli M, Tomson G, Woodhouse W, Ombaka E, Peralta AQ, Qamar FN, Mir F, Kariuki S et al (2013) Antibiotic resistance-the need for global solutions. Lancet Infect Dis 13:1057-1098 doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(13)70318-9
    Lewis K (2013) Platforms for antibiotic discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 12:371-387 doi: 10.1038/nrd3975
    Liao S, Tao X, Ju Y, Feng J, Du W, Wang Y (2017) Multichannel dynamic interfacial printing: an alternative multicomponent droplet generation technique for lab in a drop. Acs Appl Mater Inter 9:43545-43552 doi: 10.1021/acsami.7b16456
    Link DR, Anna SL, Weitz DA, Stone HA (2004) Geometrically mediated breakup of drops in microfluidic devices. Phys Rev Lett 92:054503 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.054503
    Liu W, Kim HJ, Lucchetta EM, Du W, Ismagilov RF (2009) Isolation, incubation, and parallel functional testing and identification by FISH of rare microbial single-copy cells from multi-species mixtures using the combination of chemistrode and stochastic confinement. Lab Chip 9:2153-2162 doi: 10.1039/b904958d
    Lok C (2015) Mining the microbial dark matter. Nature 522:270-273 doi: 10.1038/522270a
    Luka G, Ahmadi A, Najjaran H, Alocilja E, DeRosa M, Wolthers K, Malki A, Aziz H, Althani A, Hoorfar M (2015) Microfluidics integrated biosensors: a leading technology towards lab-on-a-chip and sensing applications. Sensors 15:30011-30031 doi: 10.3390/s151229783
    Lundberg DS, Yourstone S, Mieczkowski P, Jones CD, Dangl JL (2013) Practical innovations for high-throughput amplicon sequencing. Nat Methods 10:999-1002 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2634
    Ma L, Kim J, Hatzenpichler R, Karymov MA, Hubert N, Hanan IM, Chang EB, Ismagilov RF (2014) Gene-targeted microfluidic cultivation validated by isolation of a gut bacterium listed in Human Microbiome Project's Most Wanted taxa. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:9768-9773 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404753111
    Mamanova L, Coffey AJ, Scott CE, Kozarewa I, Turner EH, Kumar A, Howard E, Shendure J, Turner DJ (2010) Target-enrichment strategies for next-generation sequencing. Nat Methods 7:111-118 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.1419
    Marcy Y, Ishoey T, Lasken RS, Stockwell TB, Walenz BP, Halpern AL, Beeson KY, Goldberg SMD, Quake SR (2007) Nanoliter reactors improve multiple displacement amplification of genomes from single cells. PLoS Genet 3:e155 doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0030155
    Marcy Y, Ouverney C, Bik EM, Losekann T, Ivanova N, Martin HG, Szeto E, Platt D, Hugenholtz P, Relman DA, Quake SR (2007) Dissecting biological "dark matter" with single-cell genetic analysis of rare and uncultivated TM7 microbes from the human mouth. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:11889-11894 doi: 10.1073/pnas.0704662104
    Martin K, Henkel T, Baier V, Grodrian A, Schön T, Roth M, Michael Köhler J, Metze J (2003) Generation of larger numbers of separated microbial populations by cultivation in segmented-flow microdevices. Lab Chip 3:202-207 doi: 10.1039/B301258C
    Mashaghi S, Abbaspourrad A, Weitz DA, van Oijen AM (2016) Droplet microfluidics: a tool for biology, chemistry and nanotechnology. TRAC-Trend Anal Chem 82:118-125 doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2016.05.019
    Mayr LM, Bojanic D (2009) Novel trends in high-throughput screening. Curr Opin Pharmacol 9:580-588 doi: 10.1016/j.coph.2009.08.004
    Mazutis L, Baret J, Treacy P, Skhiri Y, Araghi AF, Ryckelynck M, Taly V, Griffiths AD (2009) Multi-step microfluidic droplet processing: kinetic analysis of an in vitro translated enzyme. Lab Chip 9:2902-2908 doi: 10.1039/b907753g
    Nai C, Meyer V (2018) From axenic to mixed cultures: technological advances accelerating a paradigm shift in microbiology. Trends Microbiol 26:538-554 doi: 10.1016/j.tim.2017.11.004
    Najah M, Calbrix R, Mahendra-Wijaya IP, Beneyton T, Griffiths AD, Drevelle A (2014) Droplet-based microfluidics platform for ultra-high-throughput bioprospecting of cellulolytic microorganisms. Chem Biol 21:1722-1732 doi: 10.1016/j.chembiol.2014.10.020
    Nichols D, Cahoon N, Trakhtenberg EM, Pham L, Mehta A, Belanger A, Kanigan T, Lewis K, Epstein SS (2010) Use of ichip for high-throughput in situ cultivation of "uncultivable" microbial species. Appl Environ Microb 76:2445-2450 doi: 10.1128/AEM.01754-09
    Obexer R, Godina A, Garrabou X, Mittl PRE, Baker D, Griffiths AD, Hilvert D (2017) Emergence of a catalytic tetrad during evolution of a highly active artificial aldolase. Nat Chem 9:50-56 doi: 10.1038/nchem.2596
    Ostafe R, Prodanovic R, Lloyd Ung W, Weitz DA, Fischer R (2014) A high-throughput cellulase screening system based on droplet microfluidics. Biomicrofluidics 8:41102 doi: 10.1063/1.4886771
    Pan M, Rosenfeld L, Kim M, Xu M, Lin E, Derda R, Tang SKY (2014) Fluorinated pickering emulsions impede interfacial transport and form rigid interface for the growth of anchorage-dependent cells. Acs Appl Mater Inter 6:21446-21453 doi: 10.1021/am506443e
    Park J, Kerner A, Burns MA, Lin XN (2011) Microdroplet-enabled highly parallel co-cultivation of microbial communities. PLoS ONE 6:e17019 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017019
    Pham VHT, Kim J (2012) Cultivation of unculturable soil bacteria. Trends Biotechnol 30:475-484 doi: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2012.05.007
    Pinheiro LB, Coleman VA, Hindson CM, Herrmann J, Hindson BJ, Bhat S, Emslie KR (2012) Evaluation of a droplet digital polymerase chain reaction format for DNA copy number quantification. Anal Chem 84:1003-1011 doi: 10.1021/ac202578x
    Prakadan SM, Shalek AK, Weitz DA (2017) Scaling by shrinking: empowering single-cell "omics" with microfluidic devices. Nat Rev Genet 18:345-361 
    Pratt SL, Zath GK, Akiyama T, Williamson KS, Franklin MJ, Chang CB (2019) DropSOAC: stabilizing microfluidic drops for time-lapse quantification of single-cell bacterial physiology. Front Microbiol 10:2112 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02112
    Qiao Y, Zhao X, Zhu J, Tu R, Dong L, Wang L, Dong Z, Wang Q, Du W (2018) Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting of lipolytic microorganisms using a compact optical system. Lab Chip 18:190-196 doi: 10.1039/C7LC00993C
    Qin H, Wang S, Feng K, He Z, Virta MPJ, Hou W, Dong H, Deng Y (2019) Unraveling the diversity of sedimentary sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) across Tibetan saline lakes using epicPCR. Microbiome 7:71 doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0688-4
    Rausch P, Rühlemann M, Hermes BM, Doms S, Dagan T, Dierking K, Domin H, Fraune S, von Frieling J, Hentschel U, Heinsen F, Höppner M, Jahn MT, Jaspers C, Kissoyan KAB, Langfeldt D, Rehman A, Reusch TBH, Roeder T, Schmitz RA et al (2019) Comparative analysis of amplicon and metagenomic sequencing methods reveals key features in the evolution of animal metaorganisms. Microbiome 7:133 doi: 10.1186/s40168-019-0743-1
    Rinke C, Schwientek P, Sczyrba A, Ivanova NN, Anderson IJ, Cheng J, Darling A, Malfatti S, Swan BK, Gies EA, Dodsworth JA, Hedlund BP, Tsiamis G, Sievert SM, Liu W, Eisen JA, Hallam SJ, Kyrpides NC, Stepanauskas R, Rubin EM et al (2013) Insights into the phylogeny and coding potential of microbial dark matter. Nature 499:431-437 doi: 10.1038/nature12352
    Rinke C, Lee J, Nath N, Goudeau D, Thompson B, Poulton N, Dmitrieff E, Malmstrom R, Stepanauskas R, Woyke T (2014) Obtaining genomes from uncultivated environmental microorganisms using FACS-based single-cell genomics. Nat Protoc 9:1038-1048 doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.067
    Roach LS, Song H, Ismagilov RF (2005) Controlling nonspecific protein adsorption in a plug-based microfluidic system by controlling interfacial chemistry using fluorous-phase surfactants. Anal Chem 77:785-796 doi: 10.1021/ac049061w
