
Citation: | Weiwei Liu, Mann Kyoon Shin, Zhenzhen Yi, Yehui Tan. 2021: Progress in studies on the diversity and distribution of planktonic ciliates (Protista, Ciliophora) in the South China Sea. Marine Life Science & Technology, 3(1): 28-43. DOI: 10.1007/s42995-020-00070-y |
Planktonic ciliates are common members of microplankton communities, ranging in size from ten to hundreds of micrometres; they are morphologically diverse and usually dominate the microzooplankton community with abundances of tens of thousands per litre (Lynn 2008). In marine food webs, they play a major role by grazing on pico- and nanoplankton while serving as prey for metazoans. Thus, they act as mediators of energy flow (Azam and Malfatti 2007), with 5-60% of primary production gazed by planktonic ciliates and transferred to higher trophic levels (e.g., Montagnes et al. 2010) and inorganic nutrients supplied to biogeochemical recycling (e.g., Dolan 1997). Also, they contribute significantly to heterotrophic biomass and production in the marine ecosystems due to their high growth rates (McManus and Santoferrara 2013; Pierce and Turner 1992).
Many studies on the diversity and spatial patterns of marine planktonic ciliates have been conducted around the world. For instance, studies have focused on European waters, such as the Baltic (e.g., Mironova et al. 2009) and the Mediterranean Seas (e.g., Bachy et al. 2014; Dolan 2000; Pitta and Giannakourou 2000); waters of North America, in particular the New England Shelf (e.g., Grattepanche et al. 2015; Santoferrara et al. 2014); and across the Southwestern Atlantic Shelf (e.g., Thompson and Alder 2005; Thompson et al. 2001). In addition, some investigations of biogeography at an oceanic scale have been conducted in Atlantic (e.g., Rychert et al. 2014), Pacific (e.g., Gómez 2007; Sohrin et al. 2010) and Indian Oceans (e.g., Zhang et al. 2017). Moreover, the global diversity patterns of ciliates have been studied during the Tara Oceans Voyage (Gimmler et al. 2016). In contrast to studies that examine spatial diversity, ones that focus on the taxonomy of this group have primarily been conducted along the coasts of Europe and China (e.g., Agatha 2011; Song et al. 2009). More recently, molecular methods have been applied to studies of planktonic ciliates. For example, DNA fingerprinting (DGGE) has revealed that the ciliates communities are variable onshore but are more constant in open waters of the Northeast American Shelf (Grattepanche et al. 2016), high-throughput sequencing (HTS) has revealed high spatial variation of ciliates in a tropical estuary (Sun et al. 2017), and DNA barcoding has been used to examine global and local biogeographic patterns of tintinnids (Santoferrara et al. 2018). Despite all of these efforts, we still lack an understanding of several fundamental aspects associated with the diversity and spatial patterns of planktonic ciliates, and the local and global environmental factors governing these remain unresolved (Agatha 2011; Fenchel and Finlay 2004; Fenchel et al. 1997; Foissner et al. 2008). The South China Sea (SCS) may be a useful location to explore these issues.
The SCS is the largest semi-enclosed basin in the western Pacific Ocean with an area of ~ 3.3 million km2 (Su 2004) and hosts various physical-chemical environments and a diversity of microplankton (Li et al. 2012; Song et al. 2012). Studies on ciliates of the SCS were initiated in 1947 when some costal planktonic ciliates were described morphologically (Nie and Cheng 1947). No further studies were performed until the 1990s when two investigations on marine biodiversity, including ciliates, were conducted in the southern SCS (Xu et al. 1994, 1996). Since 2007, studies on the diversity and distribution of ciliates in the SCS have increased, leading to 55 related papers (Fig. 1a). Among these studies, new ciliates species have been described based on morphological and molecular methods (Liu et al. 2009, 2011b, c, 2012, 2013b, 2015b, c, 2016c, 2019; Shen 2018; Song et al. 2013, 2015a, b, 2018a, b, 2019; Wang et al. 2018b; Xu and Bai 1998b), the temporal and spatial dynamics of ciliate communities have been analysed (Feng et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2010a, 2016a; Tan et al. 2010; Xu et al. 1998a; Yu et al. 2014a, c), and relationships between ciliates and their environment have been examined (Su et al. 2007, 2008; Wang et al. 2013, 2014; Wu et al. 2016a, 2017a). Most of the studies have focused on subdivisional districts of the SCS. For example, the taxonomic studies are mostly limited to waters covering the intertidal zone, and those on community characters of ciliate have been mostly carried out in the neritic and oceanic waters (Fig. 1b). This uneven distribution of studies prevents our overall understanding on the diversity and distribution of ciliates, highlighting the necessity to consider the SCS as a whole.
Here, to improve our overall knowledge and understanding of ciliates in the SCS, we summarize recent progress on the diversity and distribution of planktonic ciliates. Considering the wide distribution of studies, we reviewed them based on three geographical regions: the intertidal zone (waters covering the area between the low and high tides), the neritic zone (beyond the intertidal zone and above the continental shelf), and the oceanic zone (from the shelf break to the deep sea). It should be clarified that in this review, the results from previous studies are mostly based on morphological identification. The few studies applying molecular methods are treated independently, recognising that in the future, this approach should be pursued.
Over the last 10 years, studies on the diversity of planktonic ciliates in the intertidal water of northern SCS have mainly focused on their taxonomy (Table 1). It should be noted that, apparently for pragmatic reasons, samples were collected from waters overlying the intertidal zone. However, planktonic ciliates isolated from these waters undoubtedly also occur in neritic and possibly oceanic waters (see below). Therefore, it should not be assumed that the ciliates are endemic to the waters covering the intertidal zone, and we do not discuss the distribution of endemic intertidal species here, although the extent to which they occur might be an avenue for further investigation.
No. | Longitude and latitude | Year of sampling | Month of sampling | Number of species | Number of new reports | Location | Habitat | References |
1 | 110.03° E, 20.003° N | 2017 | Oct | 1 | 0 | Haikou | Reef | Bai et al.(2019) |
2 | – | 2006–2016 | – | 10 | 0 | Zhanjiang/Guangzhou/Shenzhen/Huizhou/Hong Kong | Wetland/Estuary/Mariculture/Beach/Reef/Dock/Harbour | Liu et al.(2019) |
3 | 110.40° E, 21.20° N/110.41° E, 21.37° N | 2012/2013 | Nov/Oct | 2 | 2 | Zhanjiang | Harbour/Mangrove | Song et al.(2019) |
4 | – | 2003–2010 | – | 10 | 0 | Zhanjiang/Daya Bay | Beach/Mariculture | Ma et al.(2019) |
5 | 114.27° E, 22.27° N | 2014 | Dec | 1 | 1 | Hong Kong | Dock | Shen et al.(2018) |
6 | 109.5° E, 18.23° N/110.6° E, 20.01° N/110.55° E, 21.23° N/113.98° E, 22.5° N | 2013/2014/2018 | Apr/Jun/Nov | 3 | 1 | Zhuhai/Sanya/Zhanjiang/Haikou | Estuary/Harbour/Wetland | Song et al.(2018b) |
7 | 113.98° E, 22.5° N/110.55° E, 20.1° N/110.60° E, 21.23° N | 2014/2014/2013 | May/Apr/Oct | 3 | 2 | Zhuhai/Haikou/Zhanjiang | Estuary/Wetland/– | Song et al.(2018a) |
8 | 110.4° E, 21.37° N | 2013 | Oct | 1 | 1 | Zhanjiang | Mangrove | Wang et al.(2018b) |
9 | 110.4° E, 21.2° N | 2009/2010/2010 | Dec/Mar/Mar | 3 | 2 | Zhanjiang | Harbour | Liu et al.(2016c) |
10 | 114.9° E, 22.7° N/110.7° E, 21.6° N | 2009/2010 | May/Mar | 2 | 2 | Daya Bay/Zhanjiang | Littoral zone/Mangrove | Liu et al.(2015b) |
11 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N/113.67° E, 22.67° N/114.53° E, 22.71° N | 2008/2009/2009 | Apr/Apr/May | 3 | 3 | Shenzhen/Guangzhou/Daya Bay | Mangrove/Mariculture/– | Liu et al.(2015c) |
12 | 110.43° E, 21.15° N/110.31° E, 21.1° N | 2010/2013 | Mar/Nov | 2 | 1 | Zhanjiang | Mangrove | Song et al.(2015a) |
13 | 113.61° E, 22.75° N/110.41° E, 21.38° N/110.4° E, 21.2° N | 2013/2013/2013 | May/Oct/Nov | 3 | 3 | Guangzhou/Zhanjiang/Zhanjiang | Estuary/Mangrove/- | Song et al.(2015b) |
14 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N/109.43° E, 21.37° N/109.75° E, 21.51° N | 2007/2010/2010 | Nov/Mar/Mar | 3 | 3 | Daya Bay/Zhanjiang/Zhanjiang | Dock/Mangrove/Mangrove | Liu et al.(2013b) |
15 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N/114.07° E, 22.61° N | 2007/2008 | Aug/Apr | 2 | 0 | Daya Bay/Shenzhen | –/Mangrove | Song et al.(2013) |
16 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N | 2008 | Dec | 1 | 0 | Shenzhen | – | Jiang et al.(2012) |
17 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N/113.91° E, 22.49° N/114.53° E, 22.71° N | 2007/2008/2007 | Apr/Dec/Nov | 3 | 2 | Daya Bay/Shenzhen/Daya Bay | –/Harbour/– | Liu et al.(2012) |
18 | – | 2008 | Nov–Dec | 16 | 0 | Daya Bay | – | Zhang et al.(2012) |
19 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N | 2007 | Dec | 1 | 1 | Daya Bay | Harbour | Liu et al.(2011b) |
20 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N/114.54° E, 22.71° N | 2008/2008 | Apr/Mar | 3 | 1 | Shenzhen/Daya Bay | Mangrove/- | Liu et al.(2011c) |
21 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N | 2008 | Jan/Mar | 2 | 2 | Shenzhen | Mangrove | Liu et al.(2009) |
22 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | Daya Bay | – | Xu et al.(1998b) |
23 | – | 1933/1934 | – | 51 | 10 | Hainan Island | – | Nie and Cheng (1947) |
— data not available |
From these intertidal waters, 71 species belonging to 24 genera, 12 families, and four orders have been identified (Fig. 2) (Hu et al. 2019). In most of these studies, ciliates morphologies were reported from live and protargol stained specimens, and their phylogenies were analysed based on the SSU rDNA sequences. Moreover, 29 species were recognized as new, based on which new higher-level taxa were established (four genera, one family, and one order) (Liu et al. 2019). Similar taxonomic studies have been conducted in the Bohai and Yellow Seas (Bai et al. 2020b; Song et al. 2009), where 51 species have been found (unpublished data of the authors). The higher species richness of planktonic ciliates in SCS compared with Bohai and Yellow Seas supports the suggestion that the SCS is a diversity hotspot for ciliates (Hu et al. 2019; Jiang et al. 2012; Ma et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2012). Song et al.(2009) predicted there are 2000 ciliate species in all marine water. However, recent estimation indicated that 83-89% of ciliates are undescribed (Agatha 2011). The high proportion (41%) of new species relative to the total species richness in SCS suggests that there are many unknown species in this area.