    Roca I, Akova M, Baquero F, Carlet J, Cavaleri M, Coenen S, Cohen J, Findlay D, Gyssens I, Heure OE, Kahlmeter G, Kruse H, Laxminarayan R, Liébana E, López-Cerero L, MacGowan A, Martins M, Rodríguez-Baño J, Rolain JM, Segovia C et al (2015) The global threat of antimicrobial resistance: science for intervention. New Microbes and New Infections 6:22-29 doi: 10.1016/j.nmni.2015.02.007
    Saleski TE, Kerner AR, Chung MT, Jackman CM, Khasbaatar A, Kurabayashi K, Lin XN (2019) Syntrophic co-culture amplification of production phenotype for high-throughput screening of microbial strain libraries. Metab Eng 54:232-243 doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2019.04.007
    Sánchez BJ, Lee J, Kang D (2019) Recent advances in droplet-based microfluidic technologies for biochemistry and molecular biology. Micromachines 10:412 doi: 10.3390/mi10060412
    Sciambi A, Abate AR (2015) Accurate microfluidic sorting of droplets at 30 kHz. Lab Chip 15:47-51 doi: 10.1039/C4LC01194E
    Shang L, Cheng Y, Zhao Y (2017) Emerging droplet microfluidics. Chem Rev 117:7964-8040 doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00848
    Shao K, Ding W, Wang F, Li H, Ma D, Wang H (2011) Emulsion PCR: a high efficient way of PCR amplification of random DNA libraries in aptamer selection. PLoS One 6:e24910 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0024910
    Sharon I, Banfield JF (2013) Genomes from metagenomics. Science 342:1057 doi: 10.1126/science.1247023
    Shemesh J, Ben Arye T, Avesar J, Kang JH, Fine A, Super M, Meller A, Ingber DE, Levenberg S (2014) Stationary nanoliter droplet array with a substrate of choice for single adherent/nonadherent cell incubation and analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:11293-11298 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1404472111
    Shen C, Xu P, Huang Z, Cai D, Liu S, Du W (2014) Bacterial chemotaxis on SlipChip. Lab Chip 14:3074-3080 doi: 10.1039/C4LC00213J
    Singer E, Bushnell B, Coleman-Derr D, Bowman B, Bowers RM, Levy A, Gies EA, Cheng J, Copeland A, Klenk H, Hallam SJ, Hugenholtz P, Tringe SG, Woyke T (2016) High-resolution phylogenetic microbial community profiling. ISME J 10:2020-2032 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.249
    Skhiri Y, Gruner P, Semin B, Brosseau Q, Pekin D, Mazutis L, Goust V, Kleinschmidt F, El Harrak A, Hutchison JB, Mayot E, Bartolo J, Griffiths AD, Taly V, Baret J (2012) Dynamics of molecular transport by surfactants in emulsions. Soft Matter 8:10618-10627 doi: 10.1039/c2sm25934f
    Song H, Chen DL, Ismagilov RF (2006) Reactions in droplets in microfluidic channels. Angew Chem Int Edit 45:7336-7356 doi: 10.1002/anie.200601554
    Spencer SJ, Tamminen MV, Preheim SP, Guo MT, Briggs AW, Brito IL, Weitz DA, Pitkänen LK, Vigneault F, Virta MP, Alm EJ, (2016) Massively parallel sequencing of single cells by epicPCR links functional genes with phylogenetic markers. ISME J 10:427-436 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2015.124
    Tanaka T, Kawasaki K, Daimon S, Kitagawa W, Yamamoto K, Tamaki H, Tanaka M, Nakatsu CH, Kamagata Y (2014) A hidden pitfall in the preparation of agar media undermines microorganism cultivability. Appl Environ Microb 80:7659-7666 doi: 10.1128/AEM.02741-14
    Tao Y, Rotem A, Zhang H, Chang CB, Basu A, Kolawole AO, Koehler SA, Ren Y, Lin JS, Pipas JM, Feldman AB, Wobus CE, Weitz DA (2015) Rapid, targeted and culture-free viral infectivity assay in drop-based microfluidics. Lab Chip 15:3934-3940 doi: 10.1039/C5LC00556F
    Teh S, Lin R, Hung L, Lee AP (2008) Droplet microfluidics. Lab Chip 8:198-220 doi: 10.1039/b715524g
    Terekhov SS, Smirnov IV, Malakhova MV, Samoilov AE, Manolov AI, Nazarov AS, Danilov DV, Dubiley SA, Osterman IA, Rubtsova MP, Kostryukova ES, Ziganshin RH, Kornienko MA, Vanyushkina AA, Bukato ON, Ilina EN, Vlasov VV, Severinov KV, Gabibov AG, Altman S (2018) Ultrahigh-throughput functional profiling of microbiota communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:9551-9556 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811250115
    Thorsen T, Roberts RW, Arnold FH, Quake SR (2001) Dynamic pattern formation in a vesicle-generating microfluidic device. Phys Rev Lett 86:4163-4166 doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.4163
    Venter JC, Remington K, Heidelberg JF, Halpern AL, Rusch D, Eisen JA, Wu D, Paulsen I, Nelson KE, Nelson W, Fouts DE, Levy S, Knap AH, Lomas MW, Nealson K, White O, Peterson J, Hoffman J, Parsons R, Baden-Tillson H et al (2004) Environmental genome shotgun sequencing of the sargasso sea. Science 304:66 doi: 10.1126/science.1093857
    Wagner O, Thiele J, Weinhart M, Mazutis L, Weitz DA, Huck WTS, Haag R (2016) Biocompatible fluorinated polyglycerols for droplet microfluidics as an alternative to PEG-based copolymer surfactants. Lab Chip 16:65-69 doi: 10.1039/C5LC00823A
    Wang X, Ren L, Su Y, Ji Y, Liu Y, Li C, Li X, Zhang Y, Wang W, Hu Q, Han D, Xu J, Ma B (2017) Raman-activated droplet sorting (RADS) for label-free high-throughput screening of microalgal single-cells. Anal Chem 89:12569-12577 doi: 10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03884
    Whitesides GM (2006) The origins and the future of microfluidics. Nature 442:368-373 doi: 10.1038/nature05058
    Woyke T, Doud DFR, Schulz F (2017) The trajectory of microbial single-cell sequencing. Nat Methods 14:1045-1054 doi: 10.1038/nmeth.4469
    Xi H, Zheng H, Guo W, Gañán-Calvo AM, Ai Y, Tsao C, Zhou J, Li W, Huang Y, Nguyen N, Tan SH (2017) Active droplet sorting in microfluidics: a review. Lab Chip 17:751-771 doi: 10.1039/C6LC01435F
    Xiao H, Bao Z, Zhao H (2015) High throughput screening and selection methods for directed enzyme evolution. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:4011-4020 doi: 10.1021/ie503060a
    Xu Y, Zhao F (2018) Single-cell metagenomics: challenges and applications. Protein Cell 9:501-510 doi: 10.1007/s13238-018-0544-5
    Xu P, Modavi C, Demaree B, Twigg F, Liang B, Sun C, Zhang W, Abate AR (2020) Microfluidic automated plasmid library enrichment for biosynthetic gene cluster discovery. Nucleic Acids Res 48:e48 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkaa131
    Yun J, Zheng X, Xu P, Zheng X, Xu J, Cao C, Fu Y, Xu B, Dai X, Wang Y, Liu H, Yi Q, Zhu Y, Wang J, Wang L, Dong Z, Huang L, Huang Y, Du W (2019) Interfacial nanoinjection-based nanoliter single-cell analysis. Small 16:1903739 
    Zengler K, Toledo G, Rappe M, Elkins J, Mathur EJ, Short JM, Keller M (2002) Nonlinear partial differential equations and applications: Cultivating the uncultured. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:15681-15686 doi: 10.1073/pnas.252630999
    Zhang C, Kim S (2010) Research and application of marine microbial enzymes: status and prospects. Mar Drugs 8:1920-1934 doi: 10.3390/md8061920
    Zhang H, Wang X (2016) Modular co-culture engineering, a new approach for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 37:114-121 doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2016.05.007
    Zhang K, Qin S, Wu S, Liang Y, Li J (2020) Microfluidic systems for rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) at the single-cell level. Chem Sci 11:6352-6361 doi: 10.1039/D0SC01353F
    Zhou N, Sun YT, Chen DW, Du W, Yang H, Liu SJ (2018) Harnessing microfluidic streak plate technique to investigate the gut microbiome of Reticulitermes chinensis. Microbiologyopen 8:e654 
    Zhu Y, Fang Q (2013) Analytical detection techniques for droplet microfluidics-a review. Anal Chim Acta 787:24-35 doi: 10.1016/j.aca.2013.04.064
    Zhu P, Wang L (2017) Passive and active droplet generation with microfluidics: a review. Lab Chip 17:34-75 doi: 10.1039/C6LC01018K
  • 加载中
通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
  • 1. 

    沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

  1. 本站搜索
  2. 百度学术搜索
  3. 万方数据库搜索
  4. CNKI搜索

Figures(10) / Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views(1797) PDF downloads(1) Cited by()

Related
Proportional views

One cell at a time:droplet-based microbial cultivation, screening and sequencing

    Corresponding author: Wenbin Du, wenbin@im.ac.cn
  • 1. State Key Laboratory of Microbial Resources, Institute of Microbiology Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China
  • 2. Department of Biomedical Devices, Bioland Laboratory (Guangzhou Regenerative Medicine and Health Guangdong Laboratory), Guangzhou 510320, China
  • 3. College of Life Sciences, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 4. Savaid Medical School, University of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 5. Bioengineering and Therapeutic Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94158, USA

Abstract: Microbes thrive and, in turn, influence the earth's environment, but most are poorly understood because of our limited capacity to reveal their natural diversity and function. Developing novel tools and effective strategies are critical to ease this dilemma and will help to understand their roles in ecology and human health. Recently, droplet microfluidics is emerging as a promising technology for microbial studies with value in microbial cultivating, screening, and sequencing. This review aims to provide an overview of droplet microfluidics techniques for microbial research. First, some critical points or steps in the microfluidic system are introduced, such as droplet stabilization, manipulation, and detection. We then highlight the recent progress of droplet-based methods for microbiological applications, from high-throughput single-cell cultivation, screening to the targeted or whole-genome sequencing of single cells.

    HTML

Introduction
  • Microorganisms are a rich reservoir of industrially relevant enzymes and medicinally valuable compounds. However, most microbes are still uncultured—the so-called 'dark matter' in microbiology (Lok 2015). Dissecting and screening the microbial 'dark matter' is essential to understand their physiological and ecological roles and remains as a central task in microbial resource exploration. To overcome the limitations of traditional methods, many new cultivation techniques have been introduced, such as simulated in situ cultivation (e.g., diffusion chamber and iChip) (Kaeberlein et al. 2002; Nichols et al. 2010), microencapsulation cultivation combined with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Zengler et al. 2002) and microfluidics-based cultivation methods (Boedicker et al. 2009; Jakiela et al. 2013; Jiang et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2009; Ma et al. 2014; Park et al. 2011; Shen et al. 2014). The advent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) has further enabled researchers to bypass cultivation and sequence bulk DNA directly after extraction from a highly diverse community, i.e., metagenomic sequencing. Metagenomic sequencing has become a critical technique to read otherwise inaccessible microbial genomes (Daniel 2005; Venter et al. 2004). Technology advances have overcome many challenges and enabled single-cell sequencing to be performed on environmental and human microbiome samples (Woyke et al. 2017). The genomic information on single cells is a starting point for the design of culture conditions to 'tame' the missing microbes.

    Microfluidics is a new research field that offers novel solutions to a variety of biological problems. It manipulates fluids at the microscale with micro-channels at sizes of tens to hundreds of microns (Whitesides 2006). Multiple disciplines are involved in microfluidics, such as nanotechnology, engineering, physics, materials science, chemistry, and biology (Luka et al. 2015; Sánchez Barea et al. 2019). Microfluidics can integrate a series of laboratory operations onto a microfluidic chip, such as sample processing, reactions, cell culture, and measurement (Shang et al. 2017). Droplet-based microfluidics is one of the main fields of microfluidics, and it has shown its advantages in microbiology for high-throughput single-cell cultivation (Huys and Raes 2018; Jakiela et al. 2013; Jiang et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2009), microbial co-cultivation (Burmeister and Grunberger 2020; Park et al. 2011; Saleski et al. 2019; Terekhov et al. 2018), targeted sequencing (Boers et al. 2015; Hultman et al. 2018; Qin et al. 2019; Spencer et al. 2016; Xu et al. 2020), and single-cell sequencing (Chijiiwa et al. 2020; Hosokawa et al. 2017; Lan et al. 2017; Yun et al. 2019).

    For microbial cultivation and screening, droplets can offer an independent space for cells to divide and block the effects of competitors or predators (Huys and Raes 2018). This can lead to advantages such as microscale, single-cell resolution, high-throughput, low cost, and automation potential. Microbes may behave differently at the microscale than at the macroscale. For instance, a single cell can initiate quorum sensing within a femtoliter droplets (Boedicker et al. 2009). Due to the ultra-small volume of droplets, it is easy to achieve high-throughput cultivation and screening with limited space and cost. Within the microfluidic droplets, many analysis tools can be integrated for high-resolution analysis and detection: imaging-based (bright-field/fluorescence microscopy), laser-induced fluorescence, Raman spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and absorption detection (Zhu and Fang 2013). Automated systems can be built, such as the microfluidic droplet-based chemostats, which can cultivate, analyze the growth, and perform time-serial dilution to maintain the status of growth in nanoliter droplets. (Jakiela et al. 2013; Jian et al. 2020).

    For microbial single-cell sequencing, droplet methods have lower cost, a lower contamination rate, higher throughput, and a higher genome recovery due to the miniaturization of droplets. The droplet-based single-cell sequencing has a lower cost compared to standard single-cell sequencing because of the reduction in the reaction volume of the genomic amplification from microliter to nanoliter or picoliter (Prakadan et al. 2017). Minimizing the volume of single-cell amplification also reduces the probability of contamination (Blainey 2013; Marcy et al. 2007a; Xu and Zhao 2018). Ultra-high-throughput single-cell sequencing can be realized by encapsulating unique barcodes and microbial cells in microdroplets for cell lysis, whole genome amplification, and library construction for sequencing (Lan et al. 2017). Although the factors responsible for the bias of single-cell amplification is unclear, there are many reports indicating that reducing the amplification volume can improve the genomic coverage (De Bourcy et al. 2014; Fu et al. 2015; Marcy et al. 2007a).

    Many aspects of this technology have been reviewed, such as droplet formation, droplet detection, droplet sorting techniques, and the application of droplets in biology (Mashaghi et al. 2016; Shang et al. 2017; Xi et al. 2017; Zhu and Wang 2017; Zhu and Fang 2013). Few reviews have reported on the application of microfluidic droplets in microbiology (Guo et al. 2012; Kaminski et al. 2016). This review covers the current developments and future perspective of microfluidic droplet-based tools for microbial cultivation, screening, and sequencing (Fig. 1). First of all, some important functional modules of droplet manipulation for microbiological researches are briefly introduced, and a short summary of the basic considerations of droplet operation and detection are also provided. Then, the applications of droplet microfluidics in microbiology are introduced from six aspects: single-cell cultivation tools for uncultured microbes, high-throughput microbial co-cultivation in droplets, high-throughput single-cell screening with fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS) for enzyme discovery, rapid antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST), microbial targeted sequencing and single-cell whole-genome sequencing (Fig. 1). Finally, we discuss the opportunities and challenges for applying droplet microfluidics in the exploration of marine microorganisms.

    Figure 1.  Schematic illustration of the applications of microfluidics in microbiological research at six aspects in this review

Droplet microfluidics

    Manipulation of droplets

  • Droplet microfluidics uses immiscible multiphase flows inside the microfluidic channels to generate and manipulate discrete droplets with volumes ranging from the nanoliter to the femtoliter (Teh et al. 2008). Each individual microfluidic droplet is separated by an immiscible phase and can be a vessel for reaction (Song et al. 2006). Microfluidic droplets have several advantages over conventional bioreactors, such as flasks, Petri dishes, and multi-well plates. The first is miniaturization: The droplets are confined to ultra-small volumes with the very efficient mass-heat transfer, low reagents cost, and significant surface effects (Kaminski et al. 2016). The second is high-throughput: By decreasing the volume of droplets to the ultra-small regime, many droplets can be generated and manipulated as reactors (Mashaghi et al. 2016). The third is monodispersity: the droplets are monodispersed at the diameters of nanometers to micrometers. This is important in chemical or biochemical reactions with uniform droplets (Guo et al. 2012). Effective and precise manipulation of droplets is critical for bioanalysis. There are various functional modules to manipulate and analyze the droplets, such as droplet generation, incubation, dividing, merging, and sorting (Shang et al. 2017). Droplet manipulation modules have been reviewed extensively and the most commonly used ones are shown in Table 1. Every single module can be used independently and multiple modules can also be integrated on a microfluidic chip for specific microbiology applications.