Liu et al.(2019) summarized the results of several diversity and faunal studies on planktonic ciliate in typical habitats of the intertidal zone of northern SCS and found that the order Oligotrichida represents the most abundant taxon, with the highest species richness, and is widely distributed in all habitats. The family Strombidiidae and the genus Strombidium comprise the highest proportion of all planktonic ciliate at family and genus levels, respectively. Similarly, these taxa are also found to dominate the ciliates community in other areas, such as the Yellow Sea, Northwest and South Atlantic Ocean, Baltic Sea, and Mediterranean Sea (Agatha 2011; Dolan and Marrasé 1995; Mironova et al. 2009; Santoferrara and Alder 2009; Song et al. 2009). Given that the family Strombidiidae possesses the highest species number of the planktonic ciliates, its high species richness in these studies is easily explained. Finally, the diversity of planktonic ciliates in five typical intertidal habitats of the northern SCS (mangrove, estuary, mariculture, beach, docks) was compared, indicating that mangrove wetland, with their high environmental heterogeneity, supported the highest species richness (Liu et al. 2019).
In the SCS, the neritic waters are widely impacted by various coastal processes, such as riverine plumes, upwelling, and human activity (Su 2004). These processes play important roles in controlling the distribution of ciliate and are patchily distributed in neritic waters. Therefore, the ciliate communities also show spatial variation (Li et al. 2019; Tan et al. 2010; Wu et al. 2016a).
Several studies on the spatial variations of ciliates in the SCS neritic waters were conducted in typical bays and estuaries along the south coast of China (Fig. 3a; Table 2). Tan et al.(2010) investigated the ciliates community in Sanya Bay and identified 58 species in 33 genera. They found that a high abundance of ciliates generally appeared in the estuary and associated coastal areas (Fig. 3f). Their results showed the area near coral reefs displayed a low abundance of planktonic ciliates, which was thought to be attributed to the high feeding rate of coral on ciliates (Ferrier et al. 1998). The distributions of ciliates in different aquaculture environments in Nan'ao were compared by Wu et al.(2016a, 2019). The results revealed that the species number and abundance were higher in an oyster-seaweed mixed culture area and non-aquaculture area, and lower in a caged fish culture area (Fig. 3d). Because the water exchange was weak and light transmission was low in the caged fish culture area, the growth of phytoplankton was limited, which apparently led to low ciliate abundance (Wu et al. 2016a). Wu et al.(2016b, 2017b) examined the distributional variation of ciliates in four areas of Daya Bay, and found that the species number was at a maximum at an artificial reef and at a minimum in an aquaculture area, but the abundance at the aquaculture area was significantly higher than three other areas (Fig. 3g). Their results also indicated that species diversity, evenness, and richness were higher in samples from less polluted areas (Fig. 3g), supporting the feasibility of using ciliates as marine environmental indicators (Wu et al. 2016b). The distributions of tintinnid ciliates along Pearl River Estuary were studied by Li et al.(2019), and ~ 43 species in 15 genera were found, in which freshwater, brackish, and marine species occurred in sequence along the salinity gradient. Their results revealed that peak abundance occurred at mesohaline and polyhaline regions (Fig. 3c), while species richness was lowest at oligohaline regions and highest at polyhaline regions (Li et al. 2019).
No. | Longitude (°E) | Latidute (°N) | Year of sampling | Month of sampling | Number of sites | Number of species | Groups | Area | Habitat | References |
1 | 108.25–109.88 | 20.1–21.47 | 2011 | Apr | 19 | 36 | All ciliates | Beibu Gulf | Oceanic | Wang et al. (2013) |
2 | 108.25–109.88 | 20.1–21.47 | 2011 | Aug | 21 | 101 | All ciliates | Beibu Gulf | Oceanic | Wang et al. (2014) |
3 | 109.4–110.0 | 21.2–21.6 | 2010 | Apr/Aug | 8 | 8/13 | Tintinnids | Tieshan Harbour | Neritic | Yu et al. (2014a) |
4 | 110–120 | 18–23.25 | 2007 | Aug | 36 | 44 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2010b) |
5 | 113.5–118 | 18–23.5 | 2007 | Aug | 13 | 38 | All ciliates | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2010a) |
6 | 116.6–117.2 | 23–23.6 | 2007 | Apr/Nov | 5 | 14 | Tintinnids | Shantou coast | Neritic | Liu et al. (2011a) |
7 | 111–115.4 | 6.9–11 | 2011 | Aug | 11 | 30 | All ciliates | Southern SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2016b) |
8 | 108.45–108.62 | 21.72–21.88 | 2012 | Jan/Apr | 16 | 18/21 | All ciliates | Maowei Sea | Neritic | Liu et al. (2016a) |
9 | 108.45–108.62 | 21.72–21.88 | 2011 | Dec | 16 | 19 | All ciliates | Maowei Sea | Neritic | Liu et al. (2015a) |
10 | 109.5–113.5 | 5–19.5 | 2010 | May | 14 | 22 | All ciliates | SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2013a) |
11 | 114.25–116.77 | 18.9–20.97 | 2015 | Nov | 16 | 53 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Wang et al.(2018a, b) |
12 | 113.4–114.2 | 21.6–23.2 | 2014/2015/2017 | Oct/Oct/Jun/Jun/Mar/Apr | 19/41/36/26/29/35 | 30/26/16/16/19/22 | Tintinnids | Pearl River Estuary | Neritic | Li et al. (2019) |
13 | 111–117 | 18.5–22 | 2009 | Jan/Apr | 18 | −/22 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Yu et al. (2014b) |
14 | 109.48–113.23 | 17.43–21.43 | 2007 | Dec | 82 | 49 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Zhang et al. (2010) |
15 | 107.25–109.75 | 18.75–21.35 | 2009 | Aug | 12 | 20 | Tintinnids | Beibu Gulf | Oceanic | Yu et al. (2014c) |
16 | 109.48–113.23 | 17.43–21.43 | 2007 | Oct | 82 | 22 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Feng et al. (2010) |
17 | 117.06–117.1 | 23.45–23.48 | 2014 | Apr/Aug | 13 | 19/28 | All ciliates | Shen'ou Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2019) |
18 | 114.5–114.8 | 22.5–22.7 | 2014 | Jan/Apr/Aug/Nov | 12 | 41 | All ciliates | Daya Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2016b) |
19 | 114.5–114.83 | 22.5–22.83 | 2014 | Jan/Apr/Aug/Nov | 6 | 11/21/14/13 | All ciliates | Dapeng Cove | Neritic | Wu et al. (2017a) |
20 | 114.5–114.83 | 22.5–22.83 | 1997 | Apr | 20 | 9–29 | All ciliates | Dapeng Cove | Neritic | Xu et al.(1998a, b) |
21 | 117.06–117.1 | 23.45–23.5 | 2014 | Apr | 13 | 19 | All ciliates | Baisha Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2016a) |
22 | 109.3–116.5 | 5.4–11.6 | 2013 | Nov | 18 | 17 | All ciliates | Southern SCS | Oceanic | Wu et al. (2016c) |
23 | 112–118.5 | 8.5–15 | 2016 | Oct | 10 | 20 | All ciliates | Central SCS | Oceanic | Xie et al. (2018) |
24 | 109.33–109.5 | 18.18–18.3 | 2004 | Aug | 12 | 58 | All ciliates | Sanya Bay | Neritic | Tan et al. (2010) |
25 | 110.5–120 | 14–22.25 | 2004 | Sep | 5 | 17 | All ciliates | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Su et al. (2007) |
26 | 116.75–117.9 | 21.7–22.75 | 2013/2014 | Apr/Jun/Apr/Jul | 5 | 79 | All ciliates | Northeastern SCS | Oceanic | Sun et al. (2019) |
27 | 109.33–109.5 | 18.2–18.25 | 2006 | Apr | 6 | 102 | All ciliates | Sanya Bay | Neritic | Su et al. (2008) |
28 | 108–118 | 4.0–12.0 | 1993/1994 | May/Apr | 44 | – | All ciliates | Nansha Islands | Oceanic | Xu et al. (1994) |
29 | 108–118 | 4.0–12.0 | 1994 | Sep | 40 | 75 | All ciliates | Nansha Islands | Oceanic | Xu et al. (1996) |
30 | 114.5–114.8 | 22.5–22.7 | 2014 | Jan/Apr/Aug/Nov | 12 | 41 | All ciliates | Daya Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2017b) |
31 | 109.45 | 18.02 | 2014 | Apr | 1 | 79OTU | All ciliates | Sanya Bay | Neritic | Wang et al. (2017) |
32 | – | – | 2006–2018 | – | – | 71 | All ciliates | Coastal area of Guangdong | Intertidal | Hu et al. (2019) |
33 | – | – | 2015 | – | 5 | 60OTU | All ciliates | Coastal area of Guangdong | Intertidal | Lu et al. (2020) |
— data not available |
In the SCS neritic zone, environmental (e.g., temperature light) and physical (e.g., river runoff, currents) factors displayed seasonal dynamics, which elsewhere can influence ciliate communities and lead to a seasonal patterns (e.g., Bojanić et al. 2005; Sun et al. 2017). In Daya Bay, the number of ciliate species in the summer was higher than in other seasons, while the highest abundance occurred in spring (Wu et al. 2017a). Moreover, a clear seasonal shift of the taxonomic composition was revealed in this study, i.e., the dominant taxa were oligotrichids in spring but changed to tintinnids in the other three seasons (Wu et al. 2017a) (Fig. 3g). In the Tieshan Harbour, Yu et al.(2014a) found that the ciliate species number, abundance, diversity, and evenness in the summer were higher than in the spring. In the Maowei Bay, the ciliate community also exhibited temporal fluctuations, with higher total abundance and species number in the wet season than in the dry season (Fig. 3b), which was thought to be associated with the seasonal variations of phytoplankton abundance (Liu et al. 2016a). In the Shantou coastal area, tintinnid diversity was higher but their abundance was lower in the fall compared to the spring (Fig. 3h); this was considered to be a response to the seasonal variation of salinity and temperature impacted by river runoff and upwelling (Liu et al. 2011a). Consistent with findings in other seas (e.g., Bojanić et al. 2005; Johansson et al. 2004; Mironova et al. 2012; Urrutxurtu 2004), the high abundance of ciliates usually occurred in summer or wet season in SCS. These high abundances may be explained by the typically warm water temperatures and high Chl-a levels during the summer, i.e., in general, there is often a positive correlation between temperature, Chl-a and ciliates abundance (e.g., Sun et al. 2017; Urrutxurtu 2004).
In oceanic areas of the SCS, a range of mesoscale physical processes occur, such as monsoons, upwelling, and eddies (Chen et al. 2011; Jing et al. 2008; Su 2004). These processes give rise to variation in environmental characters across spatial domains and influence the distributions of planktonic ciliates (Liu et al. 2010a; Wang et al. 2014; Zhang et al. 2010).
Many studies on the distributions of ciliates have been conducted in the oceanic areas of northern SCS (Fig. 4a; Table 2). Wang et al.(2013, 2014) investigated the ciliate community in the Beibu Gulf, where 36 and 101 species were found in the spring and the summer, respectively. The horizontal distribution patterns showed that abundance and richness were generally high in the areas near the coast (Fig. 4b) (Wang et al. 2014). They also found that the main driver of this pattern was a south-westerly wind, which strengthened the intrusion of water from the south, caused the mixture of water in northern area, and thus produced a high concentration of nutrients and Chl-a as the food for ciliates (Wang et al. 2014). Tintinnid ciliates were investigated in the eastern SCS off Hainan and Leizhou, where 49 and 22 species were found, respectively (Feng et al. 2010; Zhang et al. 2010). Additionally, these studies revealed that the abundance and biomass of tintinnids decreased from nearshore to offshore (Fig. 4c). In the north-eastern SCS, 44 tintinnids were recorded (Liu et al. 2010b). Similar to the findings in eastern SCS off Hainan and Leizhou, the abundance and richness of tintinnids in the north-eastern SCS also displayed a decreasing trend from nearshore to offshore. These findings are consistent with some studies in other seas of the world. For example, mean abundance of ciliates decreased twofold from the shelf-slope to oceanic waters in south-western Atlantic (Santoferrara and Alder 2009), and alpha diversity of planktonic ciliates decreased with increasing distance from shore in New England shelf (Doherty et al. 2010). In nearshore areas, upwelling is common and will introduce nutrients, generating high phytoplankton biomass that may act as food for ciliates, resulting in the high abundance and richness closer to the coast (Wang et al. 2014).
Compared with the extensive studies in the northern SCS above, investigations of ciliates in the central and southern SCS are less common. Xie et al.(2018) identified 20 planktonic ciliates species in the central SCS, and found that the tintinnids were richest in terms of species number, while the aloricate ciliates dominated the community in terms of abundance (Fig. 4e). In the southern SCS, 30 and 17 ciliate species were recorded by Liu et al.(2016b) and Wu et al.(2016c), respectively. Similar to that in the central area, the species richness of tintinnids was distinctively higher than that of aloricated species, in both studies. These findings differ from most studies in other seas, where aloricates usually represented most of the ciliates species (Gimmler et al. 2016; Mironova et al. 2009; Pitta and Giannakourou 2000). Given that the central and southern SCS are located in a tropical, oligotrophic area (Su 2004), the particular hydrological environment may shape unique planktonic ciliate communities there. In terms of spatial distribution, ciliates abundance was patchy in the southern SCS (Fig. 4d, h), where nutrient levels and Chl-a concentration were considered as the most important factors affecting the spatial pattern of ciliates (Wu et al. 2016c). On a larger scale, the distribution of ciliates along a latitudinal gradient in the SCS was examined by Liu et al.(2013a), who identified 22 ciliates, and found that abundance and species richness increased from the equator to 16° N (Fig. 4f). This observation agrees with the general latitudinal trends that both abundance and species richness increase away from the equator, reaching a peak at ~ 15-20° (Dolan and Pierce 2013; Rychert et al. 2014).
The oceanic waters of the SCS present remarkable biochemical and physical depth-gradients, to a maximum depth of > 5000 m (Shaw and Chao 1994). These provide a structured environment and generate different ecological layers, leading to substantial dispersal limitation and environmental selection among layers for ciliates. Sun et al.(2019) found that the mesopelagic zone exhibited comparable alpha diversity to surface waters, with high diversity occurring at the interface with the euphotic zone (Fig. 5e-g). In this study, vertical variations of ciliate composition were mainly present in the relative abundances of the classes Spirotrichea and Oligohymenophorea (Fig. 5h). Moreover, bacterivorous and commensal/parasitic ciliates were considered to be an important component of the food web in the mesopelagic zone, due to their high abundance (Sun et al. 2019). Wang et al.(2018a) explored the vertical distribution of ciliate in the northern SCS slope and found that ciliates abundance displayed a surface peak (Fig. 5a, b). This pattern is similar to the results in the Bay of Fundy (Middlebrook et al. 1987), but different from most findings in other seas where peak abundances appear in the deep chlorophyll maximum (DCM) (Dolan 2000; Sohrin et al. 2010). One possible explanation for this surface peak in the SCS slope is that the DCM might be upwelled to the surface, which commonly happened in slope areas (Wang et al. 2018a). In addition, the seasonal dynamics of the vertical distribution of ciliates were investigated in northern SCS (Yu et al. 2014b). In this study, abundance and biomass usually showed high values in the surface or intermediate layers in the summer, while in the winter, ciliates tended to accumulate in the sub-surface layers (Fig. 5c, d).
Molecular methods, such as high-throughput sequencing (HTS), have been widely used in ecological studies of ciliates in recent decades (Bachy et al. 2013; Grattepanche et al. 2016; Santoferrara et al. 2018; Stock et al. 2013). For ciliates in the SCS, only three studies have applied molecular methods. Using HTS, Lu et al.(2020) examined species diversity in the subclass Oligotrichia in the intertidal zone of five cities of Guangdong, recognising 60 operational taxonomic units (OTUs). In this study, the city of Shenzhen had the highest OTUs and sequences among the five sampling sites (Fig. 6a), and Strombidium was the most abundant and widely distributed genus in this area, as revealed in other studies with morphology methods (Liu et al. 2019). During a one-day time-series study in Sanya Bay, the species diversity and community structure of oligotrich ciliates were analysed using a DNA clone library (Wang et al. 2017). In their results, 79 OTUs were detected, and the species diversity decreased from morning to midday but increased from nightfall to midnight (Fig. 6c). Sun et al.(2019) compared the morphology and HTS methods in their study on the diversity of ciliates in mesopelagic waters of the SCS (Fig. 6d). They found HTS can reveal a more diverse assemblage of ciliates than microscopic examination (575 OTUs vs. 79 morphospecies) (Fig. 6b), but both approaches captured similar vertical distribution patterns of ciliate communities. Additionally, HTS revealed that the species of the classes Spirotrichea and Oligohymenophorea dominated the ciliate communities in their study. This agrees with finding obtained using the same method in the circumglobal Tara Oceans expedition (Gimmler et al. 2016), in which these two classes accounted for 73% of the total ciliate species richness.
It is well known that the distribution of ciliates is affected by the environment (Dolan and Pierce 2013; Jiang et al. 2011). In the SCS, the relationships between the ciliate community and environmental variables have also been investigated. Both biotic (e.g., phytoplankton, bacteria, predators) and abiotic factors (e.g., temperature, salinity, nutrients) have been found to play roles in controlling ciliate communities, with the main drivers varying spatially and temporally (Wu et al. 2016a, 2017a).
Consistent with studies in other locations, such as the Mediterranean Sea (Dolan and Marrase 1995), Southwest Atlantic Ocean (Santoferrara and Alder 2012), and Irish Sea (Montagnes et al. 1999), Chl-a concentration was revealed to have a strong positive relationship with ciliates abundance in the SCS (Feng et al. 2010; Liu et al. 2010a, b; Tan et al. 2010; Yu et al. 2014a). The correlation with Chl-a concentration, on the one hand, indicates the response of ciliates to food availability. On the other hand, it may result from high relative abundance of ciliates containing chloroplasts or endosymbionts, such as Mesodium, which can contribute significantly to the Chl-a (Dierssen et al. 2015; Montagnes et al. 1999). Further studies have investigated the relationships between ciliates and different size fractions of Chl-a in the SCS and have revealed that the ciliate abundance and species number were positively correlated to micro-sized and nano-sized phytoplankton Chl-a concentrations (Liu et al. 2010a, b).
Predators also may play a role in controlling ciliate communities by top-down interactions (Gómez 2007; Sinistro 2010). In Maowei Bay of the SCS, both positive and negative correlations among the dominant groups of mesozooplankton and ciliates were observed, suggesting that the different ciliates were preferred by selected mesozooplankton species and the predation effects of mesozooplankton on ciliates were taxon-specific (Liu et al. 2015a).