    Manipulation Representative schematic Function and application in microbiology
    Generation Generate monodispersed droplets (Christopher and Anna 2007; Cramer et al. 2004; Thorsen et al. 2001): (1) microbial single-cell isolation (Martin et al. 2003); (2) massive single-cell encapsulation using droplets (Baret et al. 2009)
    Incubation Incubate droplets under suitable condition and time (Frenz et al. 2009; Köster et al. 2008): (1) microbial cell growth and enzyme expression on-chip or off-chip (Najah et al. 2014); (2) precisely control enzyme–substrate reaction time (Obexer et al. 2017)
    Dividing Divide the droplets into duplicated daughter droplets (Link et al. 2004): (1) multiplexed droplet generation for single-cell encapsulation (Abate and Weitz 2011); (2) dividing droplet arrays after cultivation droplets generation to create duplication of droplets library (Liu et al. 2009)
    Merging Merge droplets or add regents to droplets (Abate et al. 2010; Mazutis et al. 2009): (1) add substrate for controlled enzymatic reaction (Qiao et al. 2018); (2) co-cultivation (Guo et al. 2012); (3) virus–host interaction (Tao et al. 2015)
    Sorting Transport and subset the droplets of interest (Baret et al. 2009): (1) directed evolution of microbial strains or enzymes (Gielen et al. 2016); (2) microbial community screening (Najah et al. 2014)

    Table 1.  Functional modules of droplet manipulation and applications in microbiology

  • Surfactants for microfluidic droplets

  • Surfactants are amphiphilic molecules that contain both hydrophilic and hydrophobic groups. In water–oil droplets emulsion, surfactant molecules absorb at the oil–water interface to prevent droplet coalescence (Fig. 2) (Baret 2012). The surfactant is crucial for droplets stability during droplet manipulation. Most droplet manipulations (except for droplet generation) are difficult without surfactants because of droplet coalescence. Thus, surfactants play a fundamental role in microfluidic droplet manipulation and are key to stabilizing droplets as a micro-bioreactor. Considerations in the selection of a surfactant include biocompatibility, stability, and molecular exchange. Biocompatibility is a prerequisite need because the enzyme activity and cell viability within the droplets should not be inhibited by the surfactant (Clausell-Tormos et al. 2008; Roach et al. 2005).

    Figure 2.  Schematic illustrates surfactant molecules to stabilize aqueous droplets. The amphiphilic molecules were added to the oil phase to maintain droplets as a stable micro-reactor

    Stability is essential for droplets serving as bioreactors. In a droplet-based digital PCR reaction, the droplets must be stable after many cycles of PCR; the surfactant plays an important role in stability (Pinheiro et al. 2012). It is worth noting that the droplet is not a perfectly sealed container. Small molecules may be exchanged between closely located droplets over time. The proper selection of surfactant and oil can effectively suppress this process (Bai et al. 2010; Chowdhury et al. 2019; Gruner et al. 2016; Pan et al. 2014). The hydrophobic group of the surfactant molecule extends into the oil, and thus the oil phase is another important factor for the selection of surfactants. Hydrocarbon oils and fluorocarbon oils are two main types of continuous phase for w/o droplet emulsion. Of hydrocarbons, hexadecane is the most commonly used oil, and the corresponding surfactants are Span 80, Tween 20/80, etc. Fluorocarbon oils are widely used in cell culture, enzyme reaction and PCR because of their good gas permeability and the immiscibility of non-fluorinated molecules. Many fluorocarbons are commercially available, such as FC-40, FC-77, HFE 7500, and HFE 7100 from 3M. Many surfactants have been developed for fluorocarbon oil, such as Krytox (DuPont), DMP-PFPE (dimorpholinophosphinate perfluoropolyether), PEG-PFPE (block copolymer of polyethylene glycol and perfluoropolyether), LPG-PFPE (block copolymer of linear polyglycerol and perfluoropolyether), and fluorinated nanoparticles (F-NPs) (Baret 2012; Gruner et al. 2015; Holtze et al. 2008; Pan et al. 2014; Wagner et al. 2016). Of these, PEG-PFPE is the most commonly used surfactant because of its good biocompatibility and stabilization effect.

  • Detection of droplets

  • Detectors play an essential role in the application of droplets for microbiology. Different detection approaches allow the detection of droplets, either quantitatively or qualitatively. Many detection techniques can be incorporated for droplet analysis, such as imaging-based analysis (bright-field/fluorescence microscopy), laser-induced fluorescence, Raman spectroscopy, mass spectrometry, and absorption detection. These detectors all have distinct advantages and disadvantages (Table 2). In practical applications, it is important to select the appropriate detection method according to the intrinsic needs of the application.

    Analysis tools Advantages Disadvantages
    Bright-field/fluorescence imaging (Girault et al. 2017; Pratt et al. 2019) Phenotypic identification; widely available microscopes; time-lapse analysis; parallel analysis of large-scale droplet array Low sensitivity; poor ability for molecules analysis
    Light absorption and scattering (Gielen et al. 2016) Cell density detection; label-free; high speed Low detection sensitivity
    Laser-induced fluorescence (Agresti et al. 2010) High analysis speed; high detection sensitivity; low equipment cost High dependence on fluorescent probes design; false-positive due to leakage of fluorescent probes
    Raman or infrared spectroscopy (Wang et al. 2017) Label-free; multiple parameter analysis long reading time compare with fluorescence; interference from matrices and cell status; high equipment cost
    Mass spectrometry (Holland-Moritz et al. 2020) High sensitivity; label-free; high molecular resolution Destructive for live cells; low throughput; high equipment cost

    Table 2.  A comparison of diferent droplet detection methods

Applications of droplet microfluidics in microbiology

    High-throughput single-cell cultivation for uncultured microbes

  • For this application, it is critical to obtain pure cultures of the uncultured microbes from the environment. Developing novel cultivation methods is an effective strategy for the isolation of uncultured microorganisms (Pham and Kim 2012). Because of the merit of single-cell, high-throughput, high-resolution, and low cost, etc., droplets have become a promising approach for the isolation of uncultured microbes (Huys and Raes 2018). Martin et al. (2003) first used monodispersed droplets for high-throughput microbial cultivation. They demonstrated that droplets were a suitable reactor for microbial cultivation starting from a single cell to a very high-cell density. Many novel droplet-based methods were later developed for microbial cultivation. For instance, ultra-small droplets, with a volume down to femtoliter volume, were generated and applied to bacterial quorum sensing. A single cell can also initiate the high-density behavior of quorum sensing (Boedicker et al. 2009). Here we introduce several promising droplet-based technologies for the isolation of uncultured microbes.

    Targeted isolation for uncultured microbes: Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) is a commonly used technique in microbiology with great specificity for microbial identification. A microfluidic device integrating FISH identification and droplets splitting modules has been developed for parallel high-throughput single-cell cultivation and identification (Fig. 3a) (Liu et al. 2009). First, 60 nl droplets were used to encapsulate a single cell and cultivate a mixture of Paenibacillus curdlanolyticus (P. curdlanolyticus, Pc196) and Escherichia coli. After cell growth, a droplet-splitting chip was used to split the droplets into two daughter droplets. One copy of the droplet was added to an agar plate and the other copy was used for FISH identification with a specific probe to Pc196. Finally, the droplet encapsulating the target species was selected from the agar plate, according to the results of FISH identification. This work presented an elegant strategy that combined droplets cultivation and genetic identification for targeted isolation of microbes. Other identification methods, such as 16S rRNA gene sequencing or matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization–time of flight (MALDI–TOF), may also be incorporated into this strategy by splitting droplets to form duplicated copies of microbial populations (Liu et al. 2009). A similar strategy was adopted using a SlipChip device to split 2D droplet arrays for coupling high-throughput single-cell cultivation and 16rRNA PCR for quickly locating the target colonies. As an example, one of the most wanted taxa in the list of the Human Microbiome Project (HMP) was successfully isolated with the SlipChip (Ma et al. 2014). More recently, an integrated microfluidic device was developed, in which electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI–MS) was used for microbial cell identification. Meanwhile, the study integrated microfluidic functional modules, including splitting, incubation, and sorting, into a single device, which they called mass activated droplet sorting (MADS) (Fig. 3b) (Holland-Moritz et al. 2020). Droplets were asymmetrically split into two daughter droplets: one was used for ESI–MS analysis and the target droplet could be selectively sorted according to the results of the ESI–MS data. This device has been successfully applied to the directed evolution of transaminase and also has great potential for uncultured microbe screening (Holland-Moritz et al. 2020).