Temperature and salinity have been identified as significant physical factors impacting ciliate communities in different ecosystems (Forster et al. 2012; Gimmler et al. 2016; Weisse et al. 2001). In the SCS, ciliate abundances were positively correlated with sea surface temperature in Maowei Bay (Liu et al. 2016a), possibly as growth of ciliates is strongly correlated with temperature (Beaver and Crisman 1990; Mieczan 2008). The effects of salinity on ciliates have been studied in estuaries of the SCS, where ciliate species number and abundance both showed negative relationship with salinity (Liu et al. 2010a; Yu et al. 2014b). This inverse relationships may be explained by that the low-salinity water from river discharge providing more food for ciliates (Liu et al. 2010a; Rakshit et al. 2016; Yu et al. 2014b).
Studies in the SCS have also suggested that the ciliates are affected by nutrients (e.g., NO3-, NO2-, soluble reactive phosphorus). For example, ciliate communities in the northern Beibu Gulf were more closely related to the level of nitrogen (total, nitrate, and nitrite) and phosphorus (total and active), in which nitrogen played a crucial role, followed by phosphorus (Wang et al. 2014). In Tieshan Harbour, total nitrogen was considered as one of the key factors correlated to the tintinnids community (Yu et al. 2014a). The significant effect of nitrite on ciliates was also observed in a global investigation on the correlations between environment and ciliates during the Tara Oceans voyage (Gimmler et al. 2016). The reasons for these associations between nutrients and ciliate are twofold: nutrients can enhance phytoplankton growth and, thus, indirectly influence heterotrophic ciliates that feed on phytoplankton, and nutrients can be directly taken up by autotrophic ciliates (Wang et al. 2014; Wichham et al. 2015).
In addition, the response of different ciliate species to environmental factors was discussed in some studies in the SCS. In Nan'ao, Mesodinium rubrum and Tintinnopsis beroidea, were significantly positively correlated with Chl-a (Wu et al. 2019). Strombidium globosaneum, Tintinnopsis minuta, and Strombidium conicum, showed more sensitivity to dissolved oxygen, pH, and chemical oxygen demand, whereas Tintinnopsis parvula and Tintinnopsis chinglanensis were significantly related to NO2- (Wu et al. 2019). In Daya Bay, some tintinnids were significantly, positively correlated with nutrients, particularly with nitrogenous nutrients, whereas aloricate ciliate species showed more sensitivity to salinity and temperature (Wu et al. 2016b).
These findings, above, indicated that planktonic ciliate can reflect the environmental status, and support the notion that they can be considered as favourable bioindicator of marine water quality, as commonly applied in previous studies (e.g., Jiang et al. 2011; Xu et al. 2008). Moreover, considering the variation in responses of different species to environmental factors, the application of ciliates in environmental assessment should consider their specific indicative roles to each environmental factor at a species level.
Arising from this review are some notable findings on the diversity and distribution of planktonic ciliates in the SCS, as a contribution to our knowledge of ciliates in global marine waters.
1.Similar to the findings in other seas, such as the Yellow Sea, the northwest Atlantic Ocean, the Baltic Sea, and the Mediterranean Sea (Agatha 2011; Mironova et al. 2009; Song et al. 2009), in terms of species richness, the order Oligotrichida dominates planktonic ciliate communities in the SCS. This supports the global dominance of oligotrichs and their typically high richness (Agatha 2011).
2.In neritic waters of the SCS, high diversity and abundance of ciliates usually occurred in the summer or wet season, reflecting seasonal trends in other areas of the world (Bojanić et al. 2005; Johansson et al. 2004; Mironova et al. 2012; Urrutxurtu 2004). These trends may be explained by the significant and positive correlations between temperature, Chl-a, and ciliates abundance (Urrutxurtu 2004).
3.The abundance and diversity of ciliates in the oceanic waters of the SCS display a decreasing trend from onshore to offshore area. This finding is consistent with most studies in other seas of the world (e.g., Doherty et al. 2010; Santoferrara and Alder 2009). Monsoons and upwellings were thought to play a main role in structuring the ciliate community in the oceanic waters (Wang et al. 2014). Moreover, in the central and southern SCS, ciliate abundance displayed a patchy pattern, which may be explained by the patchiness of their prey (Wu et al. 2016c).
4.The mesopelagic zone of the SCS exhibited comparable alpha diversity to surface water. Based on their abundance, bacterivorous and commensal/parasitic ciliates species were identified as an important component of the food web in the mesopelagic zone (Sun et al. 2019). In the northern SCS slope, ciliate abundance displayed a surface peak in vertical direction (Wang et al. 2018a), which differs from most findings in other seas where peak abundances appeared in DCM (Dolan 2000; Sohrin et al. 2010). One possible explanation for this surface peak is that the DCM might upwell to the surface (Wang et al. 2018a).
Although studies on planktonic ciliates in the SCS have increased in the last 20 years, their diversity and distribution remain poorly appreciated, and some gaps exist.
1.There remains a need for taxonomy work. Although many new planktonic ciliate taxa have been reported in the SCS, the species number continues to increase, demonstrating that the diversity of these ciliates is higher than previously supposed (Bai et al. 2020a; Hu et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2017; Song et al. 2018a). Moreover, due to the lack of necessary taxonomy data, such as morphological and molecular markers, for many rare species, an accurate species-level identification cannot be achieved in most community studies. To solve this problem, comprehensive and detailed taxonomy data should be obtained, based on more extensive taxonomy studies. Furthermore, past studies may have misidentified species (due to poor resources for identification), resulting in low reliability when comparing the ciliate communities from different studies. For example, species number and abundance sometimes distinctively differ between studies, even from the same area. Therefore, professional background or training in ciliate taxonomy should be encouraged for researchers to increase the accuracy of results (Agatha 2011; Song et al. 2009).
2.The community coverage of ciliates has been low. Many studies in the SCS have investigated the community of planktonic ciliate by only focusing on several common taxonomic groups (e.g., the loricated tintinnids). However, in terms of abundance and species number, tintinnids account for less than 20% of all ciliates in most waters (e.g., Wang et al. 2013; Yu et al. 2014b; Zhang et al. 2010). To understand ciliate ecology, a more rigorous assessment of their diversity should be included in future studies.
3.The coverage of the SCS is uneven. Most studies have been conducted in the coastal and north SCS, and some have been confined to intertidal zone waters. In contrast, work conducted in centre and south of the SCS is limited. However, the central and southern areas comprise the main part of the SCS and are characterized by the tropical and deep-sea environments, which may play an important role in shaping a unique ciliate community. To provide a comprehensive understanding of the distribution of ciliates in the SCS, more attention could be paid to the central and southern areas.
4.Molecular techniques, such as HTS, transcriptomics, and genomics, have rarely been applied in the SCS (Lu et al. 2020; Sun et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2017). Compared with traditional microscope observation, molecular techniques do not rely on taxonomy knowledge but can provide objective results. Moreover, some studies have indicated that molecular methods can reveal higher diversity of ciliates than morphological identification, as they recognise rare and atypical taxa (Santoferrara and McManus 2017). Therefore, molecular techniques should be used in the future to explore the diversity and distribution of ciliates in the SCS.
5.Although the influences of several factors on ciliates community have been widely examined, most of the studies in the SCS have focused on correlations between abiotic environmental variables and ciliates. Rarely have they estimated the roles of biotic factors in their community structuring. As an intermediate link in energy transfer within the microbial food web, the ciliate community can also be effected by their preys and predators (Li et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2015a). To reveal the driving mechanism of distribution of ciliate in the SCS, studies should be conducted that combine the effects of the abiotic and biotic factors on ciliates.
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangzhou (No. 202002030489), Guangdong MEPP Fund [No. GDOE (2019) A23], Key Special Project for Introduced Talents Team of Southern Marine Science and Engineering Guangdong Laboratory (Guangzhou) (GML2019ZD0405), and Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 32070517, 41576124, 31772440, 31761133001). Many thanks are given to Dr. David Montagnes (University of Liverpool) for his kind suggestions to improve the manuscript.
WWL wrote the manuscript. MKS, ZZY and YHT discussed the results and revised the manuscript. WWL and YHT developed the concept and designed the outline. All authors read and approved the final version of the manuscript.