    Figure 3.  Droplet-based devices for the cultivation of uncultured microbes. a Schematic illustrates the principle for parallel microbial cultivation and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH) identification (Reprinted with permission from Liu et al. 2009. Lab Chip 9: 2153–2162. Copyright (2009) Royal Society of Chemistry). b Schematic of mass activated droplet sorting (MADS) system and the zoom-in microscopic images of the devices showing droplets operation (Reprinted with permission from Holland-Moritz et al. 2020. Angew Chem Int Edit 59: 4470–4477. Copyright (2020) John Wiley & Sons). c Schematic of Microfluidic streak plate (MSP) platform (Reprinted with permission from Chen et al. 2019. J Hazard Mater 366: 512–519. Copyright (2019) Elsevier). d Schematic of semi-automated droplet picker (Fig. 3D, and 3F reprinted with permission from Hu et al. 2020. Lab Chip 20: 363–372. Copyright (2020) Royal Society of Chemistry) e Left, heatmap of amplicon sequencing for comparison of the original community, pooled cells from agar plates, and pooled cells from MSP. Right, parallel comparison of isolated species and number of isolates for agar plate and MSP cultivations (Reprinted with permission from Jiang et al. 2016. Appl Environ Microb 82: 2210–2218. Copyright (2016) American Society for Microbiology). f MSP isolated microorganisms from deep-sea sediments samples

    Microfluidic streak plate (MSP) cultivation: MSP is a simple method for high-throughput single-cell analysis and cultivation with nanoliter droplets (Jiang et al. 2016). This method uses microfluidic chips to generate nanoliter droplets, which can be arrayed on a standard Petri dish prefilled with the carrier oil (Fig. 3c). There are several distinguishing features of MSP compared to traditional agar plate cultivation: (ⅰ) it provides a much higher throughput than traditional agar plates with low consumption; (ⅱ) it avoids interspecific competition and eliminates biases due to differences in growth rates; (ⅲ) droplet storage on Petri dish prefilled with mineral oil allows long-term single-cell cultivation; (ⅳ) it allows microscopic observation during culture; (ⅴ) after cultivation, the droplets can be pooled for microbial community analysis using next-generation sequencing, or easily picked for scale-up cultivation; (ⅵ) liquid medium used by MSP avoids hydrogen peroxide production during gelation of agar, which is more favorable for the isolation of hydrogen peroxide-sensitive microbes (Tanaka et al. 2014).

    The MSP method has been used to isolate several species with a high degradation efficiency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH), including a previously unknown fluoranthene-degrading Blastococcus species (Fig. 3e). Later, Zhou et al. (2018) used the MSP platform under anaerobic conditions to separate several potentially new species and genera from the gut of Reticulitermes chinensis (a wood‐feeding termite). Recently, Chen et al. (2019) successfully incorporated chemotactic screening and MSP to isolate imidazolinone-degrading species from soil samples. The MSP platform was further improved for long-term cultivation to tackle the problem of rare marine microbe isolation (Hu et al. 2020). The improved MSP platform increased the recovery of slow-growing microbes and enabled long-term cultivation of up to five months. Furthermore, a semi-automated droplet picker was developed to facilitate the contamination-free recovery of the target droplets (Fig. 3d). During droplet picking, by comparison with the previous MSP platform, an inverted microscope was used to select droplets, based on morphology, and improved the isolation efficiency. The amplicon sequencing of the pooled cultures of MSP shows that MSP cultivation has a greater ability to reveal rare elements of the microbial biosphere than agar plate cultivation. With the improved MSP, about 15 potentially new species were successfully isolated from deep-sea sediments (Fig. 3f). Overall, these studies demonstrate that MSP can be applied to the microbial cultivation of samples from a variety of environments and can significantly improve the isolation efficiency and throughput of cultivation.

  • Microbial cell–cell interaction: droplet-based co-culture system

  • Microbial co-cultivation is a promising method for the discovery of natural microbial products and the isolation of uncultured microorganisms (He et al. 2015; Nai and Meyer 2018; Zhang and Wang 2016). The main challenge in microbiology is that most microbes cannot be obtained via pure culture in the laboratory. One reason is that the process of obtaining a pure culture may interrupt the physical and chemical interactions between microbes (Garcia 2016). Co-cultivation may offer an appropriate method to meet the communication needs of microbes. Many microfluidic-based co-cultivation methods have been developed, including nanochannel-based co-cultivation, membrane-based co-cultivation, and droplet-based co-cultivation (Burmeister et al. 2019; Kim et al. 2008; Park et al. 2011). The droplet-based co-cultivation system can simultaneously and rapidly analyze millions of microbes in droplets. Here we mainly describe the droplet-based co-cultivation system.

    Park et al. (2011) were the first to report that microfluidic droplets could be used for microbial co-cultivation. Symbiotic bacterial strains were stochastically encapsulated in microfluidic droplets based on a Poisson distribution and each bacterial strain could not live alone (Fig. 4a). When two cross-feeding strains were encapsulated in the same droplet, they both can live and prospered. Over 1000 droplets were stored in the microfluidic chip for simultaneous analysis (Fig. 4b). This work demonstrated that microfluidic droplets could be applied to the massive co-cultivation of microbes. Cross-kingdom communication between yeast and bacteria was also explored with this strategy by Jarosz et al. (2014), who demonstrated that few bacterial cells could induce the metabolic transformation of yeast (Jarosz et al. 2014). This strategy is also used for microbial secondary metabolite screening.

    Figure 4.  Microfluidic droplet-based co-cultivation and its application. a The workflow of droplet co-cultivation. b The cultivation results of microbial droplets co-cultivation with W- and Y- Strains (Adapted from Park et al. 2011. PLOS ONE 6: e17019. followed the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License). c Schematic of using a co-cultivation strategy for bear oral microbiome screening. d The microfluidic droplets with the encapsulation of Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) and oral microbes after cultivation (scale bar 50 μm) (Fig. 4C and 4D reprinted from Terekhov et al. 2018. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 115:9551–9556. followed Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License 4.0 (CC BY-NC-ND))

    A so-called 'Syntrophic Co-culture Amplification of Production phenotype' (SnoCAP) strategy was established by Saleski et al. (2019), who used a cross-feeding screening strategy to screen the Escherichia coli (E. coli) mutagenesis library and isolated a high isobutanol production strain. In another report, the oral microbiome of a Siberian bear and Staphylococcus aureus were co-encapsulated into microfluidic droplets for high-throughput screening of microbes with antimicrobial activity against S. aureus (Fig. 4c, d) (Terekhov et al. 2018). A Bacillus strain with antimicrobial activity against S. aureus was successfully isolated, which demonstrated a promising potential for antibiotics discovery and microbial community analysis.

  • Antibiotic susceptibility testing in droplets

  • Bacterial multi-drug resistance is rapidly increasing and has become a global crisis of public health. The speed of new antibiotic discovery has slowed (Lewis 2013; Roca et al. 2015). One effective strategy is accurate and timely antibiotic prescriptions for patients, but these rely heavily on rapid antibiotic resistance evaluation (Laxminarayan et al. 2013). However, current gold-standard antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs) are time-consuming, heavily depend on bacterial enrichment in media with antibiotics, which may take a few days to undertake. One way to shorten the time of ASTs is to decrease the reaction volume for bacterial growth. Microfluidic-based methods are a promising tool for rapid ASTs because of their miniaturization and automation (Zhang et al. 2020). Various microfluidics-based methods have been developed for ASTs, such as microchamber, microchannel, and droplet-based tools (Hassan and Zhang 2020). Of these, droplet-based methods are commonly used because they generate large-scale droplets, for high-throughput and rapid analysis, and ultra-small volumes for highly sensitive detection.

    An early droplet-based ASTs platform was developed by Boedicker et al. (2008). In this platform, 50 nl droplets were used to encapsulate cells, antibiotics, and medium. Teflon tubing was used for storing droplets (Fig. 5a). Multiple drugs and different drug concentrations could be tested within seven hours. An integrated microfluidic device was further developed by Kaushik et al. (2017) with picoliter droplets, including droplet generation, incubation, and detection (Fig. 5b). The ASTs could be performed within one hour by decreasing the volume of the droplet to 20 pl, but only one drug and fixed concentration could be tested per assay. This method is an endpoint detection, and the kinetic information during cell growth was lost. Another type of rapid ASTs is the stationary nanoliter droplet array reported by Shemesh et al. (2014) who used microwells to confine the droplets, cell growth could be successively monitored with microscopy. The drug gradient can be formed in this device, and the growth of the cells can be monitored with a microscope over time (Fig. 5c). We reported the generation of nanoliter droplets array with a linear drug gradient using the MSP technique (Jiang et al. 2016). The droplets were written onto a 9 cm petri dish following a spiral track. A linear antibiotic drug gradient could be generated in an array of over 2000 droplets to obtain a high-resolution dose–response curve to determine the antibiotic resistance pattern of the pathogen (Jiang et al. 2016).

    Figure 5.  Microfluidic droplet-based platform for rapid antibiotic susceptibility tests (ASTs). a Schematic of a droplet array-based gradient AST system. Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) was tested with serial gradients of antibiotics include LVF (levofloxicin), OXA (oxicillin), VCM (vancomycin), and AMP (ampicillin) (Reprinted with permission from Boedicker et al. 2008. Lab Chip 8: 1265–1272. Copyright (2008) Royal Society of Chemistry). b An integrated microfluidic chip illustrates the principle and workflow for droplet-based high-resolution dose–response profiling (Reprinted with permission from Kaushik et al. 2017. Biosens Bioelectron 97: 260–266. Copyright (2017) Elsevier). c Stationary nanoliter droplets array fixed with microwell illustrates the workflow for AST (Reprinted with permission from Shemesh et al. 2014. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111: 11293–11298. Copyright (2014) National Academy of Sciences, USA.). d Schematic illustrates a chip-free platform of multichannel dynamic interfacial printing (MC-DIP) for AST (Reprinted with permission from Liao et al. 2017. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 9: 43545−43552. Copyright (2017) American Chemical Society)

    Several chip-free droplet generation methods have been applied to antibiotic susceptibility testing, which avoids the complex microfabrication process and high-cost of microfluidic devices. Liao et al. (2017) developed a platform, called multichannel dynamic interfacial printing (MC-DIP), which generates droplets via a vibrating capillary at the oil surface. The MC-DIP can combine a 96-well plate and microscopy for parallel and large-scale ASTs (Fig. 5d). Another example of single-cell resolution ASTs with a chip-free platform is performed using interfacial nanoinjection (INJ) and fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) with flow cytometry (Yun et al. 2019). They used FACS to isolate single-cell in 384-well plates and perform nanoliter-scale ASTs of single microbial cells by displacing nanoliter reagents using INJ to be mixed with single cells. In FACS-INJ based ASTs, microbial cells were sorted into 384-well plates with FACS, and then 100 nl droplets with media, resazurin, and antibiotics were generated with the capillary; finally, the growth of the cells was successively monitored with a fluorescence reader. Compared with traditional plate assays (200 μl), FACS-INJ can provide statistical analysis of antibiotic resistance for a microbial population at single-cell resolution with much lower reagent consumption.

  • High-throughput single-cell screening for enzyme discovery

  • Enzymes are very important in biological, industrial, and environmental studies. Diverse bio-active compounds are produced by microbes and they are an important resource for enzyme discovery (Chiu and Stavrakis 2019). Microbial enzyme screening is a simple and efficient method for discovering enzymes. There are three main methods for high-throughput microbial enzyme screening (Table 3) (Autour and Ryckelynck 2017). The first is microtiter plates (MTPs) screening, which can achieve a screening throughput of up to 105 assays per day with liquid-handling robots or colony pickers robots (Autour and Ryckelynck 2017; Mayr and Bojanic 2009). The second is in vitro compartmentalization-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IVC-FACS), which takes advantage of the compartmentalization of microfluidic droplets and the ultra-high sorting speed of FACS to screen enzymes with a throughput up to 108 assays per hour (Griffiths and Tawfik 2006; Sciambi and Abate 2015). The third is microfluidic droplet-based screening, such as fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS), Raman-activated droplet sorting (RADS), mass-activated droplet sorting (MADS) (Baret et al. 2009; Holland-Moritz et al. 2020; Wang et al. 2017). FADS can achieve a screening throughput of up to 108 assays per hour (Baret et al. 2009; Sciambi and Abate 2015) and is more commonly used than RADS and MADS. In this section, we mainly focus our discussion on FADS screening.

    Screening parameters Microtiter plates (MTP) In vitro compartmentalization-based fluorescence-activated cell sorting (IVC-FACS) Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS)
    Throughput Up to 105/day Up to 108/hour Up to 108/hour
    Time Long Short Short
    Cost High Low Low
    Suitable for multi-step assays Yes No Yes

    Table 3.  Comparison of three high-throughput microbial enzyme screening methods

    While the throughput of MTPs is much lower than IVC-FACS and FADS, the screening cost per assay is much higher. In comparison to FADS, IVC-FACS relies on the generation of a double emulsion, and the droplet content of IVC-FACS is difficult to modify after droplets generation (Griffiths and Tawfik 2006) (Table 3). After the droplet generation, the droplet content of FADS can be modified with droplets fusion. This is more effective in multi-step screening assays than in FACS. FADS uses microfluidic droplets as a reactor and the DEP force as a sorting force, laser-induced fluorescence is used for detection and analysis. The droplet volume used in FADS ranges from several picoliter to hundreds of picoliter. To date, FADS has successfully applied for the screening of β-galactosidase, horseradish peroxidase, sulfatase, cellulase, aldolase, lipase, and others (Agresti et al. 2010; Baret et al. 2009; Fenneteau et al. 2017; Kintses et al. 2012; Obexer et al. 2017; Ostafe et al. 2014; Qiao et al. 2018). The operation of FADS can be divided into the following steps (Baret et al. 2009):

    1) Droplet generation. Microbial cells, medium, and fluorogenic enzyme substrate, were encapsulated within the droplets with microfluidic chip (if the fluorogenic substrate is not suitable to be incubated with microbial cells for a long time, the substrate should be added to droplets with droplet fusion device after droplet incubation).

    2) Droplet incubation. Droplets were incubated off-chip to allow enzyme expression and secretion.

    3) Re-loading droplets. The incubated droplets were re-injected into the microfluidic chip.

    4) Droplet sorting. Droplet fluorescence was detected, and the positive droplets were selected for further experiments.

    The selection of a proper fluorogenic enzyme substrate is extremely important in FADS screening. Two aspects need attention in the selection of a fluorogenic substrate. The first is that the substrate must be compatible with the droplet system and does not lead to undesired droplet coalescence. The second is that the substrate must be effectively retained within the droplets with limited droplet cross-contamination (Skhiri et al. 2012). Several methods have been developed to slow down the leakage and diffusion of small molecules, including fluorogenic substrates among droplets, such as modifying the fluorogenic substrates with higher hydrophilicity, improving the viscosity of the droplets by adding bovine serum albumin (BSA) or carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) and using nanoparticles as a surfactant to avoid surfactant micelles transport of the substrate between droplets (Courtois et al. 2009; Fenneteau et al. 2017).

    Obexer et al. (2017) developed a fully automated FADS device that integrated the modules of droplet generation, incubation and sorting on a single chip for directed evolution of a previously computationally designed enzyme into a highly active enzyme which requires screening of ~ 108 protein variants (Fig. 6). An integrated device was designed to realize high-throughput screening of the aldolases plasmid library in a fully automated manner. The device can sort up to 107 library within 2 h with few manual operations. First, the E. coli cells, substrate, and cell lysis reagents were encapsulated within the droplets with a T-shaped droplet generation module. After droplet formation, the droplets entered the incubation module in which E. coli cells were lysed to release the plasmid encoding a variant of aldolase for cell-free protein expression. The activity of the aldolase was evaluated via the degradation of a preloaded fluorogenic substrate. Finally, the positive droplets with high fluorescence intensity were sorted with a droplet sorting module. After FADS, the activity of the screened aldolase improved 30 fold to give a > 109 rate enhancement compared with the uncatalyzed retro-aldol reaction. This study demonstrates the feasibility and superiority of droplet microfluidics by combining different functional modules.

    Figure 6.  Schematic representation of the integrated microfluidic chip for the directed evolution of aldolases. a Schematic showing the use of aqueous droplets as bioreactors for enzyme directed evolution. b Schematic of the integrated chip, the droplets generation module is shown in blue, the droplets incubation module is shown in red, and the droplet sorting module is shown in green. "-" indicates the negative electrode and " + " is the positive electrode. c Zoom-in schematics and images of the functional modules of the fully automated FADS system (Reprinted with permission from Obexer et al. 2017. Nat Chem 9: 50–56. Copyright (2017) Springer Nature)

  • Droplet microfluidics for targeted sequencing

  • There are two commonly used bulk sequencing strategies: shotgun sequencing and amplicon sequencing (Rausch et al. 2019). Shotgun sequencing, which captures the entire DNA sequence within a sample but generally only represents the most abundant genes, has high costs and bioinformatic demands (Sharon and Banfield 2013). Amplicon sequencing enriches specific microbial groups or genes before sequencing using PCR (Mamanova et al. 2010). Thus, it offers higher resolution for the target genes, functions, or microbial species (Lundberg et al. 2013; Singer et al. 2016). However, bias can be created during the PCR amplification step and this is difficult to remove (Boers et al. 2015). Droplet microfluidics is advantageous for massive encapsulation of single molecules or microbial cells and offers individual and independent reaction containers. The use of droplets can effectively reduce biases caused by inter-sample interference (Hori et al. 2007; Shao et al. 2011).