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Agatha S (2011) Global diversity of aloricate Oligotrichea (Protista Ciliophora Spirotricha) in marine and brackish sea water. PLoS ONE 6:e22466 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022466
|
Azam F, Malfatti F (2007) Microbial structuring of marine ecosystems. Nat Rev Microbiol 5:782-791 doi: 10.1038/nrmicro1747
|
Bachy C, Dolan JR, López-García P, Deschamps P, Moreira D (2013) Accuracy of protist diversity assessments: morphology compared with cloning and direct pyrosequencing of 18S rRNA genes and ITS regions using the conspicuous tintinnid ciliates as a case study. ISME J 7:244-255 doi: 10.1038/ismej.2012.106
|
Bachy C, Moreira D, Dolan JR, López-García P (2014) Seasonal dynamics of free-living tintinnid ciliate communities revealed by environmental sequences from the north-west mediterranean sea. Fems Microbiol Ecol 87:330-342 doi: 10.1111/1574-6941.12224
|
Bai Y, Wang R, Liu WW, Warren A, Zhao Y, Hu XZ (2020a) Redescriptions of three tintinnine ciliates (Ciliophora: Tintinnina) from coastal waters in China based on lorica features, cell morphology and rDNA sequence data. Eur J Protist 72:125659 doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2019.125659
|
Bai Y, Wang R, Song W, Suzuki T, Hu XZ (2020b) Redescriptions of five tintinnine ciliates (Alveolata: Ciliophora: Oligotrichea) from coastal waters of Qingdao, China. Mar Life Sci Technol 2:209-221 doi: 10.1007/s42995-020-00034-2
|
Beaver JR, Crisman TL (1990) Seasonality of planktonic ciliated protozoa in 20 subtropical florida lakes of varying trophic state. Hydrobiologia 190:127-135 doi: 10.1007/BF00014103
|
Bojanić N, Šolić M, Krstulović N, Šestanović S, Marasović I, Ninčević Z (2005) Temporal variability in abundance and biomass of ciliates and copepods in the eutrophicated part of kaštela bay (middle adriatic sea). Helgol Mar Res 59:107-120 doi: 10.1007/s10152-004-0199-x
|
Chen SL, Li Y, Hu JY, Zheng AR, Huang LF, Lin YS (2011) Multiparameter cluster analysis of seasonal variation of water masses in the eastern Beibu Gulf. J Oceanogr 67:709-718 doi: 10.1007/s10872-011-0071-y
|
Dierssen H, Mcmanus GB, Chlus A, Qiu D, Lin S (2015) Space station image captures a red tide ciliate bloom at high spectral and spatial resolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 112:14783-14787 doi: 10.1073/pnas.1512538112
|
Doherty M, Tamura M, Costas BA, Ritchie ME, Mcmanus GB, Katz LA (2010) Ciliate diversity and distribution across an environmental and depth gradient in long island sound, USA. Environ Microbiol 12:886-898 doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920.2009.02133.x
|
Dolan JR (1997) Phosphorus and ammonia excretion by planktonic protists. Mar Geol 139:109-122 doi: 10.1016/S0025-3227(96)00106-5
|
Dolan JR (2000) Tintinnid ciliate diversity in the Mediterranean Sea: longitudinal patterns related to water column structure in late spring-early summer. Aquat Microb Ecol 22:69078 http://www.researchgate.net/publication/215717480_tinitinnid_ciliate_diversity_in_the_mediterranean_sea_longitudinal_patterns_related_to_water_column_structure_in_late_spring-early_summer
|
Dolan JR, Marrasé C (1995) Planktonic ciliate distribution relative to a deep chlorophyll maximum: Catalan Sea, N.W. Mediterranean, June 1993. Deep-Sea Res 42:1965-1987 http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0967063795000925
|
Dolan JR, Pierce R (2013) Diversity and distributions of tintinnids. In: Dolan JR, Montagnes DJS, Agatha S, Coats DW, Stoecker DK (eds) The biology and ecology of tintinnid ciliates: models for marine plankton. Wiley, Oxford, Chichester, pp 214-243 doi: 10.1002/9781118358092.ch10
|
Fenchel T, Finlay BJ (2004) The ubiquity of small species: patterns of local and global diversity. Bioscience 54:777-784 doi: 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0777:TUOSSP]2.0.CO;2
|
Fenchel T, Esteban GF, Finlay BJ (1997) Local versus global diversity of microorganisms: cryptic diversity of ciliated protozoa. Oikos 80:220-225 doi: 10.2307/3546589
|
Feng MP, Zhang WC, Zhang CX, Xiao T, Li CL (2010) Horizontal distribution of large tintinnids in the northern South China Sea. J Trop Ocean 3:141-150 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/301662061_Horizontal_distribution_of_large_tintinnids_in_the_northern_South_China_Sea
|
Ferrier-Pagès C, Allem D, Gattuso P, Jaubert J, Rassoulzadegan F (1998) Microheterotrophy in the zooxanthellate coral stylophora pistillata: effects of light and ciliate density. Limnol Oceanogr 43:1639-1648 doi: 10.4319/lo.1998.43.7.1639
|
Foissner W, Chao A, Katz LA (2008) Diversity and geographic distribution of ciliates (Protista: Ciliophora). Biodivers Conserv 17:345-363 doi: 10.1007/s10531-007-9254-7
|
Forster D, Behnke A, Stoeck T (2012) Meta-analyses of environmental sequence data identify anoxia and salinity as parameters shaping ciliate communities. Syst Biodiver 10:277-288 doi: 10.1080/14772000.2012.706239
|
Gimmler A, Korn R, Vargas CD, Audic S, Stoeck T (2016) The tara oceans voyage reveals global diversity and distribution patterns of marine planktonic ciliates. Sci Rep 6:33555 doi: 10.1038/srep33555
|
Gómez F (2007) Trends on the distribution of ciliates in the open pacific ocean. Acta Oecol 32:188-202 doi: 10.1016/j.actao.2007.04.002
|
Grattepanche J-D, Santoferrara LF, Mcmanus GB, Katz LA (2015) Distinct assemblage of planktonic ciliates dominates both photic and deep waters on the New England shelf. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 526:1-9 doi: 10.3354/meps11256
|
Grattepanche J-D, McManus GB, Katz LA (2016) Patchiness of ciliate communities sampled at varying spatial scales along the New England shelf. PLoS ONE 11:e0167659 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0167659
|
Hu XZ, Lin XF, Song WB (2019) Ciliate atlas: species found in the South China Sea. Science Press, Beijing
|
Jiang Y, Xu HL, Hu XZ, Zhu MZ, Al-Rasheid KAS, Warren A (2011) An approach to analyzing spatial patterns of planktonic ciliate communities for monitoring water quality in Jiaozhou Bay northern China. Mar Pollut Bull 62:227-235 doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.11.008
|
Jiang Y, Yang JP, Al-Farraj S, Warren A, Lin XF (2012) Redescriptions of three tintinnine ciliates Tintinnopsis tocantinensis, T. radix and T. cylindrical (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea) from coastal waters off China. Eur J Protistol 48:314-325 doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2012.02.001
|
Jing ZY, Qi YQ, Hua ZL (2008) Numerical study on summer upwelling over northern continental shelf of South China Sea. J Trop Ocean 27:1-8 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-RDHY200803002.htm
|
Johansson M, Gorokhova E, Larsson U (2004) Annual variability in ciliate community structure potential prey and predators in the open northern Baltic Sea proper. J Plankton Res 26:67-80 doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbg115
|
Li G, Huang LM, Liu HX, Ke ZX, Lin Q, Ni GY, Yin JQ, Li KZ, Song XY, Shen PP, Tan YH (2012) Latitudinal variability (6° S-20° N) of early summer phytoplankton species compositions and size fractioned productivity from Java Sea to South China Sea. Mar Biol Res 8:163-171 doi: 10.1080/17451000.2011.615323
|
Li J, Chen FZ, Liu ZW, Zhao XX, Yang K, Lu WX, Cui K (2016) Bottom-up versus top-down effects on ciliate community composition infour eutrophic lakes (China). Eur J Protistol 53:20-30 doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2015.12.007
|
Li HB, Wang CF, Liang C, Zhao Y, Zhang WC, Gregorie G, Xiao T (2019) Diversity and distribution of tintinnid ciliates along salinity gradient in the Pearl River Estuary in southern China. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 226:106268 doi: 10.1016/j.ecss.2019.106268
|
Liu WW, Xu DP, Lin XF, Li JQ, Gong J, Al-Rasheid KSA, Song WB (2009) Novistrombidium sinicum n. sp. and N. orientale n. sp. (Protozoa: Ciliophora): two new oligotrich ciliates from a mangrove wetland south China. J Eukaryot Microbiol 56:459-465 doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2009.00425.x
|
Liu HX, Tan YH, Huang LM, Song XY, Huang JR, Li T (2010a) Composition and distribution of ciliates in northern South China Sea during summer. Acta Ecol Sin 30:2340-2346 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.researchgate.net/publication/282721822_Composition_and_distribution_of_ciliates_in_northern_South_China_Sea_during_summer
|
Liu HX, Huang LM, Tan YH, Song XY, Huang J, Li T (2010b) Distribution and composition of tintinnids ciliates in the northern South China Sea during summer. Mar Sci Bull 2:38-46 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hytb-e201002005
|
Liu HX, Huang LM, Tan YH, Song XY, Huang JR (2011a) Seasonal variations in species composition and abundance of tintinnids in Shantou coastal water China. Mar Sci Bull 1:80-86 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hytb-e201101008
|
Liu WW, Yi ZZ, Lin XF, Al-Rasheid KAS (2011b) Morphologic and molecular data suggest that Lynnella semiglobulosa n. g., n. sp. represents a new family within the subclass Choreotrichia (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea). J Eukaryot Microbiol 58:43-49 doi: 10.1111/j.1550-7408.2010.00519.x
|
Liu WW, Yi ZZ, Warren A, Al-Rasheid KAS, Al-Farraj SA, Lin XF, Song WB (2011c) Taxonomy, morphology and molecular systematics of a new oligotrich ciliates, Williophrya maedai gen. nov., sp. nov., with redescriptions of Strombidium basimorphum and Pseudotontonia simplicidens (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligotrichia). Syst Biodiver 9:247-258 doi: 10.1080/14772000.2011.605812
|
Liu WW, Yi ZZ, Lin XF, Warren A, Song WB (2012) Phylogeny of three choreotrich genera (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Spirotrichea) with morphological morphogenetic and molecular investigations on three strobilidiid species. Zool Scr 41:417-434 doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.2012.00542.x
|
Liu HX, Li G, Tan YH, Ke ZX, Huang JR, Huang LM (2013a) Latitudinal changes (6° S-20° N) of summer ciliate abundance and species compositions in surface waters from the Java Sea to the South China Sea. Acta Oceanol Sin 32:66-70 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hyxb-e201304008
|
Liu WW, Yi ZZ, Li JQ, Warren A, Al-Farraj S, Lin XF (2013b) Taxonomy, morphology and phylogeny of three new oligotrich ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligotrichia) from southern China. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:4805-4817 doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.052878-0
|
Liu HX, Huang HH, Xu SN, Dai M, Shen PP (2015a) Planktonic community structure during a harmful bloom of Phaeocystis globosa in a subtropical bay with special reference to the ciliate assemblages. Ecotoxicology 24:1419-1429 doi: 10.1007/s10646-015-1464-2
|
Liu WW, Yi ZZ, Xu DP, Clamp J, Li JQ, Lin XF, Song WB (2015b) Two new genera of planktonic ciliates and insights into the evolution of the family Strombidiidae (Protista, Ciliophora, Oligotrichia). PLoS ONE 10:e0131726 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131726
|
Liu WW, Yi ZZ, Lin XF, Li JQ, Al-Farraj SA, Al-Rasheid KAS, Song WB (2015c) Morphology and molecular phylogeny of three new oligotrich ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora) from the South China Sea. Zool J Linn Soc 174:653-665 doi: 10.1111/zoj.12257
|
Liu HX, Chen MR, Shen PP, Huang HH, Dai M, Qi ZH (2016a) A first description of ciliate assemblages in a subtropical eutrophic bay South China Sea: species assemblage and environmental correlates. Aquat Living Resour 29:304 doi: 10.1051/alr/2016027
|
Liu HX, Shen PP, Li CH, Chen ZZ, Qi ZH, Huang HH (2016b) Composition and distribution of planktonic ciliates in the southern South China Sea during late summer: comparison between surface and 75 m deep layer. J Ocean Univ China 15:171-176 doi: 10.1007/s11802-016-2712-7
|
Liu WW, Xu DP, Ma HG, Al-Farraj SA, Warren A, Yi ZZ (2016c) Taxonomy and molecular systematics of three oligotrich (s.l.) ciliates including descriptions of two new species, Strombidium guangdongense sp. nov. and Strombidinopsis sinicum sp. nov. (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Syst Biodiver 14:452-465 doi: 10.1080/14772000.2016.1162872
|
Liu WW, Jiang JM, Xu Y, Pan XM, Qu ZS, Luo XT, El-Serehy AH, Warren A, Ma HG, Pan HB (2017) Diversity of free-living marine ciliates (Alveolata, Ciliophora): Faunal studies in coastal waters of China during the years 2011-2016. Eur J Protist 61:424-438 doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2017.04.007
|
Liu WW, Zhang KX, Chen CZ, Li JQ, Tan YH, Warren A, Lin XF, Song WB (2019) Overview of the biodiversity and geographic distribution of aloricate oligotrich ciliates (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Spirotrichea) in coastal waters of southern China. Syst Biodiver 17:787-800 doi: 10.1080/14772000.2019.1691081
|
Lu KH, Liu WW, Warren A, Xu YS, Zhu CY, Zhao Y, Yi ZZ (2020) Diversity of oligotrich ciliates (Ciliophora, Spirotrichea) in five near-shore sites along northern coast of South China Sea revealed by LSU rDNA sequences. Chin J Oceanol Limn 38:156-167 doi: 10.1007/s00343-019-9021-0
|
Lynn DH (2008) The ciliated protozoa: characterization, classification, and guide to the literature, 3rd edn. Springer, Dordrecht
|
Ma HG, Xu DP, Lin XF, Liu WW (2019) Taxonomy studies on ten marine oligotrich ciliates (Protozoa Ciliophora). Acta Hydrobiol Sin 4:900-909 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ssswxb201904026
|
McManus G, Santoferrara L (2013) Tintinnids in microzooplankton communities. In: Dolan JR, Montagnes DJS, Agatha S, Coats DW, Stoecker DK (eds) The biology and ecology of tintinnid ciliates: models for marine plankton, edn. Wiley, Oxford, Chichester, pp 198-213
|
Middlebrook K, Emerson CW, Roff JC, Lynn DH (1987) Distribution and abundance of tintinnids in the Quoddy Region of the Bay of Fundy. Can J Zool 65:594-601 doi: 10.1139/z87-092
|
Mieczan T (2008) Diversity and vertical distribution of planktonic ciliates in a stratified mesotrophic lake: relationship to environmental conditions. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 37:83-95 http://plankt.oxfordjournals.org/external-ref?access_num=10.2478/v10009-007-0041-2&link_type=DOI
|
Mironova E, Telesh I, Skarlato S (2009) Planktonic ciliates of the Baltic Sea (a review). Inland Water Biol 2:13-24 doi: 10.1134/S1995082909010039
|
Mironova E, Telesh I, Skarlato S (2012) Diversity and seasonality in structure of ciliate communities in the Neva Estuary (Baltic Sea). J Plankton Res 34:208-220 doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbr095
|
Montagnes DJS, Poulton AJ, Shammon TM (1999) Mesoscale, finescale and microscale distribution of micro- and nanoplankton in the Irish Sea, with emphasis on ciliates and their prey. Mar Biol 134:167-179 doi: 10.1007/s002270050535
|
Montagnes DJS, Allen R, Brown R, Bulit R, Davidson R, Fielding R, Heath M, Holliday P, Rasmussen J, Sanders R, Waniek J, Wilson D (2010) Role of ciliates and other microzooplankton in the Irminger Sea (NW Atlantic Ocean). Mar Ecol Prog Ser 411:101-115 doi: 10.3354/meps08646
|
Nie DS, Cheng PS (1947) Tintinnoinea of the Hainan region. Contrib Biol Lab Sci Soc China Zool Ser 16:41-86 http://www.researchgate.net/publication/291993535_Tintinnoinea_of_the_Hainan_region
|
Pierce R, Turner J (1992) Ecology of planktonic ciliates in marine food webs. Rev Aquat Sci 6:139-181 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ddfe1ea22303a85d835a0cdb4362266a
|
Pitta P, Giannakourou A (2000) Planktonic ciliates in the oligotrophic Eastern Mediterranean: vertical, spatial distribution and mixotrophy. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 194:269-282 doi: 10.3354/meps194269
|
Rakshit D, Ganesh PS, Sarkar SK (2016) Choreotrich ciliate tintinnid (protozoa: ciliophora) in a tropical meso-macrotidal estuary, eastern part of india. Reg Stud Mar Sci 3:89-100 doi: 10.1016/j.rsma.2015.06.003
|
Rychert K, Nawacka B, Majchrowski R, Zapadka T (2014) Latitudinal pattern of abundance and composition of ciliate communities in the surface waters of the Atlantic Ocean. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 43:436-441 doi: 10.2478/s13545-014-0161-8
|
Santoferrara LF, Alder V (2009) Abundance trends and ecology of planktonic ciliates of the South-Western Atlantic (35-63° S): a comparison between neritic and oceanic environments. J Plankton Res 31:837-851 doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbp033
|
Santoferrara LF, Alder V (2012) Abundance and diversity of tintinnids (planktonic ciliates) under contrasting levels of productivity in the argentine shelf and drake passage. J Sea Res 71:25-30 doi: 10.1016/j.seares.2012.04.002
|
Santoferrara LF, McManus GB (2017) Integrating dimensions of biodiversity in choreotrichs and oligotrichs of marine plankton. Eur J Protistol 61:323-330 doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2017.04.004
|
Santoferrara LF, Grattepanche J-D, Katz LA, McManus GB (2014) Pyrosequencing for assessing diversity of eukaryotic microbes: analysis of data on marine planktonic ciliates and comparison with traditional methods. Environ Microbiol 16:2752-2763 doi: 10.1111/1462-2920.12380
|
Santoferrara LF, Ewelina R, Mcmanus GB (2018) Global and local dna (meta) barcoding reveal new biogeography patterns in tintinnid ciliates. J Plankton Res 40:209-221 doi: 10.1093/plankt/fby011
|
Shaw P, Chao S (1994) Surface circulation in the South China Sea. Deep-Sea Res Pt I 41:1663-1683 doi: 10.1016/0967-0637(94)90067-1
|
Shen Z, Liu WW, Zhang S, Yi ZZ, Liu HB (2018) Taxonomy morphology and phylogeny of a new oligotrich ciliate- Omegastrombidium hongkongense n. sp. (Protozoa: Ciliophora) from clear water bay Hong Kong. J Ocean Univ China 17:890-896 doi: 10.1007/s11802-018-3483-0
|
Sinistro N (2010) Top-down and bottom-up regulation of planktonic communities in a warm temperate wetland. J Plankton Res 32:209-220 doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbp114
|
Sohrin R, Imazawa M, Fukuda H, Suzuki Y (2010) Full-depth profiles of prokaryotes, heterotrophic nanoflagellates, and ciliates along a transect from the equatorial to the subarctic central pacific ocean. Deep-Sea Res Pt II 57:1537-1550 doi: 10.1016/j.dsr2.2010.02.020