    Boers et al. (2015) introduced micelle PCR (micPCR) for microbiota profiling (Boers et al. 2015). Conventional NGS-based amplicon sequencing of bacterial 16S rRNA gene is widely used for phylogenetic analysis of a complex microbial community (Boers et al. 2015). However, the presence of multiple PCR targets in a single amplification reaction may lead to amplification chimeras and bias towards the amplification of a subset of genes due to the competitive nature of PCR. micPCR separates template DNA molecules into a large number of water-in-oil emulsions, which reduces chimera formation and PCR competition within the same sample. The results show that micelle PCR reduces chimera formation by a factor of 38 compared with bulk PCR, resulting in improved microbial diversity estimates and generating the robust and accurate 16S microbiota profiles required for comparative studies.

    In addition to amplifying 16S rRNA gene in droplets only for microbiota profiling, Spencer et al. (2016) developed Emulsion, Paired Isolation, and Concatenation PCR (epicPCR) for linking the phylogenetic markers with functional genes from millions of cells in a single experiment (Fig. 7). This method includes the following steps. (1) Single cells are encapsulated in ~ 500 million droplets at a ratio of < 1 cell in 100 drops on average. Acrylamide monomers in the droplets polymerize into polyacrylamide beads with the addition of a catalyst. (2) Cells are lysed in gel beads and the released DNA is trapped inside the beads. (3) Hydrogel beads are then re-emulsified to perform fusion PCR, amplifying the 16S ribosomal RNA gene and a separate target gene. The overlapping of the primers of the two targets will create concatemers containing both the 16S rRNA gene and the target functional gene. (4) After demulsification, fusion amplicons are pooled for a bulk nested PCR followed by NGS. The epicPCR method was demonstrated by linking the dissimilatory sulfate reductase gene dsrB with the 16S rRNA gene and detected both known and novel sulfate reducers in a freshwater lake sample (Spencer et al. 2016). EpicPCR can be extended to determine the host cells of theoretically any target functional gene, providing a throughput of millions of cells, with only the cost of a single sequencing library preparation. This technique has been successfully applied to the study of bacterial hosts of antibiotic resistance genes in wastewater treatment plants and the diversity of sulfate-reducing prokaryotes (SRP) in Tibetan saline lakes (Hultman et al. 2018; Qin et al. 2019).

    Figure 7.  Schematic principle of Emulsion, Paired Isolation, and Concatenation PCR (epicPCR) for the association of functional genes with phylogenetic status at the single-cell level. A Microbial cells in acrylamide suspension are mixed into emulsion oil. The emulsion droplets are polymerized into polyacrylamide beads containing single cells. The emulsion is broken, and the cells in the polyacrylamide beads are treated enzymatically to expose the genomic DNA by destroying cell walls, membranes, and protein components. B Polyacrylamide-trapped, permeabilized microbial cells are encapsulated into an emulsion with fusion PCR reagents. C Fusion PCR first amplifies a target gene with an overhang of 16S rRNA gene homology. With a limiting concentration of overhang primer, the target gene amplicon will anneal and extend into the 16S rRNA gene, forming a fusion product that continues to amplify from a reverse 16S rRNA gene primer. D The fused amplicons only form in the emulsion compartments where a given microbial cell has the target functional gene. e After breaking the emulsion, the fused amplicons are prepared for next-generation sequencing. The resulting DNA sequences are concatemers of the functional gene and the 16S rRNA gene of the same cell (Reprinted from Spencer et al. 2016. ISME J 10: 427–436. followed Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License)

    Droplet microfluidics also enables the enrichment of specific functional gene clusters at high-throughput (Eastburn et al. 2015). Xu et al. (2020) developed the Microfluidic Automated Plasmid Library Enrichment (MAPLE) workflow for isolating and sequencing microbial biosynthetic gene clusters (Fig. 8). Metagenomic libraries are usually used for screening and recovering biosynthetic gene clusters. They are made of bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) or fosmid plasmids that carry hundred-kilobase-length fragments of metagenomic DNA and transformed into E. coli host cells. Traditional plate-based screening methods involve multiple rounds of hundreds of PCR reactions and gel electrophoresis. This is laborious and expensive. MAPLE performs the screening steps using droplet microfluidics with a millionth the normal volume, and at screening throughputs of thousands per second. It comprises four steps.

    Figure 8.  Microfluidic Automated Plasmid Library Enrichment (MAPLE) workflow and associated microfluidic devices. a Overview of MAPLE workflow. b The droplet maker device used for encapsulating single cells. Top, device schematic; middle, enlarged view of the cross junction where droplets are generated; bottom, an image of a single bacterium (red arrow) in the droplet before culture (left) and resulting colony after incubation (right). Scale bar = 20 µm. c Droplet merging device. Left, device schematic. Right, inserts showing magnified views of the three numbered regions. Insert 1, reinjection of close-packed droplets containing cell colonies spaced out by oil flow. Insert 2, pairing of colony droplets (orange) with PCR reagent droplets (blue) at a ~1:1 ratio. Insert 3, the entrance of droplet pairs into merging zone for electro-coalescence. Scale bar = 100 µm. d Droplet sorter device used for sorting fluorescently positive droplets. Top, device schematic. Bottom, inserts showing the junction where droplets are sorted. If a droplet passing the laser (light spot) has a fluorescence signal exceeding the threshold, then the electrode (yellow bar) activates, applying a dielectrophoretic force to pull it into the 'sorted' channel. Scale bar = 100 µm (Reprinted with permission from Xu et al. 2020. Nucleic Acids Res 48: e48. Copyright (2020) Oxford University Press)

    1) Single-cell colony formation in droplets. Individual E. coli cells are encapsulated and cultured in millions of picoliter droplets, where single cells expand into pico-colonies within each droplet.

    2) Target detection by droplet PCR. Each colony-containing droplet is then fused with a droplet carrying primers and PCR reagents using a droplet-merge device followed by thermocycling to identify colonies carrying sequences of interest.

    3) Plasmid isolation by droplet sorting. PCR-positive drops become fluorescent either by TaqMan assay or SYBR Green staining and are sorted out using a droplet sorter device.

    4) Sequencing of isolated plasmids. The DNA is recovered from sorted droplets by breaking emulsion, and sequence information is obtained by NGS. MAPLE enables efficient enrichment of the target genome, facilitating deep sequencing coverage and reassembly of the target gene cluster, and promoting the discovery of functional-related genes and biosynthetic pathways from a highly diverse metagenomic sample.

  • Single-cell whole-genome sequencing

  • Metagenomics has introduced the power of genomic analysis to entire communities of microbes to depict the structure and potential metabolism pathway of a microbial community with high resolution. Metagenomics allows the study of all of the genomes in a community without the isolation and cultivation steps. However, difficulties in sequence assembly and function annotation make it difficult to link species to their functions. As a complementary technique, single-cell genome sequencing allows the identification of metabolic features of individual species and enables the de-convolution of genetic heterogeneity in diverse cell populations (Woyke et al. 2017). In general, single-cell sequencing includes three basic steps: 1) Single-cell isolation by micromanipulation (Chiou et al. 2005), flow cytometry, (Rinke et al. 2014) or microfluidics (Marcy et al. 2007b); 2) Whole-genome amplification (WGA); and 3) NGS and bioinformatic analysis of single-cells genomes.

    Flow cytometry enables high-throughput single-cell sorting with multiple dimensions and high flexibility. It has been coupled with multiple displacement amplification (MDA) for routine single-cell sequencing of microorganisms (Rinke et al. 2013). We recently reported an improved single-cell MDA pipeline using the interfacial nanoinjection (INJ) technology coupled with fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Fig. 9) (Yun et al. 2019). FACS sorted single cells from deep-sea microbial samples were inserted into each well of a 96-well plate and the INJ was used to add nanoliter droplets of MDA reagents with high precision for single-cell WGA. By real-time monitoring of single-cell MDA reaction, early positive reactions were selected for NGS and phylogenetic identification. This presented good coverage of the genomes with significantly lower contamination levels compared to single-cell amplification in large volumes. Using deep-sea sediment samples from the Southwest Indian Ocean, the INJ-FACS pipeline identified a large number of carbohydrate-active enzymes (CAZymes) in all single-cell genome assemblies, indicating their role in carbon cycling in deep oceans (Yun et al. 2019).