|
Song WB, Warren A, Hu XZ (2009) Free-living ciliates in the Bohai and Yellow Seas China. Science Press, Beijing
|
Song XY, Lai ZG, Ji RB, Chen CS, Zhang JL, Huang LM, Yin JQ, Wang YS, Lian SM, Zhu XM (2012) Summertime primary production in northwest South China Sea: interaction of coastal eddy upwelling and biological processes. Cont Shelf Res 48:110-121 doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2012.07.016
|
Song W, Li JM, Liu WW, Jiang JM, Al-Rasheid KAS, Hu XZ (2013) Taxonomy morphology and molecular systematics of three oligotrich ciliates including a description of Apostrombidium parakielum spec. nov. (Ciliophora, Oligotrichia). Inter J Syst Evol Microbiol 63:1179-1191 doi: 10.1099/ijs.0.048314-0
|
Song W, Li JQ, Liu WW, Al-Rasheid KAS, Hu XZ, Lin XF (2015a) Taxonomy and molecular phylogeny of four Strombidium species including description of S. pseudostylifer sp. nov. (Ciliophora, Oligotrichia). Syst Biodiver 13:76-92 doi: 10.1080/14772000.2014.970674
|
Song W, Zhao XL, Liu WW, Hu XZ, Al-Rasheid KAS, Song WB (2015b) Biodiversity of oligotrich ciliates in the South China Sea: description of three new Strombidium species (Protozoa, Ciliophora, Oligotrichia) with phylogenetic analyses. Syst Biodiver 13:608-623 doi: 10.1080/14772000.2015.1081992
|
Song W, Wang L, Li LF, Al-Farraj AS, Aleidan A, Smith S, Hu XZ (2018a) Morphological characterizations of four species of Parallelostrombidium (Ciliophora, Oligotrichia) with a note on the phylogeny of the genus. J Eukaryot Microbiol 65:679-693 doi: 10.1111/jeu.12513
|
Song W, Li JM, Huang YY, Hu XZ, Liu WW, Al-Rasheid K, Miao M (2018b) Morphology of three aloricate choreotrich ciliates, including description of a new species Parastrombidinopsis costalis sp. n. (Ciliophora, Choreotrichia), and phylogeny of the genus Parastrombidinopsis. Acta Protozool 57:153-167 doi: 10.4467/16890027AP.18.013.10089
|
Song W, Xu DP, Zhang QQ, Liu WW, Warren A, Song WB (2019) Taxonomy and phylogeny of two poorly studied genera of marine oligotrich ciliates including descriptions of two news pecies: Cyrtostrombidium paraboreale sp. n. and Apostrombidium orientale sp. n. (Ciliophora: Spirotrichea). Eur J Protist 70:1-16 doi: 10.1016/j.ejop.2019.05.001
|
Stock A, Edgcomb V, Orsi W, Filker S, Stoeck T (2013) Evidence for isolated evolution of deep-sea ciliate communities through geological separation and environmental selection. BMC Microbiol 13:150 doi: 10.1186/1471-2180-13-150
|
Su JL (2004) Overview of the South China Sea circulation and its influence on the coastal physical oceanography near the Pearl River. Cont Shelf Res 24:1745-1760 doi: 10.1016/j.csr.2004.06.005
|
Su Q, Huang LM, Tan YH, Xu RL, Li T, Xu ZZ, Zhang JL, Qiu DJ (2007) Preliminary study of microzooplankton grazing and community composition in the north of South China Sea in autumn. Mar Sci Bull 2:43-53 http://en.cnki.com.cn/Article_en/CJFDTOTAL-HYTY200702006.htm
|
Su Q, Huang LM, Tan YH, Wang HK, Dong JD, Chen QH, Song XY, Hu YM (2008) Microzooplankton community composition and grazing pressure in coral reefs of Sanya Bay. Mar Sci Bull 2:28-36 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hytb200802005
|
Sun P, Huang LY, Xu DP, Huang BQ, Chen NW, Warren A (2017) Marked seasonality and high spatial variation in estuarine ciliates are driven by exchanges between the 'abundant' and 'intermediate' biospheres. Sci Rep 7:9494 doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-10308-y
|
Sun P, Huang LY, Xu DP, Warren A, Huang BQ, Wang Y, Wang L, Xiao WP, Kong J (2019) Integrated space-time dataset reveals high diversity and distinct community structure of ciliates in mesopelagic waters of the northern South China Sea. Front Microbiol 10:2178 doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02178
|
Tan YH, Huang LM, Huang XP, Su Q, Shi X, Huang JR (2010) The relationships between ciliate composition abundance and environmental factors in Sanya Bay coral reef waters. Acta Ecol Sin 30:6835-6844 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=stxb201024019
|
Thompson G, Alder V (2005) Patterns in tintinnid species composition and abundance in relation to hydrological conditions of the Southwestern Atlantic during austral spring. Aquat Microb Ecol 40:85-101 doi: 10.3354/ame040085
|
Thompson G, Alder V, Boltovskoy D (2001) Tintinnids (Ciliophora) and other microzooplankton in Southwestern Atlantic Shelf break waters. Mar Ecol 22:343-355 doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0485.2001.01723.x
|
Urrutxurtu I (2004) Seasonal succession of tintinnids in the nervión river estuary, basque country, spain. J Plankton Res 26:307-314 doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbh034
|
Wang YB, Zhang WJ, Lin YS, Zheng LM, Cao WQ, Yang J (2013) Spatial pattern of the planktonic ciliate community and its relationship with the environment in spring in the northern Beibu Gulf South China Sea. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 42:470-479 doi: 10.2478/s13545-013-0103-x
|
Wang YB, Zhang WJ, Lin YS, Cao WQ, Zheng LM, Yang J (2014) Phosphorus nitrogen and chlorophyll-a are significant factors controlling ciliate communities in summer in the northern Beibu Gulf South China Sea. PLoS ONE 9:e101121 doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101121
|
Wang YJ, Xu CL, Hu SM, Li T, Liu S (2017) Diel variation of community structure of planktonic ciliates in coastal ecosystem of Sanya Bay. J Trop Ocean 1:72-80 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rdhy201701010
|
Wang CF, Li HB, Zhao L, Zhao Y, Dong Y, Zhang WC, Xiao T (2018a) Vertical distribution of planktonic ciliates in the oceanic and slope areas of the western Pacific Ocean. Deep-Sea Res PT II 167:70-78 http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=8f4533680097a79ca54a0ab8e3427bfe
|
Wang R, Song W, Yi ZZ, Al-Rasheid ASK, Hu XZ (2018b) Morphology and molecular phylogeny of two new species of Spirostrombidium (Ciliophora, Oligotrichia) with a key to the species of Spirostrombidium. Syst Biodiver 16:743-756 doi: 10.1080/14772000.2018.1484393
|
Weisse T, Karstens N, Meyer VCL, Janke L, Teichgrber K (2001) Niche separation in common prostome freshwater ciliates: the effect of food and temperature. Aquat Microb Ecol 26:167-179 doi: 10.3354/ame026167
|
Wickham SA, Claessens M, Post AF (2015) Ciliates, microbes and nutrients: interactions in the seasonally mixed gulf of aqaba. J Plankton Res 37:258-271 doi: 10.1093/plankt/fbu103
|
Wu FX, Huang HH, Huang JR, Liu HX (2016a) Spatial pattern of the planktonic ciliate community in spring in Baisha Bay South China Sea and its relationship with its environment. J Trop Ocean 3:79-86 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rdhy201603010
|
Wu FX, Huang JR, Dai M, Liu HX, Huang HH (2016b) Using ciliates to monitor different aquatic environments in Daya Bay South China Sea. Can J Zool 94:265-273 doi: 10.1139/cjz-2015-0202
|
Wu FX, Huang HH, Tan YH, Qi ZH (2016c) Planktonic ciliate community and its relationship with environmental factors in South China Sea during autumn. Acta Sci Nat Univ Sunyatseni 5:89-95 (in Chinese with English abstract)
|
Wu FX, Huang HH, Dai M, Tan YH, Qi ZH, Zhang WB (2017a) Spatial and temporal pattern of planktonic ciliate community and its relationship with its environment in Dapeng Cove the South China Sea. South China Fish Sci 1:1-9 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nfsc201701001
|
Wu FX, Huang JR, Qi ZH, Huang HH (2017b) Spatial and seasonal variations in the planktonic ciliate community and its relationship with environmental factors in Daya Bay the South China Sea. Oceanol Hydrobiol Stud 44:212-222
|
Wu FX, Dai M, Huang HH, Qi ZH (2019) Plankton ciliate community responses to different aquatic environments in Nan'ao Island a representative mariculture base in the South China Sea. Mar Freshw Res 70:426-436 doi: 10.1071/MF18153
|
Xie ZC, Lin L, Xiao YY, Liu Y, Li CH (2018) Species composition and grazing of microzooplankton in central South China Sea in autumn of 2016. South China Fish Sci 3:40-48 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=nfsc201803005
|
Xu RL, Bai QS (1998a) Community structures of planktonic ciliates in the water near to Dayawan Bay nuclear power plant. Acta Sci Nat Univ Sunyatseni 2:89-95 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://europepmc.org/abstract/CBA/314409
|
Xu RL, Bai QS (1998b) Strombidinopsis grandis: a new species of Strombidinopsis. J Trop Ocean 17:40-43 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://europepmc.org/abstract/CBA/320412
|
Xu RL, Bai QS, Wu ZH, Meng JS (1994) Studies on the protozoan ecology in the waters around Nansha Islands I biodiversities. In: Studies on marine biodiversity of the Nansha Islands and neighboring waters I. Ocean Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
|
Xu RL, Bai QS, Wu ZH, Meng JS (1996) Studies on the protozoan ecology in the waters around Nansha Islands II A thorough analysis of biodiversities. In: Studies on marine biodiversity of the Nansha Islands and neighboring waters II. Ocean Press, Beijing (in Chinese)
|