    Figure 9.  Single-cell whole-genome amplification and sequencing using fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) coupled with interfacial nanoinjection (INJ) technique

    The droplet microfluidic device allows single-cell sequencing to be performed at much higher throughput. For example, Hosokawa et al. (2017) introduced a single droplet multiple displacement amplification (sd-MDA) method, which enabled massive simultaneous amplification of single-cell genomes while maintaining sequence accuracy and specificity. A massive parallel single-cell genomic sequencing (SiC-seq) workflow was developed by adding barcodes to all fragments in droplets (Lan et al. 2017), which includes the following steps (Fig. 10).

    Figure 10.  Microfluidic and biochemical workflow to generate a single-cell genomic sequencing (SiC-seq) library. a Generating barcode droplets by encapsulating random DNA oligos at limiting dilution and amplification by in-droplet PCR (SYBR-stained for visualization). b Cells are encapsulated at limiting dilution with molten agarose to generate agarose microgels, each contains a single cell. c The single-cell genomes are purified through a series of bulk enzymatic and detergent lysis steps. d Microgels are re-encapsulated in droplets containing tagmentation reagents. e The droplets containing tagmented genomes are merged sequentially with PCR reagents and barcode droplets at a 1:1 ratio, followed by PCR to splice barcodes to genomic fragments (Reprinted with permission from Lan et al. 2017. Nat Biotechnol 35: 640–646. Copyright (2017) Springer Nature)

    1) Single-cell isolation: Single cells are encapsulated in agarose droplets using a two-stream co-flow droplet maker device, which merges a cell suspension stream with a molten agarose stream. After cooling to solidify the agarose microgel beads, the beads are transferred from oil to aqueous carrier phase.

    2) Single-cell lysis: The microgel beads are incubated in a mixture of lytic enzymes overnight, and then in a mixture of detergents and proteases for 30 min to digest the cell wall, lipids, and proteins, preserving only genomic DNA.

    3) Fragmentation of the genomic DNA: The microgel beads are re-encapsulated in the Nextera reaction in separate droplets, and the genomic DNA in the beads is fragmented by transposases with PCR handles added.

    4) Droplet barcoding: Using a droplet merging device, each microgel-containing droplet is fused with droplets containing PCR reagents and a barcode droplet; the sample is then thermal-cycled, introducing the cell-specific barcode and sequencing adaptor sequences onto the genomic fragments through the PCR handles.

    5) NGS: Droplets are demulsified to pool all the barcoded DNA for sequencing, and the sequencing reads are filtered and grouped by barcode, providing single-cell genomic sequence data. The SiC-seq method yields ~ 50, 000 cells by sequencing a synthetic microbe community and is used to study the distributions of antibiotic resistance genes, virulence factors, and phage sequences from environmental samples. This shows the microbial genetic heterogeneity at the population level. Through a combination of targeted sequencing, single-cell sequencing, and metagenomics, we can expect our understanding of microbial diversity and their ecological and environmental roles to be greatly expended (Xu and Zhao 2018).

Challenges and opportunities
  • In this review, we describe the crucial functional blocks for building droplet microfluidic systems for microbial cultivation, screening, and sequencing. With the advantages of miniaturization, single-cell, high-throughput, low cost, high resolution, and automation, the droplet-based microfluidic systems show great promise in dissecting uncultured microbes, exploiting microbial resources and functional genes and other microbial studies in the ocean and other environments.

  • Challenge of droplet application

  • Further studies and development of droplet microfluidic systems are still needed as two major challenges remain: One is the wide adoption of droplet-based technique by microbiologists and the other is the technical innovation of droplet devices for more practical use.

    The first challenge is the adoption of droplet microfluidics in microbiology. Only a few droplet microfluidic devices are commercially available with specific usages, such as droplet generators from Dolomite (Royston, UK), droplet-based digital PCR from Bio-Rad (Hercules, CA) and the droplet-based single-cell sequencing platforms from 10X Genomics (Pleasanton, CA) and Mission Bio (San Francisco, CA). However, most published works rely on custom-made devices and follow poor-standardized protocols by scientists in the field of microfluidics. Thus, many newly developed devices have not been used with environmental samples and lack subsequent studies and practical applications in microbiology. For instance, many droplet-based devices have been designed for microbial cultivation, but these devices are rarely devoted to the discovery of microbial 'dark matter'. The development of commercially available microfluidic devices and related services is needed to make more microfluidic techniques commercially accessible.

    The second challenge is related to the technical innovation of droplet microfluidics for practical use. The current droplet techniques still require many improvements for more effective applications in microbiology and for efficient uptake, microfluidic experts need to work closely with microbiologists. Surfactants are crucial for droplet stabilization but currently available surfactants with good biocompatibility, stability, and low molecular exchange are rare. Thus, it is important to develop more high-performance surfactants. Polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) and glass are the two of the most commonly used materials for microfluidic chip fabrication, but both of these are difficult to commercialize because of complex chip fabrication and high costs. Current commercial materials have challenges with complex droplet manipulation. Thus, it is important to develop novel materials for microfluidic chip fabrication. Current techniques for droplet detection have difficulties in single-cell detection of bacteria. Most analyses are after cell growth. Developing new detection strategies or techniques for bacterial single-cell analysis and identification in droplets is urgent for high-throughput isolating uncultured microbes in the environment.

  • Opportunities for droplet microfluidics in marine microbiological research

  • Oceans cover over the two-thirds surface of the earth's surface and marine environments provide abundant niches for microbes, including the oxygen minimum zone, hydrothermal vents, cold seeps, and deep ocean, etc. Vast numbers of microbes inhabit the oceans, and these microbes play an important role in biogeochemical cycles (Falkowski et al. 1998). Marine microbes are also an important source of bioactive substances and enzymes. However, only a small part of this microbial diversity can be cultivated and systematically studied, which seriously hinders our understanding of these microbes (Lok 2015).

    Droplet microfluidics is a promising technology for single-cell biology. It holds enormous opportunities for marine microbiological studies. The first priority is to obtain axenic cultures of uncultured marine microbes. Culturomics is a newly developed strategy to cultivate uncultured microorganisms, in which various culture conditions are used to increase the cultivability and identification of microbes (Lagier et al. 2016). However, extensive labor is involved in the current culturomics strategies with standard agar plate cultivation. It takes a long time for slow-growing microbes to form visible colonies on agar plates and the growth of some microbes may in fact be inhibited by the agar (Davis et al. 2011; Tanaka et al. 2014). High-throughput, automation, and miniaturization are the advantages for the droplet-based cultivation technique. Combining the droplet technique and culturomics to automatically cultivate uncultured microbes with high throughput would be a promising strategy to investigate the microbial 'dark matter'. Furthermore, with the help of droplet microfluidics, large-scale microbial single-cell DNA and RNA sequencing will provide valuable information for the study of uncultured microbes (Blattman et al. 2020; Lan et al. 2017). Developing ultra-high-throughput single-cell RNA sequencing platforms for microbes with microfluidic droplets will reduce the cost of this technique and accelerate its application in marine microbiological research.

    Second, marine microbes grow in a variety of extreme environments, such as low temperature, low nutrition, and high pressure, and many distinctive microbial enzymes or bio-active natural products are produced by these microbes (Habbu et al. 2016; Zhang and Kim 2010). Traditional methods to screen these natural products are time-consuming and laborious (Xiao et al. 2015). The droplet-based technique has great potential in discovering novel natural products and enzymes. Developing function-targeted fluorescent labels for Fluorescence-activated droplet sorting (FADS) or integrating other label-free detection techniques such as Raman spectroscopy and mass spectrometry could promote the screening of functional marine microbes.

    In summary, many successful applications in microbiology have been demonstrated with the advancement of droplet microfluidics. More technical innovations and commercialization efforts are needed to revolutionize the traditional methods and workflows of microbiological research. We suspect that droplet microfluidics will become a versatile and powerful tool for microbiologists to explore the most attractive challenges in the future.

Acknowledgements
  • This work was financially supported by National Key Research and Development Program of China (2018YFC0310703), China Ocean Mineral Resources R&D Association (DY135-B-02), National Natural Science Foundation of China (91951103, 91951105, 21822408, 31970091), Key Program of Frontier Sciences of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (QYZDB-SSWSMC008), and Center for Ocean Mega-Science, Chinese Academy of Sciences (KEXUE2019GZ05).

Author contributions
  • WD, LH and XD provided the idea of this review; BH, PX and WD wrote this manuscript; WD, LM, LH, XD, and DC revised this manuscript. BH, WD and PX drew and collected fgures and tables. The fnal manuscript was approved by all of the authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

    Conflict of interest

  • The authors declare there is no confict of interest between them.

  • Animal and human rights statement

  • This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by the authors.

Reference (129)

Catalog

/

DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
Return
Return