Xu HL, Song WB, Warren A, Al-Rasheid KAS, Al-Farraj SA, Gong J, Hu XZ (2008) Planktonic protist communities in a semi-enclosed mariculture pond: structural variation and correlation with environmental conditions. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 88:1353-1362 doi: 10.1017/S0025315408002129
|
Yu LY, Zhang WJ, Lin YR, Wang YB, Zhu KX, Li AR, Cao WQ (2014a) Ecological research on tintinnids in Tieshan Harbour Guangxi. Saf Environ Engin 3:12-27 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=dzktaq201403003
|
Yu Y, Zhang WC, Cai YM, Feng MP, Li HB, Xiao T (2014b) Distribution patterns of planktonic ciliates in the northern South China Sea in winter and summer 2009. Oceanol Limnol Sin 45:839-847 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=hyyhz201404022
|
Yu Y, Zhang WC, Cai YM, Feng MP, Li HB, Xiao T (2014c) Abundance and biomass of planktonic ciliates in the Beibu Gulf during summer 2009. J Trop Ocean 2:60-65 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=rdhy201402008
|
Zhang CX, Zhang WC, Xiao T (2010) Ciliates abundance and biomass in northern South China Sea in October 2007. Acta Ecol Sin 4:867-877 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.oalib.com/paper/1402547
|
Zhang W, Jiang Y, Li JQ, Ma HG, Xu HZ (2012) Tintinnid ciliates from coastal waters off Guangdong with notes on three new records of China (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Acta Hydrobiol Sin 4:745-750 (in Chinese with English abstract) http://www.wanfangdata.com.cn/details/detail.do?_type=perio&id=ssswxb201204019
|
Zhang CX, Sun J, Wang D, Song S, Zhang X, Munir S (2017) Tintinnid community structure in the eastern equatorial Indian Ocean during the spring inter-monsoon period. Aquat Biol 26:87-100 doi: 10.3354/ab00677
|
No. | Longitude and latitude | Year of sampling | Month of sampling | Number of species | Number of new reports | Location | Habitat | References |
1 | 110.03° E, 20.003° N | 2017 | Oct | 1 | 0 | Haikou | Reef | Bai et al.(2019) |
2 | – | 2006–2016 | – | 10 | 0 | Zhanjiang/Guangzhou/Shenzhen/Huizhou/Hong Kong | Wetland/Estuary/Mariculture/Beach/Reef/Dock/Harbour | Liu et al.(2019) |
3 | 110.40° E, 21.20° N/110.41° E, 21.37° N | 2012/2013 | Nov/Oct | 2 | 2 | Zhanjiang | Harbour/Mangrove | Song et al.(2019) |
4 | – | 2003–2010 | – | 10 | 0 | Zhanjiang/Daya Bay | Beach/Mariculture | Ma et al.(2019) |
5 | 114.27° E, 22.27° N | 2014 | Dec | 1 | 1 | Hong Kong | Dock | Shen et al.(2018) |
6 | 109.5° E, 18.23° N/110.6° E, 20.01° N/110.55° E, 21.23° N/113.98° E, 22.5° N | 2013/2014/2018 | Apr/Jun/Nov | 3 | 1 | Zhuhai/Sanya/Zhanjiang/Haikou | Estuary/Harbour/Wetland | Song et al.(2018b) |
7 | 113.98° E, 22.5° N/110.55° E, 20.1° N/110.60° E, 21.23° N | 2014/2014/2013 | May/Apr/Oct | 3 | 2 | Zhuhai/Haikou/Zhanjiang | Estuary/Wetland/– | Song et al.(2018a) |
8 | 110.4° E, 21.37° N | 2013 | Oct | 1 | 1 | Zhanjiang | Mangrove | Wang et al.(2018b) |
9 | 110.4° E, 21.2° N | 2009/2010/2010 | Dec/Mar/Mar | 3 | 2 | Zhanjiang | Harbour | Liu et al.(2016c) |
10 | 114.9° E, 22.7° N/110.7° E, 21.6° N | 2009/2010 | May/Mar | 2 | 2 | Daya Bay/Zhanjiang | Littoral zone/Mangrove | Liu et al.(2015b) |
11 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N/113.67° E, 22.67° N/114.53° E, 22.71° N | 2008/2009/2009 | Apr/Apr/May | 3 | 3 | Shenzhen/Guangzhou/Daya Bay | Mangrove/Mariculture/– | Liu et al.(2015c) |
12 | 110.43° E, 21.15° N/110.31° E, 21.1° N | 2010/2013 | Mar/Nov | 2 | 1 | Zhanjiang | Mangrove | Song et al.(2015a) |
13 | 113.61° E, 22.75° N/110.41° E, 21.38° N/110.4° E, 21.2° N | 2013/2013/2013 | May/Oct/Nov | 3 | 3 | Guangzhou/Zhanjiang/Zhanjiang | Estuary/Mangrove/- | Song et al.(2015b) |
14 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N/109.43° E, 21.37° N/109.75° E, 21.51° N | 2007/2010/2010 | Nov/Mar/Mar | 3 | 3 | Daya Bay/Zhanjiang/Zhanjiang | Dock/Mangrove/Mangrove | Liu et al.(2013b) |
15 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N/114.07° E, 22.61° N | 2007/2008 | Aug/Apr | 2 | 0 | Daya Bay/Shenzhen | –/Mangrove | Song et al.(2013) |
16 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N | 2008 | Dec | 1 | 0 | Shenzhen | – | Jiang et al.(2012) |
17 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N/113.91° E, 22.49° N/114.53° E, 22.71° N | 2007/2008/2007 | Apr/Dec/Nov | 3 | 2 | Daya Bay/Shenzhen/Daya Bay | –/Harbour/– | Liu et al.(2012) |
18 | – | 2008 | Nov–Dec | 16 | 0 | Daya Bay | – | Zhang et al.(2012) |
19 | 114.53° E, 22.71° N | 2007 | Dec | 1 | 1 | Daya Bay | Harbour | Liu et al.(2011b) |
20 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N/114.54° E, 22.71° N | 2008/2008 | Apr/Mar | 3 | 1 | Shenzhen/Daya Bay | Mangrove/- | Liu et al.(2011c) |
21 | 114.07° E, 22.61° N | 2008 | Jan/Mar | 2 | 2 | Shenzhen | Mangrove | Liu et al.(2009) |
22 | – | – | – | 1 | 1 | Daya Bay | – | Xu et al.(1998b) |
23 | – | 1933/1934 | – | 51 | 10 | Hainan Island | – | Nie and Cheng (1947) |
— data not available |
No. | Longitude (°E) | Latidute (°N) | Year of sampling | Month of sampling | Number of sites | Number of species | Groups | Area | Habitat | References |
1 | 108.25–109.88 | 20.1–21.47 | 2011 | Apr | 19 | 36 | All ciliates | Beibu Gulf | Oceanic | Wang et al. (2013) |
2 | 108.25–109.88 | 20.1–21.47 | 2011 | Aug | 21 | 101 | All ciliates | Beibu Gulf | Oceanic | Wang et al. (2014) |
3 | 109.4–110.0 | 21.2–21.6 | 2010 | Apr/Aug | 8 | 8/13 | Tintinnids | Tieshan Harbour | Neritic | Yu et al. (2014a) |
4 | 110–120 | 18–23.25 | 2007 | Aug | 36 | 44 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2010b) |
5 | 113.5–118 | 18–23.5 | 2007 | Aug | 13 | 38 | All ciliates | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2010a) |
6 | 116.6–117.2 | 23–23.6 | 2007 | Apr/Nov | 5 | 14 | Tintinnids | Shantou coast | Neritic | Liu et al. (2011a) |
7 | 111–115.4 | 6.9–11 | 2011 | Aug | 11 | 30 | All ciliates | Southern SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2016b) |
8 | 108.45–108.62 | 21.72–21.88 | 2012 | Jan/Apr | 16 | 18/21 | All ciliates | Maowei Sea | Neritic | Liu et al. (2016a) |
9 | 108.45–108.62 | 21.72–21.88 | 2011 | Dec | 16 | 19 | All ciliates | Maowei Sea | Neritic | Liu et al. (2015a) |
10 | 109.5–113.5 | 5–19.5 | 2010 | May | 14 | 22 | All ciliates | SCS | Oceanic | Liu et al. (2013a) |
11 | 114.25–116.77 | 18.9–20.97 | 2015 | Nov | 16 | 53 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Wang et al.(2018a, b) |
12 | 113.4–114.2 | 21.6–23.2 | 2014/2015/2017 | Oct/Oct/Jun/Jun/Mar/Apr | 19/41/36/26/29/35 | 30/26/16/16/19/22 | Tintinnids | Pearl River Estuary | Neritic | Li et al. (2019) |
13 | 111–117 | 18.5–22 | 2009 | Jan/Apr | 18 | −/22 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Yu et al. (2014b) |
14 | 109.48–113.23 | 17.43–21.43 | 2007 | Dec | 82 | 49 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Zhang et al. (2010) |
15 | 107.25–109.75 | 18.75–21.35 | 2009 | Aug | 12 | 20 | Tintinnids | Beibu Gulf | Oceanic | Yu et al. (2014c) |
16 | 109.48–113.23 | 17.43–21.43 | 2007 | Oct | 82 | 22 | Tintinnids | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Feng et al. (2010) |
17 | 117.06–117.1 | 23.45–23.48 | 2014 | Apr/Aug | 13 | 19/28 | All ciliates | Shen'ou Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2019) |
18 | 114.5–114.8 | 22.5–22.7 | 2014 | Jan/Apr/Aug/Nov | 12 | 41 | All ciliates | Daya Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2016b) |
19 | 114.5–114.83 | 22.5–22.83 | 2014 | Jan/Apr/Aug/Nov | 6 | 11/21/14/13 | All ciliates | Dapeng Cove | Neritic | Wu et al. (2017a) |
20 | 114.5–114.83 | 22.5–22.83 | 1997 | Apr | 20 | 9–29 | All ciliates | Dapeng Cove | Neritic | Xu et al.(1998a, b) |
21 | 117.06–117.1 | 23.45–23.5 | 2014 | Apr | 13 | 19 | All ciliates | Baisha Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2016a) |
22 | 109.3–116.5 | 5.4–11.6 | 2013 | Nov | 18 | 17 | All ciliates | Southern SCS | Oceanic | Wu et al. (2016c) |
23 | 112–118.5 | 8.5–15 | 2016 | Oct | 10 | 20 | All ciliates | Central SCS | Oceanic | Xie et al. (2018) |
24 | 109.33–109.5 | 18.18–18.3 | 2004 | Aug | 12 | 58 | All ciliates | Sanya Bay | Neritic | Tan et al. (2010) |
25 | 110.5–120 | 14–22.25 | 2004 | Sep | 5 | 17 | All ciliates | Northern SCS | Oceanic | Su et al. (2007) |
26 | 116.75–117.9 | 21.7–22.75 | 2013/2014 | Apr/Jun/Apr/Jul | 5 | 79 | All ciliates | Northeastern SCS | Oceanic | Sun et al. (2019) |
27 | 109.33–109.5 | 18.2–18.25 | 2006 | Apr | 6 | 102 | All ciliates | Sanya Bay | Neritic | Su et al. (2008) |
28 | 108–118 | 4.0–12.0 | 1993/1994 | May/Apr | 44 | – | All ciliates | Nansha Islands | Oceanic | Xu et al. (1994) |
29 | 108–118 | 4.0–12.0 | 1994 | Sep | 40 | 75 | All ciliates | Nansha Islands | Oceanic | Xu et al. (1996) |
30 | 114.5–114.8 | 22.5–22.7 | 2014 | Jan/Apr/Aug/Nov | 12 | 41 | All ciliates | Daya Bay | Neritic | Wu et al. (2017b) |
31 | 109.45 | 18.02 | 2014 | Apr | 1 | 79OTU | All ciliates | Sanya Bay | Neritic | Wang et al. (2017) |
32 | – | – | 2006–2018 | – | – | 71 | All ciliates | Coastal area of Guangdong | Intertidal | Hu et al. (2019) |
33 | – | – | 2015 | – | 5 | 60OTU | All ciliates | Coastal area of Guangdong | Intertidal | Lu et al. (2020) |
— data not available |